Reply to well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“Falsely accused”. You seem pretty sure about that. Were you there that night? 
[/quote]
Don’t need to be. Blasey ford appeared to be an early onset dementia patient.
She certainly didn’t convince any republicans.[/quote]

MAGAs don’t care about facts or truth so no surprise there.

[/quote]

Facts?  Truth?  
How about presumption of innocence?  Blasey Ford was unable to provide any actual proof of her claims.  Zilch.  
She had no facts.  And, it appeared that her truth was just that - HER truth.  Not THE truth.  [/quote]

We will never know since it will never be investigated. So you can’t say if he was “falsely” accused or not. But the MAGAs still will try to tear her down.

Why are the daggers out? Afraid of the truth?

[/quote]

How, exactly, do you suggest investigating a 35 yr. old allegation?  Anyone who might have some information has been invited (repeatedly) to come forward.  No one has.  No one can corroborate this allegation.  In the meantime, Kavanaugh has had six FBI investigations, all of which turned up nothing.  No one is trying to "tear down" Blasey Ford, but you simply can't argue with the FACT that she had no evidence or witnesses to back up her claim.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics