Meghan Markle twerking video

Anonymous
Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]


Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.


As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?


Did those other celebrities make a big stink and excommunicate their in-laws while demanding privacy?


Actually, most people don't have Royals for in-laws. THEY have the power in the relationship, not her. And King Charles/Prince Willy cannot unite their own family and are expected to lead a nation! What a farce!! No one seems to see that irony. And BTW it's not just Harry who went astray - one doesn't have to go far to see Prince Andrew or King Edward (Queen Elizabeth's uncle), or even King Charles's scandle. This family has very long history of dysfunction and deceit. MM has nothing on them. She's merely a small drop in the bucket - she does get a lot more criticism because 1. She's not British, 2. She's not royalty, 3. She's not upper class, 4. She's half black, and 5. She's American. Wallis Simpson got some wrath because she was American - but she was still white and upper class, yet they treated her with disdain.


Meghan and Harry knew that if they deployed a charge of racism against Catherine in particular that she could never publicly defend herself. It’s repellant, and it’s what they did. They’re a vulgar couple trying to seem globally important thinkers when they’re just insta influencers.


The BRF has a long history of racism. It’s wild to me that you people refuse to believe that there would be racism against the first Black woman to marry into the BRF.

I mean, I get that you have that irrational obsession with and hate for Meghan, but it’s still an astounding level of ignorance.



You’re just not very smart, and can’t craft a responsive post. Not a surprise.

This grimy couple specifically had a journalist make an accusation in a book that Catherine was racist - the Endgame fiasco. This has nothing to do with the middle passage or Wilberforce or some crusty musty broad wearing a dated brooch. Meghan and Harry are not a fun couple who Took A Stand Against Racism. They were angry to be less important in a system based on primogeniture and lashed out in ways that have no apparent basis until you factor in their envy.

Hope it was worth it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The parallelism between MAGA and Markle-haters is striking.

I am not even talking about her haters being conservative (because I don’t think that’s a factor for the most part), but it’s the cult-like irrationality. It’s the hypocrisy and blind loyalty to hating her. It’s the rabid behavior.

If you’re reading this as a Markle hater, I ask that you take two minutes to self reflect.

[NP]


Sorry I agree with the thread above. MM unites republicans and democrats in their dislike.

Hate is a strong word. She triggers me, because I can see my sister-in-law doing so many things from blaming to being fake sweet to spreading false stories.

The dance video itself is pretty inoffensive. However, if my sister-in-law did it, it would be for attention-getting purposes, and I would mute it.


As opposed to other celebrities, who do not exhibit attention-seeking?


Did those other celebrities make a big stink and excommunicate their in-laws while demanding privacy?


Actually, most people don't have Royals for in-laws. THEY have the power in the relationship, not her. And King Charles/Prince Willy cannot unite their own family and are expected to lead a nation! What a farce!! No one seems to see that irony. And BTW it's not just Harry who went astray - one doesn't have to go far to see Prince Andrew or King Edward (Queen Elizabeth's uncle), or even King Charles's scandle. This family has very long history of dysfunction and deceit. MM has nothing on them. She's merely a small drop in the bucket - she does get a lot more criticism because 1. She's not British, 2. She's not royalty, 3. She's not upper class, 4. She's half black, and 5. She's American. Wallis Simpson got some wrath because she was American - but she was still white and upper class, yet they treated her with disdain.


Meghan and Harry knew that if they deployed a charge of racism against Catherine in particular that she could never publicly defend herself. It’s repellant, and it’s what they did. They’re a vulgar couple trying to seem globally important thinkers when they’re just insta influencers.


The BRF has a long history of racism. It’s wild to me that you people refuse to believe that there would be racism against the first Black woman to marry into the BRF.

I mean, I get that you have that irrational obsession with and hate for Meghan, but it’s still an astounding level of ignorance.



You’re just not very smart, and can’t craft a responsive post. Not a surprise.

This grimy couple specifically had a journalist make an accusation in a book that Catherine was racist - the Endgame fiasco. This has nothing to do with the middle passage or Wilberforce or some crusty musty broad wearing a dated brooch. Meghan and Harry are not a fun couple who Took A Stand Against Racism. They were angry to be less important in a system based on primogeniture and lashed out in ways that have no apparent basis until you factor in their envy.

Hope it was worth it.


Look at you simping for a racist institution.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.


TBH, Meghan’s haters will insure that she stays relevant.

If her ultimate plan was to become more popular, it was a damn smart plan because you all can’t give up Meghan to save your own lives.

Maybe y’all should get a bunch of ill-fitting baseball caps……….
Anonymous
Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)
Anonymous
^ Meghan’s haters will ensure
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


You’re either a troll, had your kids by c-section, are a man, or are misremembering. The “lumps” are the monitors they put on you to keep track of the baby’s heartbeat.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


Meghan’s haters aren’t sending their best, huh? 🤭🤭
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


You’re either a troll, had your kids by c-section, are a man, or are misremembering. The “lumps” are the monitors they put on you to keep track of the baby’s heartbeat.


1st was 14 years ago.
Yes. 2nd and 3rd CS

I thank you for your explanation. That’s all I needed. Not a troll.
Anonymous
You are unhinged if you think any question is a hater.
Anonymous
I told you I just joined the conversation, hadn’t really cared to join it because all sides are so insane.

It’s insane that a question has you so ready to pounce. Get a life. This is why no one can talk about Meghan, loving her, questioning her. All sides are polarized and ready to jump on you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)


I just don’t get the dancing around at that stage of pregnancy and awaiting an induction or being in labor. I had an induction and was in no mood for that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok I finally watched it. Seeing this thread for days and not wanting to join in.

I do not think the bump looks genuine. I’m so sorry to say. 3x I’ve had kids. It was a smooth bump. I was HUGE, but the bump was tight and smooth.

What is going on with the lumpy misshapen bump?

Sorry. Im not even a hater. I also respect them if they used a surrogate. (I just don’t think brf allows it and that’s why they are silent)

The queen met Archie a few days after Meghan got home from the hospital. Why would she participate in a grift like that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Who are her genuine fans? Unmarried low class with delusions of grandeur?

Without “haters” she’d be completely irrelevant. She’s fun to mock, that’s about it.

You guys keep her incredibly relevant. There were hundreds of pages about her show on here and oh look, Netflix just ordered a third season.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: