Gisele Bundchen is pregnant with baby #3!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gisele is happy. Brady is happy. They're still co-parenting their kids. What's the issue here?

There’s no issue. Just a bunch of of misogynistic , ageist, classist, weirdos currently wallowing in rage over the birth of a child.

There is no issue for selfish individuals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gisele is happy. Brady is happy. They're still co-parenting their kids. What's the issue here?

It's not an issue for those who think affairs are fine and/or multiple spouses and affair partners are no big deal for kids' emotional development.

Don’t forget slagging the help!

"The help" You have deep issues. I hope you forgive your ex get some help

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gisele is happy. Brady is happy. They're still co-parenting their kids. What's the issue here?

There’s no issue. Just a bunch of of misogynistic , ageist, classist, weirdos currently wallowing in rage over the birth of a child.

Sweetie, you can't cyber-bully science or father time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And another one. Tilda Swinton is 64. Her partner 46. They have been together for decades. A mere 9 year gap is nothing.

Joan Collins is 31 years older than her husband of over 20 years. Tina Turner was 16 years older than her husband and they were together for almost 3 decades until her death.

Yes!! Keep it coming! Their misogyny and outdated views have no place here

Kris Jenner and Corey Gamble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gisele is happy. Brady is happy. They're still co-parenting their kids. What's the issue here?

There’s no issue. Just a bunch of of misogynistic , ageist, classist, weirdos currently wallowing in rage over the birth of a child.

Sweetie, you can't cyber-bully science or father time.

I’m not your sweetie. And the science is not so discouraging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gisele is happy. Brady is happy. They're still co-parenting their kids. What's the issue here?

There’s no issue. Just a bunch of of misogynistic , ageist, classist, weirdos currently wallowing in rage over the birth of a child.

Sweetie, you can't cyber-bully science or father time.

I’m not your sweetie. And the science is not so discouraging.

Having children approximately 3 decades after puberty has consequences, and it's risky to think otherwise. Please visit some classes with children who have special needs (and I don't mean those with ADHD).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gisele is happy. Brady is happy. They're still co-parenting their kids. What's the issue here?

It's not an issue for those who think affairs are fine and/or multiple spouses and affair partners are no big deal for kids' emotional development.

Don’t forget slagging the help!

+100

[Anonymous]

Brady hasn't said he's happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brady hasn't said he's happy.

He is busy. If you look at the Super Bowl show on Fox it looks like he spent all week getting dermabrasion, botox and fillers. He looks like a freak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brady hasn't said he's happy.

And neither have the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brady hasn't said he's happy.

He is busy. If you look at the Super Bowl show on Fox it looks like he spent all week getting dermabrasion, botox and fillers. He looks like a freak.

He is the cliche of a rich divorced dad, who’s only ever dated models.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how people wish ill on this woman and baby. Like you’re disappointing that she had a healthy baby.

Are you her doctor? You don’t know if the baby is healthy. Autism for example isn’t immediate evident.

What is wrong with you that you're wishing for a ill baby??? Because of Brady? Because you were the jealous first wife?

Are you cognitively impaired? PP stated a fact - autism isn’t evident at birth. That’s not wishing the baby ill will.

"How does you know it's healthy" they aren't innocent questions. Hope off

We have no idea of any details. It’s true, autism wouldn’t show until later. We literally have no idea if it’s true the baby is healthy. That’s not wishing ill will on the baby - that’s just basic facts. Grow up!

Why are you thinking negatively negatively about the baby at all? Stop acting dumb like we don't know the true intentions. You don't like Gisele, want her bf to leave her and there something to be wrong with the baby. Sicko

This is not wishing anything, it is trusting the science. She is 44 years old. The science says this was a hyper-high risk "advanced geriatric pregnancy." The risks for health defects, including autism, accelerate rapidly in your 40s.

New Poster. Had my twins (SMC) at 44. No health issues.

Well there is mental defect in the twins’ mom - she doesn’t know what an anecdote is.

The aging North Arlington mom I know with young adult twins (born when she was ~44) is definitely mentally deficient. Plus her kids were completely out of control for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brady hasn't said he's happy.

He is busy. If you look at the Super Bowl show on Fox it looks like he spent all week getting dermabrasion, botox and fillers. He looks like a freak.

Better than having a bastard baby at 44 with the help.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how people wish ill on this woman and baby. Like you’re disappointing that she had a healthy baby.

Are you her doctor? You don’t know if the baby is healthy. Autism for example isn’t immediate evident.

What is wrong with you that you're wishing for a ill baby??? Because of Brady? Because you were the jealous first wife?

Are you cognitively impaired? PP stated a fact - autism isn’t evident at birth. That’s not wishing the baby ill will.

"How does you know it's healthy" they aren't innocent questions. Hope off

We have no idea of any details. It’s true, autism wouldn’t show until later. We literally have no idea if it’s true the baby is healthy. That’s not wishing ill will on the baby - that’s just basic facts. Grow up!

Why are you thinking negatively negatively about the baby at all? Stop acting dumb like we don't know the true intentions. You don't like Gisele, want her bf to leave her and there something to be wrong with the baby. Sicko

This is not wishing anything, it is trusting the science. She is 44 years old. The science says this was a hyper-high risk "advanced geriatric pregnancy." The risks for health defects, including autism, accelerate rapidly in your 40s.

New Poster. Had my twins (SMC) at 44. No health issues.

Well there is mental defect in the twins’ mom - she doesn’t know what an anecdote is.

The aging North Arlington mom I know with young adult twins (born when she was ~44) is definitely mentally deficient. Plus her kids were completely out of control for years.

She was probably too tired to deal with them once she hit 45.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s really disturbing how people wish ill on this woman and baby. Like you’re disappointing that she had a healthy baby.

Are you her doctor? You don’t know if the baby is healthy. Autism for example isn’t immediate evident.

What is wrong with you that you're wishing for a ill baby??? Because of Brady? Because you were the jealous first wife?

Are you cognitively impaired? PP stated a fact - autism isn’t evident at birth. That’s not wishing the baby ill will.

"How does you know it's healthy" they aren't innocent questions. Hope off

We have no idea of any details. It’s true, autism wouldn’t show until later. We literally have no idea if it’s true the baby is healthy. That’s not wishing ill will on the baby - that’s just basic facts. Grow up!

Why are you thinking negatively negatively about the baby at all? Stop acting dumb like we don't know the true intentions. You don't like Gisele, want her bf to leave her and there something to be wrong with the baby. Sicko

This is not wishing anything, it is trusting the science. She is 44 years old. The science says this was a hyper-high risk "advanced geriatric pregnancy." The risks for health defects, including autism, accelerate rapidly in your 40s.

New Poster. Had my twins (SMC) at 44. No health issues.

Well there is mental defect in the twins’ mom - she doesn’t know what an anecdote is.

The aging North Arlington mom I know with young adult twins (born when she was ~44) is definitely mentally deficient. Plus her kids were completely out of control for years.

See also Jay-Z and Beyoncé’s twins. They never show the boy twin, meanwhile the girl twin is at the Super Bowl right now with daddy.