What was wrong with what they said. No one in the cabinet is qualified. Hegseth? Kristy? Linda McMahon with didn't know the different between AI and A1 steak sauce? |
Nearly the entire cabinet/admin is fox news/reality show/online personalities: Hegseth, Duffy, Judge Box O Wine, Bongino, Linda McMahon. These people are not qualified in any way shape or form for their positions. They just happen to know Trump and align with his vision of the White House as a Reality Show. |
Dumbing down the curriculum because "diverse" students can't handle the subject matter has been around a long time Jeannie Oakes asked for it to to be formalized across the country and it was under the umbrella of DEI. Randi Weingarten had more power than Miguel Cardona ever did. The progressives have completed their rot. You think you can just run away from progressive ideas now?? This is gonna be uber inconvenient for you: you can't. |
Because when you have a reckoning that paints all white people as oppressors and white supremacists, people push back. We can't control our skin color, but we can vote for the backlash that is happening. |
Only in 9th grade, in an attempt to encourage all students to continue with science. Education has debated this concept for ages — do we differentiate or not? It just so happens that the students in the article are predominately poor or minority and for a variety of reasons are not as prepared as their academically-advanced peers. So check your DEI assumptions. I’m sure there are a few white people in the mix. |
Posts like this and then posts that we are pushing kids too hard, overschedule them, push too hard for taking Algebra I in 6th grade. Narrative seems to change for convenience. |
Oh and every kid takes like 9 APs just for state school admission. |
LOL |
Unless you're Michael Jackson |
If it should, why didn’t it? |
Nailed it ⬆️ |
Hey Republicans: you voted for this. |
BLM is one organization. It is not now nor has it ever been the entirety of DEI. Heck it wasn’t even the main thing. |
Agree, it was never the "thing" - smearing DEI while invoking BLM is just a contorted right wing talking point from people who don't know better (but think they do). BLM was barely even an organization. It had some "founders" some of whom like Patrice Cuillors were accused of grifting, but there was never any central BLM organization "in charge" or doing much coordinating. Meanwhile on the right there has also been a ton of grifting and cons from organizations like Club for Growth, FreedomWorks, Tea Party Patriots and others who were mostly just in it for the money. Not to mention what the NRA and other right wing organizations turned into. So I don't even get what the PP's point is. |
Please cite the moment that "historical"/"Traditional" discrimination stopped. |