Plane crash DCA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

You know 2/3 of the people on that helicopter were men. Why are you only curious about the woman's qualifications and training?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

You know 2/3 of the people on that helicopter were men. Why are you only curious about the woman's qualifications and training?

Because she was the one flying it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

You know 2/3 of the people on that helicopter were men. Why are you only curious about the woman's qualifications and training?

Because she was the one flying it

Give me a break. Your default is to trust white men and to mistrust anyone else.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

You know 2/3 of the people on that helicopter were men. Why are you only curious about the woman's qualifications and training?

Because she was the one flying it

Give me a break. Your default is to trust white men and to mistrust anyone else.

The female on the helicopter had been the crew chief sitting in the back, or even at the radio, the name likely would have been released. But she was the one at the controls flying it- yes she has a higher level of accountability

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

You know 2/3 of the people on that helicopter were men. Why are you only curious about the woman's qualifications and training?

Because she was the one flying it

Give me a break. Your default is to trust white men and to mistrust anyone else.

The female on the helicopter had been the crew chief sitting in the back, or even at the radio, the name likely would have been released. But she was the one at the controls flying it- yes she has a higher level of accountability

Who is going to hold her accountable, you? An investigation is being conducted. The results will be released. Neither of those two things requires you to know her name. So what is it that is bothering you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

You know 2/3 of the people on that helicopter were men. Why are you only curious about the woman's qualifications and training?

Because she was the one flying it

Give me a break. Your default is to trust white men and to mistrust anyone else.

The female on the helicopter had been the crew chief sitting in the back, or even at the radio, the name likely would have been released. But she was the one at the controls flying it- yes she has a higher level of accountability

Who is going to hold her accountable, you? An investigation is being conducted. The results will be released. Neither of those two things requires you to know her name. So what is it that is bothering you?

PP is polishing up her pitchfork. Easy to target someone for abuse if you have their name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

Which you are not conducting so…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

So you do not want to know that about the male pilot who was talking with ATC? He did not acknowledge ATC instructions about the plane landing on runway 33. The fingers are pointing to him. He did not listen to ATC about the plane that was coming from the left not down river.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m less concerned about her name than her training, qualifications, performance, and medical history, including mental and emotional health. Those will be essential for the investigation.

Which you are not conducting so…

Trump has already said what the cause is. The “investigation” will be another Republican show trial for DE.

[Anonymous]

I'm hoping someone who is knowledgable about aviation can answer this, but why did the helicopter pilot ask for visual clearance? In the audio you can hear the pilot asking for permission for visual clearance which was approved by the ATC, but why? What would it be beneficial to the pilot?

[Anonymous]

With all of the local workers on here from Langley and Ft. Belvoir, I am surprised no one knows her name. The rumor mill has got to be blazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With all of the local workers on here from Langley and Ft. Belvoir, I am surprised no one knows her name. The rumor mill has got to be blazing.

Her name is out there, but I won't share it. I think this is the wrong way to play this, personally. Hiding it implies Trump was right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With all of the local workers on here from Langley and Ft. Belvoir, I am surprised no one knows her name. The rumor mill has got to be blazing.

If the name would add anything to the desired narrative, it would be out already. Seems like leaving people to stew with the knowledge that there is a woman in the mix is all the cards they've got to play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With all of the local workers on here from Langley and Ft. Belvoir, I am surprised no one knows her name. The rumor mill has got to be blazing.

Her name is out there, but I won't share it. I think this is the wrong way to play this, personally. Hiding it implies Trump was right.

+1