Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Why a tin hat in response to valid information and a reasonable request for an independent investigation? It appears you throw slurs when you can't come up with a valid argument. The old logical fallacy of ad hominem. |
|
It boils down to posters asking me to sacrifice democracy here in the United State and all that we’ve fought for including women’s rights, the right to marry who we choose, and the strength of trusted institutions, for what exactly?
Trump will pour more money into Israel. The republicans have been clear and stead fast in their support of Netanyahu. So …they are asking us to give up our democracy for… nothing. Which make me think they don’t actually understand or support democracy. |
How easy is it to make that distinction, actually? Returned hostages have said they were held in apartments with families. One of the ordinary Palestinians holding Jewish hostages in his apartment with his family taught at a UNRWA school. One of the Gaza hospital chiefs was himself a Hamas officer. The sole adult male hostage released said he was returned by ordinary Palestinians to Hamas after he managed to escape captivity. And who were those throngs of ordinary Gazans beating the hostages when they were first abducted after the October 7th massacre? And the Gazan workers who provided intelligence support to Hamas when they planned their attacks on the Israeli border communities? We want to believe there are ordinary Palestinians who don't provide practical support to Hamas and are merely forced to serve as their human shields at massive personal cost. But... where is the evidence that they don't support Hamas? Because they sure seem to. |
Russian troll reveals self. Brilliant |
There have been no conspiracies. There has only been hatred for the callous disregard for human life in the IDF’s vicious, premeditated execution of this war and past conflicts in the region (and the acts of terrorism by Hamas, by various Palestinian leadership groups, by the Israel government, by Israeli settlers, etc.). But what you really want is censorship to help conceal the sins of Israel. You desperately want to make everyone go back to the days when the Israeli propaganda machine set the narrative and dictated to Americans what to think about the regional conflict. Racist Islamophobes like you are in panic mode right now, desperate to stifle discussion that casts a horrifying light on your lack of humanity and desperate to restore your own image as the victim. It must be deeply unsettling. But attempting to intimidate critical voices by suggesting that they will be cancelled by the professionalized “anti-hate” industry is pathetic and a vibrant signal that you are, in fact, losing your shit over the narrative escaping your grasp. |
Every available piece of data indicates strong support for Hamas. The leftists here have no idea who or what they’re supporting. It’s an echo of the US left’s embrace of Mao. |
If you think someone is present at one of those protests who has the influence with Hamas leadership to demand the release of the hostages you should be calling the FBI not posting on DCUM. |
Anyone? How will pro-Hamas Democrats vote next time, considering how many Democrat politicians and WH workers have dual citizenship with Israel? |
Israel has distinguished between civilians and Hamas. Here's the thing, Hamas doesn't make a distinction. Therein lies the problem. Hamas, also, will not agree to a ceasefire to save civilians. See: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/hamas-islamic-jihad-reject-giving-up-power-return-permanent-ceasefire-egyptian-2023-12-25/ This is a huge, huge problem. |
DP. Nice deflection. Fact is, many do support Hamas. Check the polls. |
Got it. So "kill them all, let God sort it out" is the justification? |
Case and point. You are posting on anonymous board because you know that you are spreading hate and misinformation. I dare you to post this on Linkedin under your actual name. |
Here’s hoping the pro Hamas D’s aren’t in office to vote on anything. I’ll be donating to their primary opponents. —Left of center independent |
|
but that is what you said. Since they [this], there is no reason to think they will not do [that], since [that] is evil and [they] are evil. |