Michael Jackson: Was he Innocent?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the reporter from Hard Copy in the documentary was really annoying but probably right. The prosecution overcomplicated things by adding the conspiracy count and making impossible to prove allegations involving other boys without doing their homework first. You don't allege he abused MC without first asking the kid if he'll testify to that effect.

Posters say that MC had family to protect him but cmon. MC hated his father. Still does. MC had every reason at that trial to come clean on any abuse and blame his father for letting it happen. Yet, he didn't.

It’s already been said here but I will say it again: just because Jackson may not have abused Culkin does not mean that he didn’t abuse anyone.

They choose their victims carefully. It's always the same types, uninvolved parents, vulnerable, easily enticed with gifts. Jackson had the playbook down to a science. Step 1, make your home inviting and a place they want to visit. So he put literal carnival rides in his backyard. It's like he followed the pedo playbook step by step.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This documentary was so bad. It’s obvious there was no case against Michael and they wanted So badly for him to be guilty.

Let the poor man rest in peace. He was innocent.

You think it's normal to order and watch porn featuring men and boys? NAMBLA style? Do any of the men in your life have sleepovers with unrelated kids and build their whole life about enticing them and bestowing gifts on them?

No but they're not Michael Jackson. He was stunted and probably had many mental issues but I still think he was extorted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was 0 child porn!!

He had a pretty large collection of heterosexual porn!!

You guys don’t even know your facts.

That's not what was in the magazine he circled or what his assistant said. He said they watched it together in a "phase" and he was the one who ordered it.

Allegedly!!! No evidence!

I'll take witness testimony. Also the kid described a black suitcase full of porn and lo! Guess what was found when they raided the house? A lucky guess, right?

Lots of men have porn in their bedroom. Are they all pedophiles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This documentary was so bad. It’s obvious there was no case against Michael and they wanted So badly for him to be guilty.

Let the poor man rest in peace. He was innocent.

You think it's normal to order and watch porn featuring men and boys? NAMBLA style? Do any of the men in your life have sleepovers with unrelated kids and build their whole life about enticing them and bestowing gifts on them?

No but they're not Michael Jackson. He was stunted and probably had many mental issues but I still think he was extorted.

Sure did have mental issues. Where there's smoke there's fire here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was 0 child porn!!

He had a pretty large collection of heterosexual porn!!

You guys don’t even know your facts.

That's not what was in the magazine he circled or what his assistant said. He said they watched it together in a "phase" and he was the one who ordered it.

Allegedly!!! No evidence!

I'll take witness testimony. Also the kid described a black suitcase full of porn and lo! Guess what was found when they raided the house? A lucky guess, right?

Lots of men have porn in their bedroom. Are they all pedophiles?

That they share with young boys? What kind of men are in your life?

[Anonymous]

This thread is full of fake news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is full of fake news.

It's giving pedo apologist vibes.