I believe it is only one wacko. |
| Have there been threads dedicated to the Kate hater? |
I believe Kate carries an elegant look well and has grown into looking the part of a Queen Condort. Doesn’t mean I’m going to ignore Palace lies when I see it. |
Maybe it is Rose Hanbury with a google alert on her name
|
Has to be. |
She looks amazing here and at the banquet. I don’t know which wacko thinks Rose is more beautiful than Kate. |
DP. I don’t think anyone thinks that she is more beautiful. But I do think that she has a certain appeal to men maybe? She was a lingerie model, had some sort of weird something with tony blair if memory serves, and even though her husband is way older he seems pretty eligible (very wealthy, titled, not bad looking for his age). I personally don’t see it but one of my male friends said he preferred Rose to kate. Totally blew my mind but there’s a lid for every pot. |
| For all the talk of Rose having been a model, I cannot find more than 3 or 4 actual professional photos of her online. Sounds like more of a rich-girl vanity thing more than an actual career, which makes sense—she is thin with big eyes, but she’s horsy with bad posture and not model-hot (and I say this as someone with the same English bony-big eyed-horsy look). |
|
| Rose is just NOT attractive. And she looks like a child next to her husband. |
| Rose and Kate are likely far more attractive than anyone else commenting on this board. They are also more alike looks-wise than different, being tall, thin brunettes. They are both human beings, wives and mothers. Therefore judging them solely on looks as if they are auditioning for a film or magazine cover is ridiculous. |
She seems to have this particular kind of overbred English deformity where her lower jaw seems squashed. Prince Andrew's daughters have the same. Kate, thankfully, isn't marred by centuries of inbreeding so she's just regular pretty. |
This is sweet, but you are making up a fantasy. We have no idea what the state of their marriage is. We don't know whether they are good parents or not. All we have are carefully choreographed appearances and interviews, managed by a sophisticated publicity machine. You (and also the people who are convinced William is cheating) are reading tea leaves and making up stories based on little information. It is true that if William hasn't cheated, he would be a statistical anomaly for a British royal. That at least is something factual. But we don't know anything factual about whether he has or hasn't, whether they have a good marriage or not, etc. Everything you wrote and the people who are convinced he is cheating is just wild speculation. |
Why wouldn't they have an ideal marriage though? Just look at it come a common sense perspective. Two very attractive people (Kate much more so than William of course with his hair loss but he does have a good body if you like your men lean). Very long history together, tons of mutual friends. No problems there. Tons of money and even more help than most rich people have. So they're not going to be having any of the arguments we normal people have about spending, where to live, where to work/how much to work, division of household chores, who is doing more with the children, etc. The one point of contention I can see is his whackadoo family and the job. BUT she certainly knew what she was getting into with that so I doubt she takes her frustration, if she feels any, out on him. She wouldn't have a leg to stand on in any arguments about it. "I want to spend Christmas with my family." "Can't. We need to go to Granny's. You KNEW this was an issue from the get go." |
Since when has common sense dictated marital happiness? There are many divorced couples who, based the outside facts, should have been very happy with their lives. And, yet. We have no idea what the true state of their marriage is. Anyone who pretends they do is just living a fantasy (one way or the other). |