Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The people who were chasing him could have felt their life was in imminent danger. The dude was armed and loaded and was not a policeman. How did anyone know he wasn't going to start a mass shooting? Any aggression toward him was done in self-defense."

This.

No. Open carry and being locked and loaded *in and of itself* cannot trigger self defense or it would be open season on anybody who open carries. Clearly, that’s the wrong outcome. Imminent for self defense purposes has generally meant right away or concurrent. So, if it is 8 am and you believe your neighbor is going to shoot you at 5 pm, you can’t act in self defense at noon. Generally, imminent means about to happen right now.

Walking around with a gun in your hand in public is an aggressive act. You can't walk into the grocery store or a school or a church carrying a gun without eliciting the fight or flight response from most people.

Also, he had already killed someone? That seems....relevant?

In normal times the dudes who chased him down would be heroes for trying to stop a murderer from getting away, but here we are.

Relevant to what? That gave them the right to chase him, forcibly disarm him, kick him while on the ground, try to hit him in the head at full force with a skateboard, pull a gun on him?

Uh...yeah. Isn’t that the whole premise of the good guy with a gun argument? Or is there now suddenly some addendum related to needing absolute proof that he will shoot again?

If a shooter shoots kids in a classroom and then walks down the hall, is he leaving or going to another classroom to kill more people? How is anyone supposed to answer that? Where did this requirement come from? You stop the murderer however you can. That’s what sane, brave people do.

Do you even hear yourself?! Really, stop, I’m genuinely concerned for your soul.

NP. Nobody believes the premise of your argument because this is not an active shooter situation. How is this an active shooter if he only shot one person and then stopped shooting? Just give it up.

You can read his mind and know that he already had his scalp and was ready to go home peacefully. That the bystanders had no reasonable fear but just attacked him for the lolz.

Would a jury of his peers have the same telepathic knowledge? Or would they think the bystanders had a reasonable fear of death or bodily harm from the kid?

Of course they should have had a reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury. They appeared to be unarmed and were attacking a killer with an assault rifle. You are really desperate, still sticking to your story of an active shooter. Save the police work for actual police. If you choose to take big risks, you might pay for it with your life.

Yeah you might. But your own stupidity doesn't give somebody the right to shoot you.

That depends on what your stupidity causes you to do. There were multiple attacker coming after him and it looked like one of them attempted to strike him with something. And someone said that one of the attackers was armed with a gun, though I didn't see one in the video. It doesn't really matter anyway because a jury will determine if it its self defense.

Yes a jury will determine it. And it will depend in large part on whether they believe Rittenhouse reasonably believed he was in imminent danger at that moment. I am sure he did believe that. It will not depend on whether the jury believes people were stupid for chasing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

He had a medical kit and was asking about the injured. It’s on one of the videos. You are bending the truth and becoming a part of a tribal mob.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the story on his parents?

White mom, possibly single, posted photos of her underage son with guns. Health care worker.

That’s it? No speculations about what a terrible parent she is? No questions about her competency or comments about her family’s probable history of violence and alcohol/drug use? What’s the holdup why the delay in discussion about family values and cultural influences that led this murdering thug to kill?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

He had a medical kit and was asking about the injured. It’s on one of the videos. You are bending the truth and becoming a part of a tribal mob.

You’re almost unbelievably gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

He had a medical kit and was asking about the injured. It’s on one of the videos. You are bending the truth and becoming a part of a tribal mob.

You’re almost unbelievably gullible.

I saw it on video where he was asking if anyone needed medical aid. Watch it for yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

No, the gloves prove nothing. The shooter was interviewed that same night before the shooting explaining he was kitted out as a medic.

[Anonymous]

By the logic of this kid's defenders, Omar Mateen's first victim in Pulse was a real murder, sure, but his subsequent shots might all be "self defense" as people rushed him after he started shooting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

No, the gloves prove nothing. The shooter was interviewed that same night before the shooting explaining he was kitted out as a medic.

A medical kit AND AN AR-15

[Anonymous]

Both videos are classic self defense, he is running away from assailants that are trying to cause undo harm. The charges were to appease the blm rioters, they won't stick. if you can't defend yourself we are screwed especially now that police are being told to not intervene and are being defunded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

He had a medical kit and was asking about the injured. It’s on one of the videos. You are bending the truth and becoming a part of a tribal mob.

He also had a gun and shot people and was caught on camera saying he shot people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:By the logic of this kid's defenders, Omar Mateen's first victim in Pulse was a real murder, sure, but his subsequent shots might all be "self defense" as people rushed him after he started shooting

It’s not “defending the kid” to be honest about what the video shows. The kid was already being attacked before he shot the first guy.

I can be pro gun control, anti Trump, think that the cops are inept AND also be honest about what I see. I actually want to understand how this violence occurred so that I have a greater understanding in life. It worries me how tribal everyone has become and that everyone seems willing to ignore inconvenient facts kist to support their chosen “team”. Trump has somehow gotten the democrats to be willing to stoop to such a low level that it really bothers me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By the logic of this kid's defenders, Omar Mateen's first victim in Pulse was a real murder, sure, but his subsequent shots might all be "self defense" as people rushed him after he started shooting

It’s not “defending the kid” to be honest about what the video shows. The kid was already being attacked before he shot the first guy.

I can be pro gun control, anti Trump, think that the cops are inept AND also be honest about what I see. I actually want to understand how this violence occurred so that I have a greater understanding in life. It worries me how tribal everyone has become and that everyone seems willing to ignore inconvenient facts kist to support their chosen “team”. Trump has somehow gotten the democrats to be willing to stoop to such a low level that it really bothers me.

So you agree that Trump is the source of our nation’s chaos?

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is he wearing latex gloves? It's not a virus thing because he's not wearing a mask.

I would guess he’s thinking of fingerprints.

That just proves premeditation. I'm against the death penalty for one so young but I hope he gets 50 years and I hope he has lots of Black cell mates.

He had a medical kit and was asking about the injured. It’s on one of the videos. You are bending the truth and becoming a part of a tribal mob.

He also had a gun and shot people and was caught on camera saying he shot people.

Yes but I don’t believe that the gloves were for fingerprints like asserted above. These leaps of logic from some people are not helpful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By the logic of this kid's defenders, Omar Mateen's first victim in Pulse was a real murder, sure, but his subsequent shots might all be "self defense" as people rushed him after he started shooting

It’s not “defending the kid” to be honest about what the video shows. The kid was already being attacked before he shot the first guy.

I can be pro gun control, anti Trump, think that the cops are inept AND also be honest about what I see. I actually want to understand how this violence occurred so that I have a greater understanding in life. It worries me how tribal everyone has become and that everyone seems willing to ignore inconvenient facts kist to support their chosen “team”. Trump has somehow gotten the democrats to be willing to stoop to such a low level that it really bothers me.

So you agree that Trump is the source of our nation’s chaos?

I agree.

Absolutely 1000% but I want to be on the side of honest people, not a tribal mob.