So you can't give me a citation? No? Ok then. There are real and current issues of disenfranchisement and deep abuse of Native American communities in the US, but I can't get behind any group taking away an individual's sovereignty to define themselves. Nope. Never. |
Well, you are out you aren't. You don't choose your level of belonging. http://www.cherokee.org/Services/TribalCitizenship/Citizenship.aspx |
Oh bullshit. I am interested and have repeatedly asked you to back up your claims that people of Native American descent aren't allowed to make their own claims about their identity. You're refusing to offer anything besides unsubstantiated hysterics. FWIW I'm mixed, and while one of my backgrounds is European in origin, it's not the predominant side I personally have been brought up with or chosen to associate with. But let me guess - you know me better than my own self, and think you ought to define my own identity for me, right? |
Apparently, Baby Veronica's father, though 1/32 Cherokee, is a member of the nation. Today the Cherokee Nations is nearly 300,000 citizens strong, young and old. To be eligible for Cherokee Nation citizenship, individuals must provide documents connecting them to an enrolled lineal ancestor who is listed on the Dawes Roll with a blood degree. CDIB/Tribal Citizenship is traced through natural parents. In cases of adoption, CDIB/Citizenship must be proven through a biological parent to an ancestor registered on the Dawes Roll. |
NP here. What does Native American heritage have to do with you? Why does anybody have to justify themselves to you? |
Can you point directly to a citation where "you don't choose your level of belonging?" The links you post discuss application *INTO* the Cherokee Nation. They don't discuss basically someone having x-amount of ancestry being forbidden from "opting out" of belonging. From that link, there doesn't seem to be anything indicating that people aren't allowed to choose not to be a part of or not individually recognize their ancestry. |
Nobody has to justify themselves to me. Nobody has to justify their ancestry to anyone. Nobody has the right to choose anyone else's identity belonging, including Veronica. It's hers to decide on her own, likely when she's older. |
Why don't you just contact the Bureau of Indian Affairs for definitive information instead of battling it out here? That's like trying to debate whether you think it should be black, African-American, Negro, Colored, biracial, etc. People define themselves within their communities. Like it or leave it. They have the last say. |
Of course people define themselves - that's exactly what I've been saying. But do you not think people should be allowed to choose their own community/communities? |
|
| ^^^Contacting the Bureau of Indian Affairs for solid, correct information would be too simple. Better to fight it out on DCUM throwing all kinds of information out there, right or wrong. |
| In parenting you cannot just change your mind and suddenly decide you want your kid. The girl belongs with the family that always wanted her and tended to her during the most trying and difficult times (infancy). |
|
8:18 here -- It's not really relevant that Veronica is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, according to the Supreme Court. But to the poster who is concerned about Veronica's self-identification as an adult, she is welcome to self-identify as white, hispanic, Cherokee, or anything. To be a CITIZEN of the Cherokee Nation, which includes certain benefits (monetary, etc.), then you need to qualify, which she does.
What more information do you need, PP? |
Absolutely. We live in communities now but this is different. Some communities are integrated, some not. We are talking about an ethnic group that has rules and regs whose sole purpose is the continuation of the race and to make sure that people who are of Cherokee or any Indian descent are welcomed to be a part of the historical legacy. Sort of like the 'one-drop' rule with African-Americans which the U.S. government said if you have one drop of black blood (doesn't matter how fair skinned you are), you are black. I'm not sure why the Native American legacy is such an issue. A previous poster mentioned Jewish ethnicity. Jews has maintained this ideology since time immemoriam since they were always being annihilated. |
That's an interesting way to look at it. So the one who tends an infant gets to keep it, or only in this instance (where the adoption was finalized quite recently, in the past month)? |