The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

Wait, didn't he also try to spin his getting fired was just that he needed to spend more time with the girls? And turns out in reality he has a full time nanny with them while he's not even working? SHADY.

Very. I'm surprised his lawyer allows all this. He's supposedly some big time celebrity lawyer, David Bullitt or something like that, but this doesn't seem very rational from his client

I just looked up the lawyer. He's giving off shady a$$ vibes

Ehh, he seems like a decent guy: https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-magazine/september-october-2018/talking-shop/

A decent guy that thinks it's okay for kids to wear masks inside all day? Not a chance.

[Anonymous]

The lawyer is decent, not the insane Kane.

[Anonymous]

I heard bobby bones will take over the Kane show and riley/rose are going to be running the night show.

[Anonymous]

I’m not sure what Natasha is hoping to accomplish by broadcasting all of this on social media. I don’t think Kane has a job anymore (??) so it’s not like he has to worry about getting fired. If public shaming worked this conflict would’ve been over years ago.

[Anonymous]

Kane has the best face for radio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what Natasha is hoping to accomplish by broadcasting all of this on social media. I don’t think Kane has a job anymore (??) so it’s not like he has to worry about getting fired. If public shaming worked this conflict would’ve been over years ago.

He has to worry about finding a new job, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what Natasha is hoping to accomplish by broadcasting all of this on social media. I don’t think Kane has a job anymore (??) so it’s not like he has to worry about getting fired. If public shaming worked this conflict would’ve been over years ago.

He has to worry about finding a new job, though.

She’s trying to bring what he does in the dark into the light. Clearly he operates as if there are no consequences to this, but we all know there are. Maybe she hopes he will be shamed into doing the right thing because she knows he cares deeply for his public image. It’s why he tried to make her the villain.

[Anonymous]

What I love the most is that you people make up facts. Then take position on those facts. And then are disgusted about the facts that you just made up. The truth is made up of 3 components; Her facts which she is posting; his facts which he has not posted and the truth.

If you believe he has control of any of the Kane Show social media accounts you are delusional.

But I am enjoying the made up facts. It adds to the drama and makes for good reading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What I love the most is that you people make up facts. Then take position on those facts. And then are disgusted about the facts that you just made up. The truth is made up of 3 components; Her facts which she is posting; his facts which he has not posted and the truth.

If you believe he has control of any of the Kane Show social media accounts you are delusional.

But I am enjoying the made up facts. It adds to the drama and makes for good reading.

Who controls them then? iHeart? Enlighten us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I love the most is that you people make up facts. Then take position on those facts. And then are disgusted about the facts that you just made up. The truth is made up of 3 components; Her facts which she is posting; his facts which he has not posted and the truth.

If you believe he has control of any of the Kane Show social media accounts you are delusional.

But I am enjoying the made up facts. It adds to the drama and makes for good reading.

Who controls them then? iHeart? Enlighten us.

Not PP but definitely interns or someone else on the company payroll. ‘Kane Show’ account wasn’t ‘Pete’s’ (that’s his name right?) and anything coming from that ‘Kane Show’ account had to be held accountable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I love the most is that you people make up facts. Then take position on those facts. And then are disgusted about the facts that you just made up. The truth is made up of 3 components; Her facts which she is posting; his facts which he has not posted and the truth.

If you believe he has control of any of the Kane Show social media accounts you are delusional.

But I am enjoying the made up facts. It adds to the drama and makes for good reading.

Who controls them then? iHeart? Enlighten us.

Not PP but definitely interns or someone else on the company payroll. ‘Kane Show’ account wasn’t ‘Pete’s’ (that’s his name right?) and anything coming from that ‘Kane Show’ account had to be held accountable.

But if the show doesn’t exist anymore, why would anyone post anything?

[Anonymous]

Those accounts are owned by iHeart media. Just like the old website. The content is strictly control by them. Just like his on radio breakdown. There is no way he would have been on air pouring his "heart" out without the highest level of approvals.

[Anonymous]

I worry about the girls. Neither of their parents are employed...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I love the most is that you people make up facts. Then take position on those facts. And then are disgusted about the facts that you just made up. The truth is made up of 3 components; Her facts which she is posting; his facts which he has not posted and the truth.

If you believe he has control of any of the Kane Show social media accounts you are delusional.

But I am enjoying the made up facts. It adds to the drama and makes for good reading.

Who controls them then? iHeart? Enlighten us.

Not PP but definitely interns or someone else on the company payroll. ‘Kane Show’ account wasn’t ‘Pete’s’ (that’s his name right?) and anything coming from that ‘Kane Show’ account had to be held accountable.

But if the show doesn’t exist anymore, why would anyone post anything?

My post was typed in past tense, but good point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I love the most is that you people make up facts. Then take position on those facts. And then are disgusted about the facts that you just made up. The truth is made up of 3 components; Her facts which she is posting; his facts which he has not posted and the truth.

If you believe he has control of any of the Kane Show social media accounts you are delusional.

But I am enjoying the made up facts. It adds to the drama and makes for good reading.

Who controls them then? iHeart? Enlighten us.

Not PP but definitely interns or someone else on the company payroll. ‘Kane Show’ account wasn’t ‘Pete’s’ (that’s his name right?) and anything coming from that ‘Kane Show’ account had to be held accountable.

Not necessarily true. DJ's have their own accounts, it's the station accounts they don't control.