Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
I am a parent at the school. Discussing it on a message board and raising it internally are not mutually exclusive. |
| +1. I know it is a shocker on this board, but it is helpful to know what you are talking about. |
This is what I’d like to know. Does the office go the extra mile In pushing for it students or does it just say “times are different” and let the chips fall where they may with no responsibility for pushing qualified candidates? |
If only there were open sessions for parents to ask such questions of the staff
Hint, there are, look for them in the weekly emails, or hey, send an email and ask! |
of course not, but only one is likely to lead to any sort of meaningful answer. |
US Sidwell parent here. If there's one thing I've learned it's this: Sidwell administrators NEVER say anything of substance to parents, either in public "coffees" or in private in their office. They are masters of deflection. |
We also had a child at Georgetown Day. The GDS CCO was not reluctant at all to pick up the phone and strongly advocate for GDS students with admission officers at colleges'universities where the CCO believed that the students could do the work and would be a good fit. |
Then why do you read and comment on this message board? Just to blindly and reflexively defend everything about the school? |
to annoy people like you, mostly. And to remind myself why we're glad we didn't send our kids to Sidwell. Sidwell does sound like it sucks if you have to resort to DCUM for answers. |
+1 |
As usual, GDS folks trying to turn a Sidwell thread into one about them. Posers. |
GDS may have its own challenges but I’ve heard very good things about their college counseling operation. Maybe Sidwell Friends could learn a thing or two from what they are doing. |
|
Having gone thru this process with multiple kids lately, I’d like to share my experience. I used to clamor for transparency in the college matriculation lists and thought it would be helpful in figuring out where my DC might end up. If for instance, 6 girls from Visi went to Dartmouth over the past 2 yrs then I figured my daughter had a good chance. But what I realized is that the matriculation lists just aren’t that different between the top local high schools. The only major difference being that the Catholic schools send more kids to places like ND, BC etc. What we didn’t fully appreciate until going thru the process is that most of the kids that go to name colleges truly have hooks (sports, URM, big time donors or connections etc). The rest of us are at such a disadvantage and there’s nothing we or our high schools can really do about it. I still wish the high schools would release the matriculation info because, by not doing so, it creates a sense of suspicion.
We heard all this before we applied but it didn’t really sink in until we experienced it. By the way, I’ve heard few if any parents from any schools say they were particularly happy with their CCO. |
| Most of these preferences and hooks have become a joke. Legacy - what’s the value? Recruited athletes - see the Varsity Blues case. URM? Is a white person from Argentina considered Hispanic? Someone whose family came from Spain? Spain by way of Mexico? Is a mixed-race AA-Caucasian student entitled to a URM preference? Only half a preference? Under the “Elizabeth Warren test” can’t pretty much anyone claim to be a URM? Many popular DNA analysis results show a little bit of genetic material from everywhere. The whole thing is basically broken. |
|
You mean like hooks that get kids into private schools?
|