Fairfax Union Girls ECNL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:08s have a bunch of girls NVA and VDA do not want. Lots of girls on the 08s that got cut from NVA or VDA.

Some may have and some may have left for other reasons but, regardless, Union tied the 2 Charlotte teams last year and Brave beat them both. Brave lost their 2 top scorers, but FVU retained enough between the 2 teams to show better than this past weekend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:08s have a bunch of girls NVA and VDA do not want. Lots of girls on the 08s that got cut from NVA or VDA.

Some may have and some may have left for other reasons but, regardless, Union tied the 2 Charlotte teams last year and Brave beat them both. Brave lost their 2 top scorers, but FVU retained enough between the 2 teams to show better than this past weekend.

Perhaps the problem is deciding which players to activate and play together within the 25 they have rostered?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With Arlington, i'm sure it will be fruitful, but does it matter? For 2010s it went from 80 2-3 times (not same 80 each time) at u14 to 24 at u15 is pretty telling about who is on the track and who isnt for this highest level at the youngest relevant age.

For 2011 training center Bethesda, Arlington, VDA 2011 all have 4. VDA 2010 has 1. NVA 2011 has 3.

Seem right in general but does VDA has 4? or that is BP doing? but then 2010 has 1 so I guess BP doesn't really have that much power to push?

4 for vda is probably okay. They finished 3rd in MA last year. Arlington should have 6 or 7 though.

Be grateful.

Chill out A-town papa, best teams usually only get 5 at most. They see Arlington as an elite team already with 4 so be grateful cause last year this area's best team BSC had 5 at u14 but zero this fall at u15. On the flip side Surf had 5 last year and 3 of those 5 are on the shorter list of 24 this fall for u15. Will Arlington be BSC or Surf for the 2011 group one year from now?

LOL! I think we know the answer already...Be grateful for rigtt now

BSC 2010 has 3 this year.

https://www.ussoccer.com/stories/2024/09/us-u...-camp-september-2024

What you talking about Willis?

No one from round these parts on this very recent list, it happened last week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With Arlington, i'm sure it will be fruitful, but does it matter? For 2010s it went from 80 2-3 times (not same 80 each time) at u14 to 24 at u15 is pretty telling about who is on the track and who isnt for this highest level at the youngest relevant age.

For 2011 training center Bethesda, Arlington, VDA 2011 all have 4. VDA 2010 has 1. NVA 2011 has 3.

Seem right in general but does VDA has 4? or that is BP doing? but then 2010 has 1 so I guess BP doesn't really have that much power to push?

4 for vda is probably okay. They finished 3rd in MA last year. Arlington should have 6 or 7 though.

Be grateful.

Chill out A-town papa, best teams usually only get 5 at most. They see Arlington as an elite team already with 4 so be grateful cause last year this area's best team BSC had 5 at u14 but zero this fall at u15. On the flip side Surf had 5 last year and 3 of those 5 are on the shorter list of 24 this fall for u15. Will Arlington be BSC or Surf for the 2011 group one year from now?

LOL! I think we know the answer already...Be grateful for rigtt now

BSC 2010 has 3 this year.

https://www.ussoccer.com/stories/2024/09/us-under-15-womens-youth-national-team-roster-training-camp-september-2024

What you talking about Willis?

No one from round these parts on this very recent list, it happened last week.

[Anonymous]

People continue to confuse talent ID center invites and actual YNT camps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People continue to confuse talent ID center invites and actual YNT camps.

It's because they don't know any better, just let them have the "win"

[Anonymous]

Always winning they're soooo good

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People continue to confuse talent ID center invites and actual YNT camps.

It's because they don't know any better, just let them have the "win"

Lot of assumptions. Invite is a good accomplishment for the players or clubs and u do know only 24 kids get selected from all over the country so to make it at all, let them brag a little.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People continue to confuse talent ID center invites and actual YNT camps.

It's because they don't know any better, just let them have the "win"

Lot of assumptions. Invite is a good accomplishment for the players or clubs and u do know only 24 kids get selected from all over the country so to make it at all, let them brag a little.

Posts like these are what confuse people, again, NTC isn't a YNT invite. Still an accomplishment, but don't get it twisted.

[Anonymous]

It's primarily for marketing. The only most recent notable's for YNT have been from VDA and former FCV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's primarily for marketing. The only most recent notable's for YNT have been from VDA and former FCV.

A Union 07 started the final (along w/ the former FCV) of the CONCACAF U17 Final earlier this year.

[Anonymous]

FVU is about to get worked by Arlington in the younger age groups this season. 2011s are already superior, 2012-2014 are trending better than the Fairfax Co. clubs that should feed FVU, 2010 Arlingtons have taken players and have closed gap, and 2009s are improved. The shift was coming slowly, its finally here after another disastrous Union attempt to save face and their ECNL badge.

[Anonymous]

Hot Take Thursday!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FVU is about to get worked by Arlington in the younger age groups this season. 2011s are already superior, 2012-2014 are trending better than the Fairfax Co. clubs that should feed FVU, 2010 Arlingtons have taken players and have closed gap, and 2009s are improved. The shift was coming slowly, its finally here after another disastrous Union attempt to save face and their ECNL badge.

Who cares about the 13 year olds? They all leave Arlington by U-15 to go to McLean given college placement track record which is far superior to anything Arlington has put forward in the past 5 years..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FVU is about to get worked by Arlington in the younger age groups this season. 2011s are already superior, 2012-2014 are trending better than the Fairfax Co. clubs that should feed FVU, 2010 Arlingtons have taken players and have closed gap, and 2009s are improved. The shift was coming slowly, its finally here after another disastrous Union attempt to save face and their ECNL badge.

I thought "poached" is the word used around here. Or, is "poached" only used when a team one doesn't support gets players from another club?