Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will she travel with Harry when Prince Phillip dies? Also, he’s had some beautiful mistresses. Was he a looker in his youth?

Who, Harry?

Nope, referring to Prince Grandad.

DP. Yes. Tall and handsome. Also he still has a mistress that he basically lives with.

Lol. Why do you make stuff up.

I'm not the PP, but this is true. Her name is Penelope Knatchbull.

[Anonymous]

They were all extra nice to her. She is so entitled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet Harry will eventually be a sad divorcee, too...Meghan does not know how to sustain family relationships (with the exception of her mother). She also basically took Harry as far away from his family as possible. Not just the US, but the West Coast. She has been keeping Archie from pretty much the entire family - again with the exception of her mother (since well before covid!!). He has cousins of a similar age, a grandfather, great-grandma...It strikes me as very cruel. And before we know it (well, a few years down the line), Meghan will be sick of Harry, and he will be far away from home in a foreign country in order to be able to stay close to his kids.

Just stop. They were never some big happy family. They do not care about Archie. Will and Kate didn’t see him for two weeks after he was born and they lived on the same property. QEII didn’t attend his baptism. What difference does it make if they aren’t seeing him in the UK or California? The BRF is more of a business than your average family. Elizabeth was Harry’s boss not just his granny and she’s going to do what’s best for the institution and not what is best for him where those things conflict. I don’t think that makes her a bad person but you cannot make the argument that what is best for Harry as an individual is to hang around waiting for his brothers kids to make him obsolete. Even if he and a Meghan do get divorced he will still be in a better position financially and professionally than all his divorced aunts and uncles.


Also Meghan didn’t take him anywhere they, with the exception of Charles who was open to the half in/half out, they booted him. BRF does not seem like they never get too attached to married ins likely because of all the divorces (with the exception of Edward’s beard Sophie).

Np. I could see Meghan telling the Royal family when they could see Archie. You know " boundaries" that you all talk about. Or she would want "privacy" to bond as a new family of three.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is she again going to hold her belly with both hands?

I hope so. I enjoyed the whining on this thread about it.

Wait! I thought she was narcissistic for holding it with one hand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet Harry will eventually be a sad divorcee, too...Meghan does not know how to sustain family relationships (with the exception of her mother). She also basically took Harry as far away from his family as possible. Not just the US, but the West Coast. She has been keeping Archie from pretty much the entire family - again with the exception of her mother (since well before covid!!). He has cousins of a similar age, a grandfather, great-grandma...It strikes me as very cruel. And before we know it (well, a few years down the line), Meghan will be sick of Harry, and he will be far away from home in a foreign country in order to be able to stay close to his kids.

Just stop. They were never some big happy family. They do not care about Archie. Will and Kate didn’t see him for two weeks after he was born and they lived on the same property. QEII didn’t attend his baptism. What difference does it make if they aren’t seeing him in the UK or California? The BRF is more of a business than your average family. Elizabeth was Harry’s boss not just his granny and she’s going to do what’s best for the institution and not what is best for him where those things conflict. I don’t think that makes her a bad person but you cannot make the argument that what is best for Harry as an individual is to hang around waiting for his brothers kids to make him obsolete. Even if he and a Meghan do get divorced he will still be in a better position financially and professionally than all his divorced aunts and uncles.


Also Meghan didn’t take him anywhere they, with the exception of Charles who was open to the half in/half out, they booted him. BRF does not seem like they never get too attached to married ins likely because of all the divorces (with the exception of Edward’s beard Sophie).

Np. I could see Meghan telling the Royal family when they could see Archie. You know " boundaries" that you all talk about. Or she would want "privacy" to bond as a new family of three.

Exactly. I think it was all Meghan's wishes. It's very telling when the only family member attending your wedding is your mother. Why do you think his cousin's wouldn't love Archie? Or Prince Charles? Or his aunt and uncle? Obviously, by now they barely know him. And once M &H left for Canada in the fall 2019 (well before covid indeed!), Meghan actively kept the grandkid from Harry's family - even when the couple flew back to England, they left Archie behind.

[Anonymous]

I'm glad that M&H decided to snip the last strings and officially give back the remaining royal patronages. Watch the royal rota implode now that their cash cows are officially gone.

Meg still has Mayhew, Smartworks and Luminary and Harry has Invictus and Sentabale. Along with the U.S projects and commitments, they will be plenty busy.

[Anonymous]

The grift is over.

[Anonymous]

M&H didn't even want the 12 month review..the Queen insisted on leaving the door open. They have quashed the rr's ability to hold the remaining patonages over their heads.

[Anonymous]

I'm happy for Meghan and Harry. I think he has struggled with mental health in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm glad that M&H decided to snip the last strings and officially give back the remaining royal patronages. Watch the royal rota implode now that their cash cows are officially gone.

Meg still has Mayhew, Smartworks and Luminary and Harry has Invictus and Sentabale. Along with the U.S projects and commitments, they will be plenty busy.

Yep. Wow - Meghan and Harry can no longer show up for a 10-minute ribbon cutting. I do feel bad for the patronage’s and hope they can get a royal who will fundraise for them and see them more than once every seven years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The grift is over.

Nah, the BM will always find a way to grift.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm glad that M&H decided to snip the last strings and officially give back the remaining royal patronages. Watch the royal rota implode now that their cash cows are officially gone.

Meg still has Mayhew, Smartworks and Luminary and Harry has Invictus and Sentabale. Along with the U.S projects and commitments, they will be plenty busy.

Yep. Wow - Meghan and Harry can no longer show up for a 10-minute ribbon cutting. I do feel bad for the patronage’s and hope they can get a royal who will fundraise for them and see them more than once every seven years.

At least one charity asked that Meg continue on as a non-royal patron. But the Queen, as petty as ever, said no..not if they want a royal patron. I think that after some time, that just may happen. Because even as non-working royals, M&H still bring more attention to organizations than the remaining working royals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm glad that M&H decided to snip the last strings and officially give back the remaining royal patronages. Watch the royal rota implode now that their cash cows are officially gone.

Meg still has Mayhew, Smartworks and Luminary and Harry has Invictus and Sentabale. Along with the U.S projects and commitments, they will be plenty busy.

Yep. Wow - Meghan and Harry can no longer show up for a 10-minute ribbon cutting. I do feel bad for the patronage’s and hope they can get a royal who will fundraise for them and see them more than once every seven years.

At least one charity asked that Meg continue on as a non-royal patron. But the Queen, as petty as ever, said no..not if they want a royal patron. I think that after some time, that just may happen. Because even as non-working royals, M&H still bring more attention to organizations than the remaining working royals.

But they're not there. They've left the country, literally.

They unroyaled themselves. They won't be showing up for tea. They're gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm glad that M&H decided to snip the last strings and officially give back the remaining royal patronages. Watch the royal rota implode now that their cash cows are officially gone.

Meg still has Mayhew, Smartworks and Luminary and Harry has Invictus and Sentabale. Along with the U.S projects and commitments, they will be plenty busy.

Yep. Wow - Meghan and Harry can no longer show up for a 10-minute ribbon cutting. I do feel bad for the patronage’s and hope they can get a royal who will fundraise for them and see them more than once every seven years.

At least one charity asked that Meg continue on as a non-royal patron. But the Queen, as petty as ever, said no..not if they want a royal patron. I think that after some time, that just may happen. Because even as non-working royals, M&H still bring more attention to organizations than the remaining working royals.

I know. It was actually the most prestigious of them as well. The National Theater asking for Meghan to remain their Patron is the equivalent to the Kennedy Center begging her to Chair their board. She didn’t even have time to launch a mega-fundraiser project for them like she did 2-3 of her other patronage’s in such a short time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm glad that M&H decided to snip the last strings and officially give back the remaining royal patronages. Watch the royal rota implode now that their cash cows are officially gone.

Meg still has Mayhew, Smartworks and Luminary and Harry has Invictus and Sentabale. Along with the U.S projects and commitments, they will be plenty busy.

Yep. Wow - Meghan and Harry can no longer show up for a 10-minute ribbon cutting. I do feel bad for the patronage’s and hope they can get a royal who will fundraise for them and see them more than once every seven years.

At least one charity asked that Meg continue on as a non-royal patron. But the Queen, as petty as ever, said no..not if they want a royal patron. I think that after some time, that just may happen. Because even as non-working royals, M&H still bring more attention to organizations than the remaining working royals.

But they're not there. They've left the country, literally.

They unroyaled themselves. They won't be showing up for tea. They're gone.

The rest of the royals are hiding in their palaces literally. They’ve barely been seen in public (or for tea) since Meghan+Harry left.