Zelensky isn't the one raping toddlers to death. That's the Russians. And you're supporting it. And no matter how much you repeat the Iraq references, it doesn't erase what Russians have done (and what you're supporting). |
That story sure seems to grow worse each time you retell it, can't wait to see how you work an incubator into it. Or maybe the toddler was in the middle of eating a yellow cake. You may want to dismiss Iraq (and Syria/Afghanistan/Libya/Kosovo/etc.) but plenty of other countries weigh this hypocrisy when deciding which side to back. We have a BRICS summit coming up. Wonder how many countries will express interest in joining? |
I'm not dismissing Iraq, I'm simply saying it does not give the free pass for Russia to commit war crimes that you claim it does. |
Russia is the aggressor. However, Russia’s economy is not decimated. It has plenty of life left to continue the destruction and ruining innocent lives. I think being alive is more important than being right. Maybe it’s just me. |
This is true, many aren’t. What’s so funny? |
What’s your point? I have friends and family there. There is plenty of meat and even seafood. Seafood isn’t great for the most part but it never was. Pensioners don’t eat ferrero roche. Prices are rising and people are getting poorer in general. However everything is available. I don’t see why the economy will collapse in 2 years. So far it’s been faring better than predicted. Trust me id love the war to stop in 2 years. However I think the grind will go on. You underestimate the ability of Russian pensioners to live on bread and potatoes. Russia has done a surprisingly good job of channeling the energy of those who might be unhappy AND capable of bringing change. Yes it includes window falls and poisoning but not only. I don’t support the russia cause but I am amazed at how surprisingly well they are faring so far. |
DP but it’s amazing how true it still sounds if you switch Russia/USSR and the US in your tirade Politics is politics. Every large player wants to extend influence. Some are just considered the good guys because they are setting the rules |
Serious question: how many Ukrainian lives can they afford to lose for this to still stand true? |
DP. I think there will be continued support for years, however modest, maybe not so modest even. Look at Israel. However it doesn’t change the fact that the lives keep being lost. How many years of fighting is it going to be worth it? |
I don't know, but right now, Russia is abducting both Ukrainian children and senior citizens, and treating them like dog sh!t. They probably don't want that for their future, if they were to surrender and spare lives. |
You’re not? Level up please: how much time did you spend on DCUM at the time weeping over Iraqi casualties, infrastructure damage and losses? Truth is, you cannot wait to shrug it off. You certainly don’t want to go to court over it, or to pay damages ever. |
It doesn't f'ing matter how much time I gnashed my teeth over Iraq or not. (I wasn't even aware of DCUM at the time anyway). It doesn't give Russia a free pass to commit the war crimes like you think it does. I doubt you spent much time weeping over Iraq yourself. |
Russia has proven resourceful, but I believe the candle is burning. I also think there are two recent developments that have the potential to tip the scales even further. "Ukraine responds reciprocally to Russian blackmail, will consider “vessels heading to Russian ports as potential carriers of military cargo”" https://euromaidanpress.com/2023/07/20/ukraine-responds-reciprocally-to-russian-blackmail-will-consider-vessels-heading-to-russian-ports-as-potential-carriers-of-military-cargo/ "Russia Lays Mines in Black Sea to Block Ukrainian Ports" https://news.usni.org/2023/07/19/russia-says-all-ships-in-the-black-sea-heading-to-ukraine-are-potential-carriers-of-military-cargo This is a significant development. It would not be difficult for Ukraine to cut off Russian shipping through the Black Sea. The Russians have already laid mines and Russia would be economically vulnerable if shipping to Russia was cut off. Although I couldn't find the specific breakdown of ship types and number of ships making calls to Russian ports, it's clear there are ample targets. "In 2021, 38,551 ships transited Bosphorus of the Turkish Straights (down from 43,999 in 2018)." https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251644/number-of-transits-through-the-turkish-straits/ "COMMERCIAL VESSELS MADE 10,550 CALLS TO BLACK SEA PORTS IN RUSSIA, TURKEY, BULGARIA, ROMANIA, UKRAINE, GEORGIA AND MOLDOVA IN THE SECOND QUARTER ACCORDING TO VESSEL TRACKING DATA FROM LLOYD’S LIST INTELLIGENCE." https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1141687/Black-Sea-arrivals-rising-amid-changing-trade-dynamics Q2 2022 1. Russia 5043 2. Romania 2359 3. Turkey 1167 4. Bulgaria 880 5. Ukraine 610 6. Georgia 354 7. Moldova 137 The registries of these ships pre-war were normally from Greece, Netherlands, Marshall Islands, Switzerland, Japan, Germany, Italy, Hong Kong, Singapore. Post Q2 2022, the registries significantly increased of Bahamas, Unknown Owner, Cyprus, Lebanon, Netherlands, Azerbaijan, Marshall Islands, Turkey, Russia, Romania, Egypt, Switzerland. https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/-/media/lloyds-list/images/ukraine-russia-conflict/black_sea.jpg I believe that if Ukraine does stop Russian shipping through the Black Sea, Russia could economically collapse? Russia just can't move cargo from the Pacific to the Atlantic, or overland that easily. Cutting off Russian shipping in Europe could drastically affect the Russian Economy. |
| And I'm not saying to starve the pensioners. I'm saying that Russia's war machine would, for the most part, grind to a screeching halt. |
Why is this a question for Ukraine? Why is the same not a question for Russia? Russia has already lost more troops and equipment in the last 2 years than it has in every single other war combined since the 1970s, to include Afghan, Chechen, Dagestan, Georgia, Syria, African conflicts and everywhere else. The Russians were able to last 20 years with the Afghan war before deciding it was unsustainable but a.) that was with the much greater might and resources, engineering, logistic and manufacturing capacity of the Soviet Union and b. that was with just a fraction of the losses that Russia is now suffering in Ukraine. As such, Russia cannot keep this going indefinitely. They cannot last 20 years. They would be lucky to last 5 years, and we're already 2 years into that. Ukraine is fighting for its very survival. They are fighting for their identity, their language, their way of life, their will to become a part of the European community, and so much more. But what is Russia fighting for? They are fighting because Putin wills it. Because Russia wants their resources. Because of lies about "Nazis" and other stupidity. Russia's rationale for war is far weaker than Ukraine's rationale for resisting them. |