Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read this was just a win on the privacy aspect and not in regards to the copyright claim which is still in litigation. Why aren’t they suing People mag too for the same thing?

Complete victory. Sorry.

Game, Set and Match for Duchess Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are a college graduate, then you are an actress, then you become a princess in the most popular Royal family, but that is not enough for you! Oh, no, you want more, so much more!
So, you become an influencer, but you don't tell us what you are trying to influence us about!
Now, that is a story of unparalleled success!

And you, loser on a forum commenting and choking on your bike. How does it feel.

dp I know you meant "bile" but bike sounds funny. I never even think of either one of them!

[Anonymous]

seems weird that people are obsessed with this woman. she wrote a letter to her dad (who does this - in calligraphy no less), leaked it to people magazine through her five anonymous "friends", then sued her own dad when he published excerpts of the letter?

trashy dad, trashy meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:seems weird that people are obsessed with this woman. she wrote a letter to her dad (who does this - in calligraphy no less), leaked it to people magazine through her five anonymous "friends", then sued her own dad when he published excerpts of the letter?

trashy dad, trashy meghan.

Her “leaking” the letter to people (the leak was its existence not the actual text) has nothing to do with whether a different publication violated her privacy by printing excerpts. Hence why they just got the legal smack down on the privacy claim.

Also I used to write my grandfather in calligraphy. Different strokes for different folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:seems weird that people are obsessed with this woman. she wrote a letter to her dad (who does this - in calligraphy no less), leaked it to people magazine through her five anonymous "friends", then sued her own dad when he published excerpts of the letter?

trashy dad, trashy meghan.

Her “leaking” the letter to people (the leak was its existence not the actual text) has nothing to do with whether a different publication violated her privacy by printing excerpts. Hence why they just got the legal smack down on the privacy claim.

Also I used to write my grandfather in calligraphy. Different strokes for different folks.

She also never sued her dad. Funny you mention people are obsessed but you’re so fixated you’re making shit up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:seems weird that people are obsessed with this woman. she wrote a letter to her dad (who does this - in calligraphy no less), leaked it to people magazine through her five anonymous "friends", then sued her own dad when he published excerpts of the letter?

trashy dad, trashy meghan.

People who know how. Writing is such a lost art. Texting is the quick and indifferent mode of communication these day. Good for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read this was just a win on the privacy aspect and not in regards to the copyright claim which is still in litigation. Why aren’t they suing People mag too for the same thing?

Complete victory. Sorry.

Game, Set and Match for Duchess Meghan.

I didn't think she wanted to be in the Royal family so why call her Duchess?

[Anonymous]

Excellent win for them. Well done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does it matter?

Her own family is trash talking her in a new book and to any media outlet that pays.

And, she doesn’t really want privacy. She just wants to control the narrative. She wants to be a respected influencer who gets paid well enough to support a celebrity lifestyle.

+100
She's plain trash. I agree she merely wants to control the narrative. Her claiming privacy rights is so two faced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it matter?

Her own family is trash talking her in a new book and to any media outlet that pays.

And, she doesn’t really want privacy. She just wants to control the narrative. She wants to be a respected influencer who gets paid well enough to support a celebrity lifestyle.

+100
She's plain trash. I agree she merely wants to control the narrative. Her claiming privacy rights is so two faced.

And yet she won. Deuces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does it matter?

Her own family is trash talking her in a new book and to any media outlet that pays.

And, she doesn’t really want privacy. She just wants to control the narrative. She wants to be a respected influencer who gets paid well enough to support a celebrity lifestyle.

+100
She's plain trash. I agree she merely wants to control the narrative. Her claiming privacy rights is so two faced.

So???? Not wanting people to talk trash about you isn’t trashy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read this was just a win on the privacy aspect and not in regards to the copyright claim which is still in litigation. Why aren’t they suing People mag too for the same thing?

Complete victory. Sorry.

Game, Set and Match for Duchess Meghan.

I didn't think she wanted to be in the Royal family so why call her Duchess?

Because that’s what’s on Archie’s birth certificate.

[Anonymous]

Divorce will have to wait. She’s pregnant again!

https://www.eonline.com/news/1083203/meghan-markle-is-pregnant-expecting-baby-no-2-with-prince-harry

[Anonymous]

OMG - so happy for them! What a lovely announcement.

[Anonymous]

Yay - little sibling for Archie. They seem so happy.