well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

Exactly. Unbelievable that this has to be explained again and again to these morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

How, exactly, do you suggest investigating a 35 yr. old allegation? Anyone who might have some information has been invited (repeatedly) to come forward. No one has. No one can corroborate this allegation. In the meantime, Kavanaugh has had six FBI investigations, all of which turned up nothing. No one is trying to "tear down" Blasey Ford, but you simply can't argue with the FACT that she had no evidence or witnesses to back up her claim.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile, Justin Fairfax has TWO credible accusers who are armed with fact after fact - dates, times, places, witnesses - to back up their allegations that he raped them. And yet, Fairfax hasn't been charged with anything and remains in office. No outrage over that, amirite, liberals?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

It is the height of idiocy to "investigate" a 35 yr. old claim of groping. I mean, seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

It is the height of idiocy to "investigate" a 35 yr. old claim of groping. I mean, seriously?

Not a surprising attitude from a MAGA. Don’t care about truth, facts, or morals. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

+1,000,000
They really are. And so transparent, too - their whole beef is with the fact that he's a conservative. Because, really - do you think they would *ever* be outraged about some vague, decades old accusation that a liberal had possibly groped someone? In high school? Absolutely not. They'd blow it off like it was the dumbest thing ever. Which it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?



Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

+1

Also, to first PP, please explain just one of Ford's claims--that she only talked about testifying with her "beach friends." Makes one wonder, when it turns out that her "beach friend" was her former roommate (you know, the one she helped with the polygraph test before she became an FBI agent?) Oh yes, this FBI agent also worked for Preet Bahara in SDNY--a vocal Trump critic.
And, then, there was this: please explain why she couldn't come earlier because she was afraid of flying--and yet, she had just flown to the East Coast the month before and was in the DMV area at that time.

There are many other things we can tear apart about her testimony--but, that is likely found in a very, very long thread about Kavanaugh.

Yes. Excellent points.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

Facts? Truth?
How about presumption of innocence? Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims. Zilch.
She had no facts. And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth. Not THE truth.

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

Oh, FFS.
I am not going to relitigate this whole issue........
Suffice it to make a few point.....
1. Kavanaugh went through 7 FBI background investigations. These are quite thorough. Not one accusation such as the one Blasey Ford threw at him came up. All the women who had worked with him and clerked for him only had praises and glowing statements.
2. Daggers out? Nobody has "daggers out." We are just sick of the FALSE - yes - FALSE accusations thrown at him. Like him chasing women around the desk. You people are insufferable.

1. LOL that you think they are “thorough” or would cover an incident like this. Did FoxNews tell you that? Gullible fool.

2. “appears to be early onset dementia patient” = lame attempt to tear her down

I wouldn’t want my DD on his basketball team.

Well, good thing your DD won't be playing on his basketball team.
And, how do I know about FBI background checks? My spouse has been through 3. They are thorough.
They also check on alcohol consumption - something liberals have repeated over and over - with no evidence whatsoever - that is a problem for Kavanaugh.
Face it - the liberals were going to go to any length to derail his nomination. Your efforts almost paid off. Glad Trump stood strong.

Same here. And before this whole debacle, I didn't even consider myself a strong "conservative." I absolutely do now, though, thanks to the liberal circus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think everything about kavanagh is true. He was a blackout drunk in HS who did assault girls. I also think it’s true he is an upstanding husband and devoted father. His friends who know him now and defend him as they know him are also right. This is what’s hard for people to get, even the best guy is capable of horrible behavior in certain situations.

I do not think he is an upstanding husband. I think it’s footage of his nomination in which she flinches at his touch. We all saw his anger.

You are an absolute moron. She didn't "flinch at his touch." My goodness. And his anger? You bet he was angry. I'd be furious if I was smeared by an entire group of lawmakers simply because they didn't want to confirm me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think everything about kavanagh is true. He was a blackout drunk in HS who did assault girls. I also think it’s true he is an upstanding husband and devoted father. His friends who know him now and defend him as they know him are also right. This is what’s hard for people to get, even the best guy is capable of horrible behavior in certain situations.

I do not think he is an upstanding husband. I think it’s footage of his nomination in which she flinches at his touch. We all saw his anger.

What do you want --a robot?

His wife likely likes him just fine.

How would you feel if you were falsely accused? If your spouse were falsely accused?

+1
You'll never get a truthful answer from the PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

It is the height of idiocy to "investigate" a 35 yr. old claim of groping. I mean, seriously?

Not a surprising attitude from a MAGA. Don’t care about truth, facts, or morals. Got it.

How do you feel about the Justin Fairfax accusations, in which there are plenty of facts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

It is the height of idiocy to "investigate" a 35 yr. old claim of groping. I mean, seriously?

Not a surprising attitude from a MAGA. Don’t care about truth, facts, or morals. Got it.

How do you feel about the Justin Fairfax accusations, in which there are plenty of facts?

Deafening silence from the left. Surprise, surprise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

It is the height of idiocy to "investigate" a 35 yr. old claim of groping. I mean, seriously?

Not a surprising attitude from a MAGA. Don’t care about truth, facts, or morals. Got it.

How do you feel about the Justin Fairfax accusations, in which there are plenty of facts?

Conduct an investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night?

Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

And the facts/truth are what, exactly? Do tell.

We will never know. No investigation.

It is the height of idiocy to "investigate" a 35 yr. old claim of groping. I mean, seriously?

Not a surprising attitude from a MAGA. Don’t care about truth, facts, or morals. Got it.

How do you feel about the Justin Fairfax accusations, in which there are plenty of facts?

Deafening silence from the left. Surprise, surprise.

Sorry you were stuck home on a Saturday night.