Meghan Markle twerking video

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

You’re projecting. Megan is estranged from everyone in her life because she’s a compulsive lying narcissistic grifter and user. Isolating this putz from his friends and family was about her seizing controlling his life and trapping him so he couldn’t leave her once he wised up and realized what a great psychotic nut she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

That is not what she is doing though.

She is monetizing her family's private information.

You think dancing in the delivery room is private information?

She filmed it and posted it.

So what? Who forced you to look at any of their posts? Walk away you lunatic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

That is not what she is doing though.

She is monetizing her family's private information.

You think dancing in the delivery room is private information?

She filmed it and posted it.

So what? Who forced you to look at any of their posts? Walk away you lunatic.

Well that wouldn’t make it private would it? The discussion pp was responding to was about whether dancing in the delivery room was private.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

That is not what she is doing though.

She is monetizing her family's private information.

You think dancing in the delivery room is private information?

She filmed it and posted it.

She obviously did not film it. She was in it because she is the pregnant person. It is no different than a friend or family member taking out their phone or recorder and filming a fun event. Surely you know what this like. Yes, she posted it, but so what.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s nothing royal or dignified about these two grifters. They act like low class trash who are alums of an MTV or Bravo reality show. It’s just sad. Nobody aspires to be this woman. She lives a fake, empty and Godless life.

I literally laughed out loud. You’re a lunatic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s nothing royal or dignified about these two grifters. They act like low class trash who are alums of an MTV or Bravo reality show. It’s just sad. Nobody aspires to be this woman. She lives a fake, empty and Godless life.

Goodness. Such hatred spewing from you. Calm down. What in the world would you know about God with such a vile disposition wrapped in envy and hatred. Take that spoke out of your eye.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

You’re projecting. Megan is estranged from everyone in her life because she’s a compulsive lying narcissistic grifter and user. Isolating this putz from his friends and family was about her seizing controlling his life and trapping him so he couldn’t leave her once he wised up and realized what a great psychotic nut she is.

You are lying. She is not estranged from her mother, her niece (Samantha's daughter), or her husband. I am sure there are others, but I don't know all the people in her life and neither do you. It's interesting that you think women are such succubusses that they can trap men in 2025. You don't think much of men or women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

That is not what she is doing though.

She is monetizing her family's private information.

You think dancing in the delivery room is private information?

She filmed it and posted it.

So what? Who forced you to look at any of their posts? Walk away you lunatic.

Well that wouldn’t make it private would it? The discussion pp was responding to was about whether dancing in the delivery room was private.

Yes, I don't like PDiddy so I ignore all the coverage. See how easy that is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking? :)

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

You’re projecting. Megan is estranged from everyone in her life because she’s a compulsive lying narcissistic grifter and user. Isolating this putz from his friends and family was about her seizing controlling his life and trapping him so he couldn’t leave her once he wised up and realized what a great psychotic nut she is.

You are lying. She is not estranged from her mother, her niece (Samantha's daughter), or her husband. I am sure there are others, but I don't know all the people in her life and neither do you. It's interesting that you think women are such succubusses that they can trap men in 2025. You don't think much of men or women.

3 people out of a lifetime. NP.

Her dad, half siblings, every member of both in-law families, her cast mates from her “hit” show, her cast mates from her first show (deal or no deal; they responded in print to her whining about objectification.)

Meghan cannot maintain relationships. She married an ugly, unspeakably stupid and cruel fugmo. Neither is a prize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general.

When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not.

More people would benefit from that practice. You can cut toxic people out of your life and step out of unhealthy situations that people you love think are acceptable. DCUM would be a happier place if more people did it.

That is not what she is doing though.

She is monetizing her family's private information.

You think dancing in the delivery room is private information?

She filmed it and posted it.

So what? Who forced you to look at any of their posts? Walk away you lunatic.

Well that wouldn’t make it private would it? The discussion pp was responding to was about whether dancing in the delivery room was private.

Yes, I don't like PDiddy so I ignore all the coverage. See how easy that is.

Regardless of whether or not I like it, if it’s published it’s not private? And that is the question? Whether or not she seeks privacy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see anything wrong here. They look cute, happy and are having fun. There are some seriously miserable people who just can't wait to talk sh*t, eh?

Personally I thought it was cringe but her haters are stroking out over it so Idgaf.

