Gisele Bundchen is pregnant with baby #3!

[Anonymous]

Wow. Did not see that coming. She’s 44 and her boyfriend, the martial arts instructor that she was originally just “friends with” is 35.

[Anonymous]

Good for her. What a gift to conceive naturally at 44!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. What a gift to conceive naturally at 44!

Sure, if you want an 18 year old at 62.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. What a gift to conceive naturally at 44!

You have no idea how the kid was conceived.

[Anonymous]

No matter how pretty and rich you are, having a baby naturally at age 44 comes with more risks. One of my kids has special needs and I was not of advanced age at birth. I encounter many moms in the waiting rooms who had their kids in their 40s. Yes, you can have a healthy child and if she has a child with SN she can afford all the interventions, but I am not in the "good for her" camp. There are so many risks and it's not aspirational.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No matter how pretty and rich you are, having a baby naturally at age 44 comes with more risks. One of my kids has special needs and I was not of advanced age at birth. I encounter many moms in the waiting rooms who had their kids in their 40s. Yes, you can have a healthy child and if she has a child with SN she can afford all the interventions, but I am not in the "good for her" camp. There are so many risks and it's not aspirational.

+1

[Anonymous]

ooo, just like my boyfriend. I was 43 and he 34. We have a knockout son.

[Anonymous]

I'm 65 and my twins are in college. Yessss it is great.

[Anonymous]

Not surprised they're in it for the long haul. He seems like a good for fit for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. What a gift to conceive naturally at 44!

Sure, if you want an 18 year old at 62.

And I bet she’ll look better at 62 than you do at 40

[Anonymous]

I had a kid in my 40s, as did nearly all my mom friends. None off us has a kid with SN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No matter how pretty and rich you are, having a baby naturally at age 44 comes with more risks. One of my kids has special needs and I was not of advanced age at birth. I encounter many moms in the waiting rooms who had their kids in their 40s. Yes, you can have a healthy child and if she has a child with SN she can afford all the interventions, but I am not in the "good for her" camp. There are so many risks and it's not aspirational.

The reality of life is that regardless of special needs her child may have, they will still have a better quality of life than any of our kids in the DMV. That kind of money pays for all the therapies, and opens any door.

[Anonymous]

If I had her money, I'd be up for having a baby at 44 if I had a 36-year-old childless boyfriend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. What a gift to conceive naturally at 44!

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had a kid in my 40s, as did nearly all my mom friends. None off us has a kid with SN.

Several of my friends have had a child in their 40s and nearly all the kids had issues; birth complications, crazy allergies, learning disabilities, health defects, if not special needs.