FACTS. But Wootton families don't deal in those. |
Nope. It closes it. If it were a move, the. Taylor wouldn’t have to move the boundaries to make it happen. He also wouldn’t need to carve up Wootton’s student body. But he’s doing both. Just admit it. Taylor is trying to fille a school that shouldn’t have been built, but he wants to use Wootton as a holding school - both of which help MCPS cover up its poor planning, with Wootton kids treated as playing cards. |
I'm really sorry you feel that way. But you're right. Every time boundaries are changed a school *essentially* closes; at least, that's how it feels. Let's have a moment of silence for Northwest now that Darnestown is moving to Poolesville. How about a moment of silence now that QO is losing Brown Station. And a moment of silence for Wootton being, as you say, "carved up," because Cold Spring won't stay in the school. Oh wait...Cold Spring asked to be moved to Churchill. So I guess we can cry for Wootton but not Cold Spring. My condolences. I'm so sorry that Taylor took community input into account and acquiesced to a feeder school of yours' demands. |
He *doesn't* need to move the boundaries to make it happen. But using the proposed boundaries makes much more sense and is much fairer than simply moving Wootton over as-is. And we are in the midst of a boundary study so it's the appropriate time to make sensible boundary changes to Wootton, and there's no good reason not to (except that some Wootton parents will gripe about it.) |
Wootton families are saying that their facility is unsafe. If its unsafe the most logical things given what is available is to move them to crown. Every school is getting redistricted, not just Wootton. All our kids are being move around. There also needs to be a holding school as there are many schools that need serious repairs or replacements. Wootton families won by getting a new school. |
Just use Crown as a holding school like Woodward, and spend a little money to repair Wootton. This makes sense if Wootton will be repaired in order to use it as a holding school that you claim is desperately needed right now. That makes even more sense because it’s less disruptive than Option H. |
Is the Crown building under construction within Wootton’s boundaries? I thought it was outside Wootton’s boundaries, which is why Taylor had to propose boundary changes in order to avoid Wootton being deemed a closure under Maryland law? If it’s within Wootton’s boundaries, what right to Gaithersburg families have to claim it was built solely for them? |
Because fixing Wootton would be very expensive and it’s not budgeted for a while out and parents are saying Wootton is unsafe. |
Define very expensive. Also, how is it that MCPS doesn’t have money to fix Wootton before transplanting its kids to Crown, but does have the money to fix it after they’re transplanted. What you’re really saying is that MCPS doesn’t want to find the money now, but will absolutely find the money when it needs Wootton as a holding school. By the way, why should we believe anything that MCPS says anymore? It built Crown and spent $300-$400 million using pre-COVID enrollment projections, conveniently right before it was going to lose the free land that Crown sits on due to a 20-year reversion clause when it was given to MCPS in 2006. MCPS used bad data to build Crown and is using bad data to close Wootton. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fDMQDtzI7hY |
Crown was planned many years ago when it was given the land. It made sense at the time. MCPS has ran off a lot of families and lower and true middle income families can no longer afford to live in the area easily. They can always reopen Wootton if they need to at a later date. |
That’s not MCPS’ fault. That’s the fault of the politicians and the economy. Crown wasn’t planned years ago. The land was set aside. MCPS used bad data to build Crown, now cries poor, and wants to transplant Wootton kids to cover up its mistake so the BOE doesn’t have to answer to angry voters. Oopsie, we have no choice now isn’t an excuse. Use Crown as a holding school until enrollment in Gaithersburg rises again. Leave Wootton alone. |
My understanding is that only minor, less costly changes are needed to make it suitable as a holding school that students and teachers are in and out of in a couple years, but that Wootton families won't tolerate only the small repairs and want much bigger more expensive renovations or replacement if they stay there. Is that not correct? |
All schools are seeing boundary changes. You are obnoxious and exhausting. There is no money for a long time to fix Wootton. You are saying its unsafe. Which is it? |
It is correct but they keep changing their story when they aren't getting their demands met. They also refuse to understand ALL schools are seeing boundary changes. |
That's correct. Just like Northwood@Woodward had to live without an auditorium for two years, but MCPS would not make a school community live with that reality forever. Holding schools can have slightly lower standards, because the kids will move on after two years. Everyone is getting a change. Wootton is getting a bigger change, but sometimes that's how it goes. |