Reply to Michael Jackson: Was he Innocent?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Michael Jackson: Was he Innocent?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I thought the reporter from Hard Copy in the documentary was really annoying but probably right.  The prosecution overcomplicated things by adding the conspiracy count and making impossible to prove allegations involving other boys without doing their homework first.  You don't allege he abused MC without first asking the kid if he'll testify to that effect.

Posters say that MC had family to protect him but cmon.  MC hated his father.  Still does.  MC had every reason at that trial to come clean on any abuse and blame his father for letting it happen.  Yet, he didn't.[/quote]
It’s already been said here but I will say it again: just because Jackson may not have abused Culkin does not mean that he didn’t abuse anyone.[/quote]

They choose their victims carefully. It's always the same types, uninvolved parents, vulnerable, easily enticed with gifts. Jackson had the playbook down to a science. Step 1, make your home inviting and a place they want to visit. So he put literal carnival rides in his backyard. It's like he followed the pedo playbook step by step.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics