Why does everyone think Kamala was such a bad candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

She has to take the bar exam 3 times and gained admission to law school under affirmative action.

You have no idea what her stats were to get into law school. You sound racist. The CA bar is notoriously difficult btw.

DP. What's racist about this.

I for one would like something else other than another lawyer.

Seriously, the executive branch RUNS things. They're like a CEO.

Meanwhile, the legislative branch creates laws. Why have that again in the executive branch?

Too many lawyers. All they care about is legislation, and they think differently than someone who has to run things.

A person with a background in business and commerce has a much wider outlook than a lawyer and they strategize differently.

Up until the late 1800s, most of our legislators were in business, commerce, the trades and farming? Whole different mindset.

Look at how Biden strategizes against other competing nations in a global economy vs. how Trump does it. I'm more comfortable with Trump and his team for that.

I hope you don't think I'm racist for saying that, do you?

[Anonymous]

Everyone gets into law school that wants to, so it’s no great measure of intelligence to get into one, or even graduate b/c they don’t flunk anyone out. And plenty of people pass the California bar, so that’s no great feat either.

I agree w/PP a while back. She had done nothing notable her entire career, in any position.

She did basically call Joe Biden a racist during that one debate years ago, which I thought was funny. That is probably what she will be known for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone gets into law school that wants to, so it’s no great measure of intelligence to get into one, or even graduate b/c they don’t flunk anyone out. And plenty of people pass the California bar, so that’s no great feat either.

I agree w/PP a while back. She had done nothing notable her entire career, in any position.

She did basically call Joe Biden a racist during that one debate years ago, which I thought was funny. That is probably what she will be known for.

This is the thing, she has done well to get herself into high positions but once there she has not done anything notable. In fact, the most notable things that she has done is sass people. She sassed Biden in a debate. She sassed Trump in a debate. She apparently was good at sassing witnesses during Senate hearings.

That is not enough for me. I want to know what initiatives did she implement as VP. What legislation did she sponsor and pass as Senator? What actions did she take to meaningfully protect the citizens of California from harm as AG?

I have researched her somewhat and sadly the only real initiative that or contribution that I can identify that was hers alone was to prosecute parents for their truant children when she was SF DA that she expanded into a statewide program when she was CA AG.
https://x.com/WalkerBragman/status/1089831581030797312
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/10/17/924766186/the-story-behind-kamala-harriss-truancy-program
https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/kamala-harris-criminalized-and-prosecuted-parents

That is basically her entire career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has always come across as intelligent, articulate and very well-informed on the issues.
She put Trump to shame during the debate.
I don’t even think her answer on The View that she couldn’t really think of anything she would do differently from Biden was particularly damning. She is his Vice-President, what the heck could she really have said?

And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump, but I would have done so no matter who was on the Democratic ticket.

She wasn't but our country is racist and misogynistic. I actually told a friend they needed to put in a white male otherwise democrats will lose. It's so sad but so true. They literally voted for a rapist over her.

Rapists get more respect from our adversaries and many friendly governments than someone chirping about freedom and joy. Even the wife of the man she served as Vice President threw shade at Harris’s Joy campaign. Harris positioned herself as the Maria Kondo of world leaders. Well organized underwear drawers do not stop bombs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

She has to take the bar exam 3 times and gained admission to law school under affirmative action.

You have no idea what her stats were to get into law school. You sound racist. The CA bar is notoriously difficult btw.

DP. What's racist about this.

I for one would like something else other than another lawyer.

Seriously, the executive branch RUNS things. They're like a CEO.

Meanwhile, the legislative branch creates laws. Why have that again in the executive branch?

Too many lawyers. All they care about is legislation, and they think differently than someone who has to run things.

A person with a background in business and commerce has a much wider outlook than a lawyer and they strategize differently.

Up until the late 1800s, most of our legislators were in business, commerce, the trades and farming? Whole different mindset.

Look at how Biden strategizes against other competing nations in a global economy vs. how Trump does it. I'm more comfortable with Trump and his team for that.

I hope you don't think I'm racist for saying that, do you?

Dp- I’ll take the team that gave us the soft landing over the felon that caused the crash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

She has to take the bar exam 3 times and gained admission to law school under affirmative action.

You have no idea what her stats were to get into law school. You sound racist. The CA bar is notoriously difficult btw.

So? Wouldn't it be nice if a candidate for the President of the United States is one of the 40% who pass it on the first try?

What law school did donnie go to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has always come across as intelligent, articulate and very well-informed on the issues.
She put Trump to shame during the debate.
I don’t even think her answer on The View that she couldn’t really think of anything she would do differently from Biden was particularly damning. She is his Vice-President, what the heck could she really have said?

And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump, but I would have done so no matter who was on the Democratic ticket.

She wasn't but our country is racist and misogynistic. I actually told a friend they needed to put in a white male otherwise democrats will lose. It's so sad but so true. They literally voted for a rapist over her.

Rapists get more respect from our adversaries and many friendly governments than someone chirping about freedom and joy. Even the wife of the man she served as Vice President threw shade at Harris’s Joy campaign. Harris positioned herself as the Maria Kondo of world leaders. Well organized underwear drawers do not stop bombs

Yup. The country (and world) is misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

She has to take the bar exam 3 times and gained admission to law school under affirmative action.

You have no idea what her stats were to get into law school. You sound racist. The CA bar is notoriously difficult btw.

DP. What's racist about this.

I for one would like something else other than another lawyer.

Seriously, the executive branch RUNS things. They're like a CEO.

Meanwhile, the legislative branch creates laws. Why have that again in the executive branch?

Too many lawyers. All they care about is legislation, and they think differently than someone who has to run things.

A person with a background in business and commerce has a much wider outlook than a lawyer and they strategize differently.

