Gisele Bundchen is pregnant with baby #3!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's weird is that this was probably a fling and now she has an oopsie with this guy. She will end up paying him millions when they break up.

That’s embarrassing. This whole thing seems embarrassing for her.

How is it embarrassing for her? Because if the patriarchy. When a man does it it’s ok and celebrated, but when a woman does it it’s bad? Give me a break.

It's embarassing for a man too. This isn't about him vs her as much as people keep pushing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's weird is that this was probably a fling and now she has an oopsie with this guy. She will end up paying him millions when they break up.

That’s embarrassing. This whole thing seems embarrassing for her.

How is it embarrassing for her? Because if the patriarchy. When a man does it it’s ok and celebrated, but when a woman does it it’s bad? Give me a break.

Because she will be parenting with this fool for the next 18 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she is a licensed helicpter pilot.

And has a net worth that is probably more than Tom Brady's....all from her career and working.

Not sure why people make successful women out to be sad sacks to support their bias

You know why. Misogyny. Men have kids in their 40s all the time.

And those kids often resent dad and his starting a 2nd new family to replace the first one. Kids aren’t thrilled for their parents in these situations.

This. Starting a second family is bad for the first set of kids.

It's not their first rodeo. They have the experience with their older brother. They will get over it

You're as blase about the kids' mental states as their parents.

+1

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel sorry for the new baby. Can you imagine growing up with half siblings who get to have Tom Brady for a Dad but you only have…your half siblings’ karate instructor (“the help) for a Dad? That your mom cheated with? Sucks for that kid.

I am sure Gisele will will talk major crap about Brady. They will be fine.

Sorry, but having a major football star for a Dad vs someone your mother hired to instruct her kids…aka “the help.” No comparison. That poor kid is going to have a complex.

Yes.

Unless she overcompensates and this baby becomes her favorite.

Regardless, it’s a weird family dynamic for the baby…who will be left behind when the others visit Tom Brady.

I feel the same way about Kourtney Kardashian’s baby with the tatted drummer vs the 3 she had with Scott.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she is a licensed helicpter pilot.

And has a net worth that is probably more than Tom Brady's....all from her career and working.

Not sure why people make successful women out to be sad sacks to support their bias

You know why. Misogyny. Men have kids in their 40s all the time.

And those kids often resent dad and his starting a 2nd new family to replace the first one. Kids aren’t thrilled for their parents in these situations.

This. Starting a second family is bad for the first set of kids.

It's not their first rodeo. They have the experience with their older brother. They will get over it

You're as blase about the kids' mental states as their parents.

So no parent should ever have other kids because of the affect it will have on the first set?

Yes, now you’re catching on.

I'm the 2nd set and so much better than the first. I'm my dad's favorite too.

Wow, so much to unpack here. Your post unintentionally illustrates exactly why a parent having a second set of kids is usually so harmful to the first set.

Second wives who go after men with children are frequently jealous and competitive. They inevitably resent the first wife and set of kids. Then they have their own kids and raise them to ice out the first set.

The type of man who starts the second family this is generally extremely selfish and is a terrible father to his first set of kids. Then he and the second wife blame the first kids for not having a great relationship with their dad. Now they have their excuse lined up to detach them from their dad.

Seeing your post about how you're your dad's favorite perfectly demonstrates this dynamic. It's sad that you're raised to compete with your half siblings rather than love and support them.

Your parents never should have married and had kids since they couldn't find a way to do so without causing great harm to your dad's existing children. But of course you'll never understand this.

[Anonymous]

I mostly just don’t get wanting to restart your clock and go all the back to the baby years. They’re wretched. I see toddler parents out now and think how happy I am that’s not my life anymore. Putting my body through that when I look great now - no way. Rebounding from pregnancy at 44 is not going to be a walk in the park. Idk, seems like she had it made, now she’s pregnant, staring down babybood with a kid who won’t have the same sibling bond with her older 2 due to the age difference, and tied to another guy for life. Doesn’t seem worth it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mostly just don’t get wanting to restart your clock and go all the back to the baby years. They’re wretched. I see toddler parents out now and think how happy I am that’s not my life anymore. Putting my body through that when I look great now - no way. Rebounding from pregnancy at 44 is not going to be a walk in the park. Idk, seems like she had it made, now she’s pregnant, staring down babybood with a kid who won’t have the same sibling bond with her older 2 due to the age difference, and tied to another guy for life. Doesn’t seem worth it.

