Trump’s Dementia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

They do not truly need to ask - they already know the answer.

[Anonymous]

With his filter gone, sometimes he displays rare insight into himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

+1

Old age aside. Dementia aside. He was never actually qualified for the job in absolutely any way.

[Anonymous]

He is a puppet, so is fulfilling the expectations of whoever is the master. Scary times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

Personally, I don’t really care if the president is brilliant. Character and judgment are more important to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

Personally, I don’t really care if the president is brilliant. Character and judgment are more important to me.

OK, so other bases on which to disqualify Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

Personally, I don’t really care if the president is brilliant. Character and judgment are more important to me.

He’s a corrupt and moronic child raper. He’s covered the bases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

Personally, I don’t really care if the president is brilliant. Character and judgment are more important to me.

People with character and judgement attract loyal competent staff. Trump has a bunch of total losers on his cabinet.

Trump is Joe Biden with an incompetent untrustworthy staff.

[Anonymous]

Laura Ingraham is a huge Trump supporter, but even she raised an important point during one of her monologues regarding his abilities to fully understand the complex realities of the Iran war:

“Was the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning?” she asked viewers of The Ingraham Angle. “And was he then able to take it all in and understand the complexity of this—how complex it could actually get?”

She then added pointedly: “Or was he told this would be relatively quick, in and out?”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good point. People expect Presidents to know this sh!t.

The expectation is for the POTUS to be able to process a great deal of information from daily briefings, prioritize initiatives and then to delegate responsibility of handling initiatives to their staff. Doing this at the expected level of expertise is something the best and brightest 50 to 60 years old have struggled with but they've been able to get the job done most of the time 24/7/365.

Expecting elderly people to handle this daily intense responsibility is asinine and this is why we never elected elderly presidents until our electorate recently lost it's GD mind.

It is absolutely insane that these words even need to be said. It seems obvious to me that the potus should be someone who is absolutely brilliant and in the prime of their life. The best and the brightest this country has to offer. But no. We get a game show host who clearly could not pass a HS civics exam. They have to ask themselves if all this information is just too much for him to take in. As if we are talking about an elementary school child who needs classroom instruction scaffolded to their level.

There is not an employer in this country who would hire Trump right now for any job. Yet we let him run the free world. Incredible.

He's just being used by his Christian nationalist handlers and corporate billionaire bros. He's in the exact condition they had hoped he would be in by now. They couldn't have asked for a better situation. Dying grandpa who thinks it's 1970 is babbling on the couch and they're bringing him updated copies of the will for him to sign.

[Anonymous]

Trump:
“I said to [Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought], ‘Don’t send any money for daycare because the United States can’t take care of daycare.’ We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people,” Trump said. “We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare. ”

Did someone mention he should go to elder daycare? A bit defensive on the response huh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump:
“I said to [Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought], ‘Don’t send any money for daycare because the United States can’t take care of daycare.’ We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people,” Trump said. “We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare. ”

Did someone mention he should go to elder daycare? A bit defensive on the response huh

When will foxnews serve their viewers and show them this stuff?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham is a huge Trump supporter, but even she raised an important point during one of her monologues regarding his abilities to fully understand the complex realities of the Iran war:

“Was the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning?” she asked viewers of The Ingraham Angle. “And was he then able to take it all in and understand the complexity of this—how complex it could actually get?”

She then added pointedly: “Or was he told this would be relatively quick, in and out?”

Is she questioning Trump's abilities or setting up someone else for the fall by implying they told Trump it would be over relatively quick?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham is a huge Trump supporter, but even she raised an important point during one of her monologues regarding his abilities to fully understand the complex realities of the Iran war:

“Was the president fully briefed about the risks of all of this from the beginning?” she asked viewers of The Ingraham Angle. “And was he then able to take it all in and understand the complexity of this—how complex it could actually get?”

She then added pointedly: “Or was he told this would be relatively quick, in and out?”

Is she questioning Trump's abilities or setting up someone else for the fall by implying they told Trump it would be over relatively quick?

Exactly my thoughts. Bingo

She means Lindsay Graham.

But no Trump would never be “to blame.” Only his advisors.