Joe Kent Resigns!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This EXPLOSIVE Tucker Kent interview was lame theater. A script written by WWE writers. Over the top Trump bootlicking. Sounds like the telegraphed scheme is to give Trump an off-ramp on this asinine war with Iran (and blame it all on bad advisors and or Bibi).

Doesn't sound telegraphed at all but very much the honest truth. Trump is surrounded and controlled by genocidal warmongering Zionists who want to escalate this war that's terrible for everyone and especially the US but Israel doesn't seem to give a damn.

[Anonymous]

How come Zionists say it's antisemitic to say the US went to war because of Isr if it's said as a criticism, but it isn't antisemitic when Rubio said it?

[Anonymous]

Now it makes sense why Netanyahu had to deny two or three times that Israel wasn't behind Charlie Kirk's death. Kent was blocked from investigating the assassination by some "foreign nexus"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is beyond pathetic and embarrassing that CNN, likely via the Jerusalem censorship desk, obviously issued coded language about Joe Kent that Kaitlin Collins and other evening hosts were required to use, verbatim, to blunt the impact of his resignation letter.

Pathetic. Embarrassing. And beyond.

To add to this, and also in response to the poster that followed it …

John Bolton on CNN tonight played the same approved game - stating that Kent’s statements are anti-semitism.

After we all saw with our own eyes and heard with our own ears as Marco Rubio, Trump himself, and others stated on camera and unequivocally in the first few days of the war that Israel’s intent absolutely forced our involvement. They said it. Basically the entire administration. And now they think they can walk it back and say “No, no, no, that’s not what we meant”?

CNN is wall-to-wall Zionists. Who in the hell watches it thinking they're watching journalism rather than a daily proctology exam for Israel w/ everyone's head shoved so far up its ass?

I know. I cannot count the number of times I’ve concluded in watching CNN over the past few years that I just don’t want to hear anything from any Zionist about any matter involving Israel.

Just listening to Jason Rantz trying to shoehorn the other panelists tonight into agreeing with him that holding Israel accountable for the disastrous OIF is “insane conspiracy theory” that only deranged people would consider. The looks back at him were great, but still.

Beach, it’s a fact, not insane and not a conspiracy theory.

I esp. love those who want to say it's Qatar with the real influence over US FP. LOL. Like, the largest US military base is in Qatar and Israel bombed Qatar months back (people forget that) and all Isr had to do was call and apologize. Qatar is getting no real protection for the $ they pay the US while Israel gets endless control over both domestic and foreign policy and the American taxpayer pays for it.

Think about the fact that the US taxpayer has paid Israel and its demons in America, to destroy Americans' rights. It's insane. We have our lives ruined if we boycott one foreign country and it ain't Qatar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now it makes sense why Netanyahu had to deny two or three times that Israel wasn't behind Charlie Kirk's death. Kent was blocked from investigating the assassination by some "foreign nexus"

Laos?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is beyond pathetic and embarrassing that CNN, likely via the Jerusalem censorship desk, obviously issued coded language about Joe Kent that Kaitlin Collins and other evening hosts were required to use, verbatim, to blunt the impact of his resignation letter.

Pathetic. Embarrassing. And beyond.

Turn off cable “news”. It’s all Israeli propaganda.

And that's why it's so funny seeing older ppl like those on here say how "tiktok" is brainwashing kids. Mitt Romney outright admitted that the reason they had to take control of Tiktok wasn't because of China, but because young ppl saw what was happening in Gaza and it exposed the sickening monsters of Israel who literally posted their depravity whether baby-killers in the military bragging about having raped a girl or their disgusting citizens mocking Palestinian mothers who had their babies killed.

If it were up to cable news, they'd still have you believing the bullshit israel was claiming back in 2023.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This EXPLOSIVE Tucker Kent interview was lame theater. A script written by WWE writers. Over the top Trump bootlicking. Sounds like the telegraphed scheme is to give Trump an off-ramp on this asinine war with Iran (and blame it all on bad advisors and or Bibi).

