2012G ECNL Teams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Arlington didn't just lose. They got clowned by SYC when they played a couple of months ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

They all did Einstein. Saying SYC added players from outside is the same as saying Arlington, VDA or Union added outside players. Everyone does. That statement isn't nearly as powerful as you think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

They all did Einstein. Saying SYC added players from outside is the same as saying Arlington, VDA or Union added outside players. Everyone does. That statement isn't nearly as powerful as you think.

I didn’t say it was negative, Einstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

They all did Einstein. Saying SYC added players from outside is the same as saying Arlington, VDA or Union added outside players. Everyone does. That statement isn't nearly as powerful as you think.

I didn’t say it was negative, Einstein.

Meh. Then your writing style needs work. You, sir or madam are no Salinger. The way you wrote it, it came across as negative. That's ok. I'm sure you probably tried.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

2011G SYC will land a few outsiders this coming year due to coach and players seeking more playing time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

2011G SYC will land a few outsiders this coming year due to coach and players seeking more playing time.

Nobody is going to SYC 2011 to play for that clown

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

2011G SYC will land a few outsiders this coming year due to coach and players seeking more playing time.

Who cares about 2011 SYC, go to a 2011 GA thread for that nonsense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok help me out here. So whats up with SYC? Are they really good? Really dirty? Coaches aholes? Parents aholes?

1st year for SYC in GA, which means the talented kids did not leave to go join ECNL clubs. They were able to keep their talented kids in house for the 1st year and the 2012 teams and younger (teams they have grown/ developed in club are stronger than the 2011 teams and up as the better kids left previously.) -Essentially yes, they are really good and its a bad look for ECNL clubs to lose to a GA club.

Syc added players from outside clubs too for 2012. The 2011 team is imported with the new coach they hired.

2011G SYC will land a few outsiders this coming year due to coach and players seeking more playing time.

Nobody is going to SYC 2011 to play for that clown

A little harsh! Team seems to be doing well.

[Anonymous]

2011 Rankings per the Ranking App:

Team National Ranking
Arlington 3
Richmond 20
Fairfax 75
NVA 77
Beach 79
VDA 101
SYC 168
Revolution 216

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2011 Rankings per the Ranking App:

Team National Ranking
Arlington 3
Richmond 20
Fairfax 75
NVA 77
Beach 79
VDA 101
SYC 168
Revolution 216

Again no one cares, this is a 2012 thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2011 Rankings per the Ranking App:

Team National Ranking
Arlington 3
Richmond 20
Fairfax 75
NVA 77
Beach 79
VDA 101
SYC 168
Revolution 216

Rankings are lower for syc and rev bc those teams didn’t exist until this year. Rankings includes results for past two years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2011 Rankings per the Ranking App:

Team National Ranking
Arlington 3
Richmond 20
Fairfax 75
NVA 77
Beach 79
VDA 101
SYC 168
Revolution 216

Again no one cares, this is a 2012 thread

Who cares about the rankings app when these teams play head to head regularly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2011 Rankings per the Ranking App:

Team National Ranking
Arlington 3
Richmond 20
Fairfax 75
NVA 77
Beach 79
VDA 101
SYC 168
Revolution 216

Again no one cares, this is a 2012 thread

Who cares about the rankings app when these teams play head to head regularly?

Who cares about 2011 rankings on a 2012 thread

[Anonymous]

New DMV 2012G ECNL team coming soon.....
Stayed tuned..