The people who post here obsessively about how much they hate Meghan Markle are mentally ill. I just ignore celebrities I don't like, I'm not sure why they haven't figured out yet that they can do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Most of the people I know who are obsessed with Meghan are often really liberal women with a closet love for everything princessy who were in love with Prince Harry at some point.

The ones who hate her are from all political stripes, from far left to right, but who have the common thread of a sister in law, sister, or daughter in law who went scorched earth against the family to isolate and control the husband, OR they were a victim of a bridezilla type best friend or boss.

The people who hate her have that correlation of being wronged by a person like that. Meghan represents that woman, so it is easy to transfer that hate towards her, instead of expressing it to their own Meghan in real life.

It has nothing to do with politics or maga.

That is just a ridiculous claim. Most maga people don't care enough about her to work up a sweat, unless they fall into that category of people who have experienced real life Meghan types. But those people transcend politics. It truly is a non partisan group.

So, in other words, they're projecting onto Meghan when they know nothing about her or the situation?

The people who hate her because she reminds them of a SIL or DIL who "went scorched earth against the family" should consider WHY they are estranged from said SIL or DIL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Did those other celebrities make a big stink and excommunicate their in-laws while demanding privacy?

Actually, most people don't have Royals for in-laws. THEY have the power in the relationship, not her. And King Charles/Prince Willy cannot unite their own family and are expected to lead a nation! What a farce!! No one seems to see that irony. And BTW it's not just Harry who went astray - one doesn't have to go far to see Prince Andrew or King Edward (Queen Elizabeth's uncle), or even King Charles's scandle. This family has very long history of dysfunction and deceit. MM has nothing on them. She's merely a small drop in the bucket - she does get a lot more criticism because 1. She's not British, 2. She's not royalty, 3. She's not upper class, 4. She's half black, and 5. She's American. Wallis Simpson got some wrath because she was American - but she was still white and upper class, yet they treated her with disdain.

Meghan and Harry knew that if they deployed a charge of racism against Catherine in particular that she could never publicly defend herself. It’s repellant, and it’s what they did. They’re a vulgar couple trying to seem globally important thinkers when they’re just insta influencers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has a pathological obsession with attention. It's a dopamine rush. Since she nor her husband have literally ever had a real job, they presumably sit on their phones, iPads and laptops literally all day consuming social media and tabloid trash, thinking of ways for them to cook up attention for themselves.

In short, arrested development low class idle rich trash.

This is what I don't get about her. She had the attention of the entire world on her and she couldn't handle it. So they left the UK and cause Harry's entire family to stop speaking to him, so they could live a private life. And now she is posting 4-year-old videos of moments that should be shared between the two of them. For what? Attention. Because she doesn't want to be in the spotlight but can't stay out of it. This is why people think she's nuts.

I could never wrap my head around this either…other than they need $$$ now

They left the RF because nothing was on their terms. H & M are shortsighted and impulsive in everything they do. If only they had trusted advisors to give good advice but they burn every bridge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]

Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.

As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?

Did those other celebrities make a big stink and excommunicate their in-laws while demanding privacy?

Actually, most people don't have Royals for in-laws. THEY have the power in the relationship, not her. And King Charles/Prince Willy cannot unite their own family and are expected to lead a nation! What a farce!! No one seems to see that irony. And BTW it's not just Harry who went astray - one doesn't have to go far to see Prince Andrew or King Edward (Queen Elizabeth's uncle), or even King Charles's scandle. This family has very long history of dysfunction and deceit. MM has nothing on them. She's merely a small drop in the bucket - she does get a lot more criticism because 1. She's not British, 2. She's not royalty, 3. She's not upper class, 4. She's half black, and 5. She's American. Wallis Simpson got some wrath because she was American - but she was still white and upper class, yet they treated her with disdain.

Meghan and Harry knew that if they deployed a charge of racism against Catherine in particular that she could never publicly defend herself. It’s repellant, and it’s what they did. They’re a vulgar couple trying to seem globally important thinkers when they’re just insta influencers.

The BRF has a long history of racism. It’s wild to me that you people refuse to believe that there would be racism against the first Black woman to marry into the BRF.

I mean, I get that you have that irrational obsession with and hate for Meghan, but it’s still an astounding level of ignorance.