Glen Youngkin...

[Anonymous]

Have you seen the recent TV ad for Youngkin? A large group of old white men are walking together to one direction but Youngkin walks through them toward opposite direction. Does the ad try to show Youngkin is different from the old white men?

[Anonymous]

Youngkin has clearly said he believes Biden was legitimately elected. What the left cynically demands is for R candidates to reject any and all concerns about election integrity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you seen the recent TV ad for Youngkin? A large group of old white men are walking together to one direction but Youngkin walks through them toward opposite direction. Does the ad try to show Youngkin is different from the old white men?

McAuliffe is an older, tired white man than Youngkin, doofus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrat for younkin here. Enough with the wacky school policies & closures, thanks. Local democrats have made this year a living hell.

Has there ever been a more ridiculous bunch than the lunatic Democrats on the FCPS School Board and Board of Supervisors or the clowns put in charge of running the VDOE?

I absolutely will be voting for Youngkin to restore some balance and sanity to Virginia governance.

"balance" He is not "balanced".

He supports the guy trying to overthrow the government of the US ie Democracy for Fascism. So glad you support that garbage.

Not to mention he has zero solutions for anything. No policies, just grifting and scamming.

Only idiots would support him. He is a Nazi in plain clothes.

Ex Republican here,NEVER AGAIN EVER.

Enjoy your new religion. The Nazi comparison suggests you’re out of touch with reality right now, but you may realize eventually it’s not quite so awesome.

Yep. Anyone who makes Nazi comparisons like this cannot be taken seriously and everything they say should be called into question.

Oh man, if only you guys applied that same logic to Republicans who refuse to denounce the Big Lie.

"Denouncing the Big Lie" has become the litmus test among the far-left for people for running for any position these days.

I want a Virginia governor who will pay attention to the state, just like I'd like to have a school board that would pay attention to the local public schools. Not another clone like McAuliffe whose every statement is calculated and made with an eye towards getting a 99% approval rating from The Nation.

McAuliffe did pay attention to the commonwealth for four years. How did it do? How did you do?

Crickets. Meanwhile, Youngkin himself did great while McAuliffe was Governor, and said so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin has clearly said he believes Biden was legitimately elected. What the left cynically demands is for R candidates to reject any and all concerns about election integrity.

What the left demands is proof that election integrity is actually a problem, so far none has been produced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:based on his own website, can anyone find any stance on any issue?

https://www.youngkinforgovernor.com

The closest that I can find is a link to join his election integrity task force (someone owes Orwell royalties for that name).

Bump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin has clearly said he believes Biden was legitimately elected. What the left cynically demands is for R candidates to reject any and all concerns about election integrity.

Only AFTER he got the nomination. He was pushing "election integrity" right up until that moment.

Spineless GOP tool.

Hard pass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin has clearly said he believes Biden was legitimately elected. What the left cynically demands is for R candidates to reject any and all concerns about election integrity.

LOL, this "leftist" cynic actually used to work for the Republican party. What I'm actually looking for is someone who will not weasel like this:

“I don’t think he’s coming this year,” Mr. Youngkin said in response to a question of whether he wanted Mr. Trump to campaign with him.

“I don’t think his schedule is — I think he has his schedule and is set to go to other places,” Mr. Youngkin tried again.

But, he was asked a second time, did he want to stand with Mr. Trump in Virginia?

“I think if he were to come, fine; if he doesn’t come, fine,” Mr. Youngkin said, settling on an answer.

Mr. Youngkin was more direct when asked if he still thought Mr. Trump was the leader of the G.O.P. “I don’t think there’s such a thing as a leader of our party,” he said.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but bagman Terry is the one who kept a black woman from getting the nomination for Governor in VA, which would have been a first in the state.

He's a huckster and a fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, but bagman Terry is the one who kept a black woman from getting the nomination for Governor in VA, which would have been a first in the state.

He's a huckster and a fraud.

yes, so let's vote for the party actively suppressing minority votes

[Anonymous]

Let's vote for the candidate who has made his money honestly in business rather than simply by capitalizing on his political connections to the Clintons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's vote for the candidate who has made his money honestly in business rather than simply by capitalizing on his political connections to the Clintons.

He made his money at the private-equity firm Carlyle Group. That might (or might not) be making his money legally, but it's not making his money honestly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you seen the recent TV ad for Youngkin? A large group of old white men are walking together to one direction but Youngkin walks through them toward opposite direction. Does the ad try to show Youngkin is different from the old white men?

Yeah, not sure what message that ad is trying to convey. "I'm an old white man walking in the opposite direction from the other old white men"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's vote for the candidate who has made his money honestly in business rather than simply by capitalizing on his political connections to the Clintons.

He made his money at the private-equity firm Carlyle Group. That might (or might not) be making his money legally, but it's not making his money honestly.

I'm always entertained by the fact that there's one side of the political spectrum that continues to embrace the Clintons. And it's not the left.

[Anonymous]

McAuliffe will always be part of the detritus of the Clinton machine. He lacks morals or principles, and those who defend him do so out of expediency with a heavy dose of cynicism.