
As a Catholic that’s what pisses me off. It’s acceptable on this forum to continually bash Catholics and Catholicism, but god forbid anyone write a word about any other religion. |
+1 You said it. So wrong. |
The "beauty" is deceiving. From afar it is beautiful. Once you step on campus, you come across a mishmash of buildings and concrete which are not aesthetically appealing and don't in any way visually seem like they belong in the same space. It was really a disappointment for us as well. |
It’s a very old school—1789–in a small urban space. Very difficult to manage development, given those constraints. |
Dayton isn’t Jesuit. Duh. |
DP here. So? Beauty is subjective. People might think you are ugly, but they don't come to DCUM to post about you. |
BAHAHA. |
I realize this, but it doesn't change the fact that aesthetically it is unappealing. |
It’s not Catholic, frankly, imo. SoJ are fringe. Several are heretics. I was appalled at the behavior and filthy language (to include a little spitting) by the students when a gender-critical speaker was on campus. Oh, and that (now defunct) Instagram “Cash n’ Trash” Gtown Hot Mess” was horrifying. I did indeed clutch my Mikimoto pearls. |
Georgetown is a gorgeous campus, OP. If you don't like it, don't apply, same as any other school. |
Nonsense. And the IG photos were staged. If you don't realize that, then you are not smart enough to be accepted, so don't fret, OP. |
The beauty is deceiving in that it’s hard to describe. There’s an esoteric term that captures its elusive beauty…oh yeah: ugly. |
Not nearly as ugly as people who come to DCUM to post about schools that did not accept them. |
Yup. When I got into Georgetown SFS early, and turned down UChicago, campus aesthetics weren’t hugely important to me. Nor were they that important when I graduated with a 3.85/magna cum laude. Sorry a lot of you couldn’t have done that. Not our problem. |
The OP was accepted. |