She is worth 400 million dollars. She has a chef, private plane and she will have nannies. She is not an average mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mostly just don’t get wanting to restart your clock and go all the back to the baby years. They’re wretched. I see toddler parents out now and think how happy I am that’s not my life anymore. Putting my body through that when I look great now - no way. Rebounding from pregnancy at 44 is not going to be a walk in the park. Idk, seems like she had it made, now she’s pregnant, staring down babybood with a kid who won’t have the same sibling bond with her older 2 due to the age difference, and tied to another guy for life. Doesn’t seem worth it.

She is worth 400 million dollars. She has a chef, private plane and she will have nannies. She is not an average mother.

Unless she’s totally detached from her kid and pays them no mind, it’s still not easy. Her older kids will have different interests so vacations get harder, babies and toddlers are disruptive and unpredictable, the house probably runs like a machine now and no matter how much money you have you don’t get to avoid all of the changes that will come. Unless she’s cruel and completely ignores the baby, but supposedly she she’s a wonderful mom. That means she has to be pretty hands on. Otherwise she’s not so great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's weird is that this was probably a fling and now she has an oopsie with this guy. She will end up paying him millions when they break up.

That’s embarrassing. This whole thing seems embarrassing for her.

How is it embarrassing for her? Because if the patriarchy. When a man does it it’s ok and celebrated, but when a woman does it it’s bad? Give me a break.

Because she will be parenting with this fool for the next 18 years.

She loves him and wants to expand her family with him. Thats not foolish embarrassing. Thats lovely for her

[Anonymous]

Obviously its none of my business but as she is a celebrity who posts personal information for public consumption, this is questionable on many levels.

One, she is a parent whose existing children are going through broken family trauma. They don't need this or her being distracted with a man and a baby.

Second, there is a grace period between divorce and rebound even with ongoing affair for mental health.

Third, she is risking baby's health and future with a geriatric pregnancy.

However, fortunately she is a model, not a role model.

That being said, men do these things often and with less judgement but that doesn't make it right.

[Anonymous]

I'm surprised she didn't use a surrogate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mostly just don’t get wanting to restart your clock and go all the back to the baby years. They’re wretched. I see toddler parents out now and think how happy I am that’s not my life anymore. Putting my body through that when I look great now - no way. Rebounding from pregnancy at 44 is not going to be a walk in the park. Idk, seems like she had it made, now she’s pregnant, staring down babybood with a kid who won’t have the same sibling bond with her older 2 due to the age difference, and tied to another guy for life. Doesn’t seem worth it.

She is worth 400 million dollars. She has a chef, private plane and she will have nannies. She is not an average mother.

In addition to this, some people enjoy having young kids. I’m not advocating for having kids in your mid forties, but I personally enjoy young kids (not newborns, but toddlers+) and if I had the resources Gisele has, including chefs, endless cleaning and as much childcare support as I needed, it would be that much more enjoyable. Different strokes for different folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's weird is that this was probably a fling and now she has an oopsie with this guy. She will end up paying him millions when they break up.

That’s embarrassing. This whole thing seems embarrassing for her.

How is it embarrassing for her? Because if the patriarchy. When a man does it it’s ok and celebrated, but when a woman does it it’s bad? Give me a break.

Because she will be parenting with this fool for the next 18 years.

This is I think is wrong. This dude will be tossed aside when she is done with him. He of course has rights but will get crushed because she has the money and the power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised she didn't use a surrogate.

Why would she do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's weird is that this was probably a fling and now she has an oopsie with this guy. She will end up paying him millions when they break up.

That’s embarrassing. This whole thing seems embarrassing for her.

How is it embarrassing for her? Because if the patriarchy. When a man does it it’s ok and celebrated, but when a woman does it it’s bad? Give me a break.

Because she will be parenting with this fool for the next 18 years.

She loves him and wants to expand her family with him. Thats not foolish embarrassing. Thats lovely for her

Where is it said anywhere that she loves him? I think you are overreading into this.