Doesn't sound telegraphed at all but very much the honest truth. Trump is surrounded and controlled by genocidal warmongering Zionists who want to escalate this war that's terrible for everyone and especially the US but Israel doesn't seem to give a damn.

You have to look at Kent through the lens of who he is. Of course he's coming from this MAGA standpoint but that doesn't mean he doesn't get frustrated with what he sees as the breakdown in intelligence and channels. He was hired to do a specific job and then felt like he was prevented from doing said job.

Where he doesn't get, and should, is that however Israel is lobbying doesn't absolve any of these people from properly doing these jobs. The US leaders should be smart and savvy enough to ask questions. But of course Trump is a moron and/or compromised (probably both) who deliberately surrounded himself with people who are either also morons or compromised (or both).

So people have to reckon with the fact that Israel doing deceptive lobbying doesn't in any way excuse the Trump administration ignoring their own sources and government and going along with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it makes sense why Netanyahu had to deny two or three times that Israel wasn't behind Charlie Kirk's death. Kent was blocked from investigating the assassination by some "foreign nexus"

Laos?

Russia of course. If Kent is claiming Israel is connected to Charlie Kirk's assassination, then much of what Candace has been saying is likely to be true.

[Anonymous]

For the FBI to make a case against Kent for releasing classified information, the information has to be true. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the FBI to make a case against Kent for releasing classified information, the information has to be true. Right?

The FBI under this administration? Haha no. They constantly bring charges without evidence for the news headlines because when the case gets dropped, the news headlines aren't as prominent and nobody notices. Smoke and mirrors show and MAGA fall for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the FBI to make a case against Kent for releasing classified information, the information has to be true. Right?

The FBI under this administration? Haha no. They constantly bring charges without evidence for the news headlines because when the case gets dropped, the news headlines aren't as prominent and nobody notices. Smoke and mirrors show and MAGA fall for it.

The FBI will bring charges against you if you say something dangerous that threatens Israel or the Deep state. Case in point:

Joe Kent on Carlson said the Kirk murder is being blocked from investigation by a foreign agency and the last time he saw Charlie, it was in the White House in passing, and Charlie said loudly, “Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” It’s so obvious who wakes CK killed now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why we cannot be watching CNN. It is sick and disgusting.

I stopped watching Jake Tapper two years ago and gave up all but Abby Phillips. She tries to ferret out the lies, but man, those people come on her show and do all kinds of cartwheels, triple backflips, and somersaults with their alternative truths aka lies. That’s getting harder and harder to watch as well. I’m sure once Ellison takes full control of CNN, I won’t be able to watch even Abby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the FBI to make a case against Kent for releasing classified information, the information has to be true. Right?

The FBI under this administration? Haha no. They constantly bring charges without evidence for the news headlines because when the case gets dropped, the news headlines aren't as prominent and nobody notices. Smoke and mirrors show and MAGA fall for it.

yes but the case will be thrown out of court

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This EXPLOSIVE Tucker Kent interview was lame theater. A script written by WWE writers. Over the top Trump bootlicking. Sounds like the telegraphed scheme is to give Trump an off-ramp on this asinine war with Iran (and blame it all on bad advisors and or Bibi).

Doesn't sound telegraphed at all but very much the honest truth. Trump is surrounded and controlled by genocidal warmongering Zionists who want to escalate this war that's terrible for everyone and especially the US but Israel doesn't seem to give a damn.

Again, if Trump surrounded himself with “genocidal warmongering Zionists” that is HIS responsibility! He choose these people. No one was forced on him.

Remember Trump is the smartest man in the room. He’s the Art of the deal guy, he’s the guy that knows everything. He’s the guy that he “alone will fix it“

Now you’re saying that he’s just a victim?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now it makes sense why Netanyahu had to deny two or three times that Israel wasn't behind Charlie Kirk's death. Kent was blocked from investigating the assassination by some "foreign nexus"

It is fascinating that the death of Charlie Kirk has turned into a right wing conspiracy. I wasn’t expecting this to happen when he died.