GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want to see Trump go down, you have to be enraged that Willis/Wade, relatively unintelligent, lazy, inexperienced and palpably crooked prosecutors, were selected to handle this case. There are hundreds, maybe more than a thousand, highly intelligent, experienced, deadly serious and honest Democrat-oriented prosecutors and civil trial attorneys who would have done this trial for little or no pay. This entire disqualification catastrophe would never have happened -- even a relatively unintelligent, inexperienced prosecutor would know not to hire their married lover as a lawyer, let alone the lead lawyer, on this case bc of exactly this disqualification circus.

Willis was not “selected” to handle the case. She’s the DA for Fulton county. She is the only person in the world who has authority bring state criminal charges for crimes committed in Fulton county.

Willis CHOSE to bring this case. And, some wonder what role the WH had in encouraging her to bring charges considering the background of Jeff DiSantis, the Deputing DA and spokesperson for Fulton County.
There is nothing illegal about Trump urging Raffensperger to investigate the election results especially considering the shenanigans that went on the evening of the election.

Someone helping his campaign found over 30,000 illegal votes. Find 11980 or whatever, was just Trump saying you need to look thru this 30000 and find we are right on that many.
People voting from UPS store mailboxes. People who filed change of address with the post office.


Trump was caught on tape telling him to find more votes. You’re insane PP. Trump is guilty AF. The election was clean. Your guy lost. Don’t let him drag you down into thinking otherwise. You look like a total fool.

Votes or illegal votes?

Exactly. "Find more votes" = do a recount and investigate the shenanigans.

LOL, no. He specified the exact number of votes and if you actually listen to the recording you know exactly what he is saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Exactly. "Find more votes" = do a recount and investigate the shenanigans.

LOL, no. He specified the exact number of votes and if you actually listen to the recording you know exactly what he is saying.

Someone helping his campaign found over 30,000 illegal votes. Find 11980 or whatever, was just Trump saying you need to look thru this 30000 and find we are right on that many.
People voting from UPS store mailboxes. People who filed change of address with the post office.

[Anonymous]

Man, the guy was so bitter he was shi*talking the daughter! Telling people she flunked out of school, etc.

There was bad blood for sure. But as soon as he put his hand on that Bible he had to stop talking smack and stick to exactly what he actually knew. All that attorney client privilege stuff was him trying to cover his own butt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thread of text messages between Merchant and Bradley.

Just read a few of them and then try to tell us that Terrence Bradley was truthful and candid on the stand yesterday.

The thread is 20 posts long. I just posted the first 4. They get better as the thread continues.

Bradley's testimony and supposed evidence is falling apart - https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/terrence-bradley-texts-fani-willis/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Exactly. "Find more votes" = do a recount and investigate the shenanigans.

LOL, no. He specified the exact number of votes and if you actually listen to the recording you know exactly what he is saying.

Someone helping his campaign found over 30,000 illegal votes. Find 11980 or whatever, was just Trump saying you need to look thru this 30000 and find we are right on that many.
People voting from UPS store mailboxes. People who filed change of address with the post office.
No, they didn’t. They made false claims about finding fraudulent votes. They were unable to provide Georgia courts with evidence of this kind of widespread fraud. They filed 6 lawsuits and got nowhere because fraud on a large scale wasn’t actually found.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thread of text messages between Merchant and Bradley.

Just read a few of them and then try to tell us that Terrence Bradley was truthful and candid on the stand yesterday.

The thread is 20 posts long. I just posted the first 4. They get better as the thread continues.

Bradley's testimony and supposed evidence is falling apart - https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/terrence-bradley-texts-fani-willis/index.html

Yep. Text messages are showing that Bradley was evasive and lacked candor and that he knew much more than he testified to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thread of text messages between Merchant and Bradley.

Just read a few of them and then try to tell us that Terrence Bradley was truthful and candid on the stand yesterday.

The thread is 20 posts long. I just posted the first 4. They get better as the thread continues.

Bradley's testimony and supposed evidence is falling apart - https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/terrence-bradley-texts-fani-willis/index.html

Yep. Text messages are showing that Bradley was evasive and lacked candor and that he knew much more than he testified to.

The texts reveal that he and Merchant were secretly scheming for months in advance, but also reveal that Bradley ultimately did not have solid corroborating evidence against Wade and Willis.

Bradley is a problem - for Merchant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thread of text messages between Merchant and Bradley.

Just read a few of them and then try to tell us that Terrence Bradley was truthful and candid on the stand yesterday.

The thread is 20 posts long. I just posted the first 4. They get better as the thread continues.

Bradley's testimony and supposed evidence is falling apart - https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/terrence-bradley-texts-fani-willis/index.html

Yep. Text messages are showing that Bradley was evasive and lacked candor and that he knew much more than he testified to.

The texts reveal that he and Merchant were secretly scheming for months in advance, but also reveal that Bradley ultimately did not have solid corroborating evidence against Wade and Willis.

Bradley is a problem - for Merchant.

"Secretly scheming" means that Bradley was telling Merchant what we all know.... that Willis and Wade had a romantic relationship beginning much earlier than they testified.

[Anonymous]

The judge has to decide whether or not Bradley lied in court or lied in text messages. The penalty for lying to the judge is prison. What is the penalty for lying to Merchant?

[Anonymous]

Apparently Bradley was also endangering the DA's safety by revealing details on her security team????

[Anonymous]

Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

[Anonymous]

Bradley felt like they looked down on him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

Another theory.......
He knows good and well that the relationship between Wade and Willis started long before they testified. And, all the information he gave to Merchant in the texts was true and accurate.
But, he knows if he reveals the truth, he will be burning bridges and closing the door to work in Fulton County. If he maintains the charade of pretending that he has no knowledge of their relationship, he may get work thrown at him from the DA's office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

Looks like that to me. He gave her a lot of names and said to subpoena all of them. He may have been hoping someone had facts where he only had speculation? And that is also why he asked to be concealed. I'm sure the defense went to all of those people and got nothing. That's why they dragged him up. They couldn't corroborate anything he said. Goose eggs.