The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The baby may live with him? Like an au pair. She was probably the one driving them to school in the am when Kane was on the show

An au pair when you don't have kids with you 24/7 and you don't even have a job is a little hilarious.

+1

[Anonymous]

Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

[Anonymous]

I heard Kane is a fat pig . Any truth to that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard Kane has ptsd

From what, his stressful career making up fake radio bits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard Kane is a fat pig . Any truth to that?

It’s wiki verified

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His OCD and COVID19 may be the source of Natasha’s dilemma.

https://www.apa.org/topics/covid-19/managing-ocd

Then he should man up and leave the kids at her house until he feels comfortable enough to follow the visitation schedule without completely unreasonable demands.

Do you know if her husband is still working? Do you know if Natasha has people coming over to her house. I mean we don’t know why he insists on this. My guess is he probably believes they aren’t being safe.

Doubtful

DP. Why would he insist if the girls have been there regularly anyway? Why wear masks now? All that does is protect others, not them. His nanny coming and going out of the home is also a risk. I bet she can tell the best stories of all lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

Wait, didn't he also try to spin his getting fired was just that he needed to spend more time with the girls? And turns out in reality he has a full time nanny with them while he's not even working? SHADY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

Wait, didn't he also try to spin his getting fired was just that he needed to spend more time with the girls? And turns out in reality he has a full time nanny with them while he's not even working? SHADY.

Very. I'm surprised his lawyer allows all this. He's supposedly some big time celebrity lawyer, David Bullitt or something like that, but this doesn't seem very rational from his client

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Huh. Of all things to delete, that’s a weird one. Their poor kids are going to be in therapy for years over this..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

Wait, didn't he also try to spin his getting fired was just that he needed to spend more time with the girls? And turns out in reality he has a full time nanny with them while he's not even working? SHADY.

Very. I'm surprised his lawyer allows all this. He's supposedly some big time celebrity lawyer, David Bullitt or something like that, but this doesn't seem very rational from his client

I just looked up the lawyer. He's giving off shady a$$ vibes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha removed the part about him ‘not working’ from her post. Interesting...

Whatevs. He still doesn't need a nanny even IF he was working at home. There are plenty of single parents out there with more kids than he has that are teleworking right now that don't have a nanny. Sounds to me like he doesn't want to be a full time parent.

True, yet he tries to keep them from their mom who seems to desperately want them. Just makes him look like a big selfish manchild yikes.

Wait, didn't he also try to spin his getting fired was just that he needed to spend more time with the girls? And turns out in reality he has a full time nanny with them while he's not even working? SHADY.

Very. I'm surprised his lawyer allows all this. He's supposedly some big time celebrity lawyer, David Bullitt or something like that, but this doesn't seem very rational from his client

I just looked up the lawyer. He's giving off shady a$$ vibes

Ehh, he seems like a decent guy: https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-magazine/september-october-2018/talking-shop/

[Anonymous]

Must be quite a shock to not have people on the payroll who have to agree and do whatever he says all day. Wonder how much of his "radio family" are around now that he's just Peter and not Kane? The loss of control and no life outside of work is clearly making him spiral. Those poor kids.