
It’s being added to his background investigation by the FBI. No one’s going after him with pitchforks. Only one side wants to pretend this isn’t real - and that’s the GOP. |
Two drunk teens have a sloppy encounter at a high school party. Thirty years later one is bitter and wound up in politics and weaves a little fantasy in her head. Or just makes it up entirely. Either way this is a joke. |
Well - as a lawyer myself, I believe in courts and investigations. I think this should be investigated. And if there's merit to the accusation, I think that Kavanaugh should not take the seat on the Sup Ct. Funny - as I recall, there were plenty of folks like you who thought we shouldn't even bother checking into the Roy Moore accusations. Look where that got you. I'd say Republicans can continue to count on losing women's votes if you continue to ignore accusations against your superstars. |
Laughable coming from someone who supports the Birther, Pizzagate, emailzzzzzz and all the other unfounded crap conspiracies that has fueled the right for more than a decade. |
Ok, so if 45 anonymous sex accusations are made tomorrow against democratic US senators, you will be demanding their resignations, right? |
I talked to Merrick Garland about it and he said it's fine |
Feel free to investigate after he is confirmed. If you wanted to investigate it before confirmation Feinstein shouldn’t have waited until the 11th hour. |
I'm a Republican so I think that anyone who has sex accusations made against them should get a promotion. That's how I am going to win back women! |
Due process, folks! That's how it works for Republicans. Let the white guy take what is his due - a job for the rest of his life, deciding law and policy for the whole country - and if some pesky little sexual assault charge turns out to have merit then we can write some very angry blog posts about it. Republicans' slogan: If you're a white man, we've got your back, bro. |
Ok, so your position is that anonymous sex accusations are only disqualifying for republican men. Got it. |
Because, god forbid, there are people , especially moderate Democrat women, out there like me who do not think it is right to accuse virtually all students at all boys schools of sexual assault and do not think it's right to make 11th hour allegations without substantiating them in any meaningful way. And, if I "truly cared about women's safety" I would believe this craziness??? |
No no, you misunderstand. My position is that it's never disqualifying and should never be investigated. |
No, you can impeach him. Which requires actual *evidence* at an impeachment trial. That’s how the constitution works. Maybe you can have Gloria Aldred be the impeachment counsel. |
Lol. If Democrats really believed the “1 in 4 college girls is raped” statistic then it would be wildly irresponsible to let their daughters attend universities. But of course they know it’s bogus. |
Only one Sup Ct justice has ever been impeached and it was in 1805. It's not exactly a seamless process. I would posit that the better process is to investigate this allegation - and if it turns out to be as NBD as you say, then your boi Brett has nothing to worry about. If it turns out not to be as NBD as you say, then he never takes the seat. |