Up until the late 1800s, most of our legislators were in business, commerce, the trades and farming? Whole different mindset.

Look at how Biden strategizes against other competing nations in a global economy vs. how Trump does it. I'm more comfortable with Trump and his team for that.

I hope you don't think I'm racist for saying that, do you?

Dp- I’ll take the team that gave us the soft landing over the felon that caused the crash.

As would any rational, well-informed person who isn’t a raging a-hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone gets into law school that wants to, so it’s no great measure of intelligence to get into one, or even graduate b/c they don’t flunk anyone out. And plenty of people pass the California bar, so that’s no great feat either.

I agree w/PP a while back. She had done nothing notable her entire career, in any position.

She did basically call Joe Biden a racist during that one debate years ago, which I thought was funny. That is probably what she will be known for.

This is the thing, she has done well to get herself into high positions but once there she has not done anything notable. In fact, the most notable things that she has done is sass people. She sassed Biden in a debate. She sassed Trump in a debate. She apparently was good at sassing witnesses during Senate hearings.

That is not enough for me. I want to know what initiatives did she implement as VP. What legislation did she sponsor and pass as Senator? What actions did she take to meaningfully protect the citizens of California from harm as AG?

I have researched her somewhat and sadly the only real initiative that or contribution that I can identify that was hers alone was to prosecute parents for their truant children when she was SF DA that she expanded into a statewide program when she was CA AG.
https://x.com/WalkerBragman/status/1089831581030797312
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/10/17/924766186/the-story-behind-kamala-harriss-truancy-program
https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/kamala-harris-criminalized-and-prosecuted-parents

That is basically her entire career.

Exactly. Kamala has done nothing responsible. Nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has always come across as intelligent, articulate and very well-informed on the issues.
She put Trump to shame during the debate.
I don’t even think her answer on The View that she couldn’t really think of anything she would do differently from Biden was particularly damning. She is his Vice-President, what the heck could she really have said?

And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump, but I would have done so no matter who was on the Democratic ticket.

She wasn't but our country is racist and misogynistic. I actually told a friend they needed to put in a white male otherwise democrats will lose. It's so sad but so true. They literally voted for a rapist over her.

Rapists get more respect from our adversaries and many friendly governments than someone chirping about freedom and joy. Even the wife of the man she served as Vice President threw shade at Harris’s Joy campaign. Harris positioned herself as the Maria Kondo of world leaders. Well organized underwear drawers do not stop bombs

Yup. The country (and world) is misogynistic.

Womyns Studies are going the way of DEIsm. Time for you to drop your benighted belief that misogyny is the reason that there had never been a US female president. If a woman like those who headed many countries were nominated, she would win.

[Anonymous]

Because Kamala runs on entitlement. What does she think she is saying in these most recent speeches?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has always come across as intelligent, articulate and very well-informed on the issues.
She put Trump to shame during the debate.
I don’t even think her answer on The View that she couldn’t really think of anything she would do differently from Biden was particularly damning. She is his Vice-President, what the heck could she really have said?

And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump, but I would have done so no matter who was on the Democratic ticket.

She wasn't but our country is racist and misogynistic. I actually told a friend they needed to put in a white male otherwise democrats will lose. It's so sad but so true. They literally voted for a rapist over her.

Rapists get more respect from our adversaries and many friendly governments than someone chirping about freedom and joy. Even the wife of the man she served as Vice President threw shade at Harris’s Joy campaign. Harris positioned herself as the Maria Kondo of world leaders. Well organized underwear drawers do not stop bombs

Yup. The country (and world) is misogynistic.

Womyns Studies are going the way of DEIsm. Time for you to drop your benighted belief that misogyny is the reason that there had never been a US female president. If a woman like those who headed many countries were nominated, she would win.

Thanks for proving my point, a$$wipe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

She has to take the bar exam 3 times and gained admission to law school under affirmative action.

You have no idea what her stats were to get into law school. You sound racist. The CA bar is notoriously difficult btw.

DP
Oh, we have some idea.
The median LSAT score for the school is roughly at the 80th percentile.
It is reputationally at about the same tier (tier 3 or 4 (~80 out of 180) today as it was in 1986 which normally requires a much lower LSAT score but it's location made it more selective.
She got in through an affirmative action program called the "legal action opportunity program" so we can surmise her Academic credentials (particularly her LSAT scores were lower than normal).

But she was able to get Willy Brown to mentor her and help her start her political career.
Since then she has won a grand total of zero contested elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone gets into law school that wants to, so it’s no great measure of intelligence to get into one, or even graduate b/c they don’t flunk anyone out. And plenty of people pass the California bar, so that’s no great feat either.

I agree w/PP a while back. She had done nothing notable her entire career, in any position.

She did basically call Joe Biden a racist during that one debate years ago, which I thought was funny. That is probably what she will be known for.

This is the thing, she has done well to get herself into high positions but once there she has not done anything notable. In fact, the most notable things that she has done is sass people. She sassed Biden in a debate. She sassed Trump in a debate. She apparently was good at sassing witnesses during Senate hearings.

That is not enough for me. I want to know what initiatives did she implement as VP. What legislation did she sponsor and pass as Senator? What actions did she take to meaningfully protect the citizens of California from harm as AG?

I have researched her somewhat and sadly the only real initiative that or contribution that I can identify that was hers alone was to prosecute parents for their truant children when she was SF DA that she expanded into a statewide program when she was CA AG.
https://x.com/WalkerBragman/status/1089831581030797312
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/10/17/924766186/the-story-behind-kamala-harriss-truancy-program
https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/kamala-harris-criminalized-and-prosecuted-parents

That is basically her entire career.

She did go out with willy brown... so she has that going for her.

[Anonymous]

lol at all these posters who think being an AG or a senator is no big accomplishment.