PARCC Scores for Grades 3-8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something else interesting is to see the % of white kids increase. From 4% of 4th graders 10 years ago to 12% now.

No other group has shown such an increase.

https://public.tableau.com/profile/kevin.lang#!/vizhome/DemographicsofTestTakers/Demographics

Thanks for pointing that out. That is interesting and several things can be broadly extrapolated such as more high SES families sticking it out in DCPS than ever before. And also the rise of charter middle school options (Latin and Basis) give more high SES (most of them are white) confidence that their kid has a real "pathway to middle school"--if we got rid of Basis and Latin I think we see that 4 grade white percentage drop back down to 4% very very quickly.

Agreed, though Deal and Hardy both have increased their size/draw of white students.

[Anonymous]

Where is the grade-by-grade breakout?
I think I am definitely seeing a significant skew favoring schools that include lower grades as opposed to schools which only serve middle school and up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is the grade-by-grade breakout?
I think I am definitely seeing a significant skew favoring schools that include lower grades as opposed to schools which only serve middle school and up.

The link 16:10 posted will allow you to filter by grade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What stands out to me is that Janney is not all it's cracked up to be. Sure, it has the highest overall scores, but that is because they have zero minority or low income students testing. If you drill down to white only performance, Janney has 69% on math, a whole 13-15 points below Eaton, Oyster, Stoddert, Yu Ying, even 9-11 points below Watkins and Hearst. In fact, they rank 14 out of 16th of elementary schools with White student performance in math and 6th out of 16th in ELA.

You don't need to drill down, look at Math/All:

Ross 74.5
Lafayette 72.9
Stoddert 72.4
Murch 68.8
Eaton 67.3
Janney 66.9
Key 65.1
Mann 60.8

(Two of the KIPP schools are in this range too, but they don't have 5th grade.)

The takeaway is quite different. It's that at schools like Key, Mann and Janney, there are English-as-a-second-language white kids. The ELL don't come from the black or hispanic student populations, but from the white populations (owing to the embassy folk attending those schools).

I think you misunderstood. This is Math/ALL not Math/ELL (LOL!)

Mmm... I read it differently, it seems that Janney is doing a greater job than the other schools for its non white students. Its score is actually better on the overall population than on the white students only !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What stands out to me is that Janney is not all it's cracked up to be. Sure, it has the highest overall scores, but that is because they have zero minority or low income students testing. If you drill down to white only performance, Janney has 69% on math, a whole 13-15 points below Eaton, Oyster, Stoddert, Yu Ying, even 9-11 points below Watkins and Hearst. In fact, they rank 14 out of 16th of elementary schools with White student performance in math and 6th out of 16th in ELA.

Sorry 13 out of 15 (had Basis in first look) in math and 5 out of 15 in ELA
MATH white
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 84.10%
Stoddert ES 83.50%
Maury ES 83.30%
Washington Yu Ying PCS 83.30%
Eaton ES 82.30%
Watkins ES Capitol Hill Cluster 80.80%
Lafayette ES 80.60%
Hearst ES 78.10%
Murch ES 77.50%
Two Rivers PCS 73.20%
Key ES 72.40%
Mann ES 70.70%
Janney ES 69.40%
Brent ES 65.50%
Hyde Addison ES 63.80%

White ELA

Oyster Adams Bilingual School 85.20%
Two Rivers PCS 83.90%
Eaton ES 83.30%
Mann ES 82.80%
Janney ES 82.60%
Stoddert ES 80.80%
Watkins ES Capitol Hill Cluster 80.80%
Brent ES 80.00%
Lafayette ES 76.80%
Murch ES 76.60%
Washington Yu Ying PCS 76.20%
Maury ES 75.00%
Hyde Addison ES 74.50%
Key ES 73.30%
Hearst ES 71.90%

AVERAGE:
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 84.65%
Eaton ES 82.80%
Stoddert ES 82.15%
Watkins ES Capitol Hill Cluster 80.80%
Washington Yu Ying PCS 79.75%
Maury ES 79.15%
Lafayette ES 78.70%
Two Rivers PCS 78.55%
Murch ES 77.05%
Mann ES 76.75%
Janney ES 76.00%
Hearst ES 75.00%
Key ES 72.85%
Brent ES 72.75%
Hyde Addison ES 69.15%

It's official, Eaton and Stoddert have to be invited in the JKLM club. In fact, they should be the Pres and VP

WOW....+100. Janney should be on academic probation.

Yes, we are all vindicated !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What stands out to me is that Janney is not all it's cracked up to be. Sure, it has the highest overall scores, but that is because they have zero minority or low income students testing. If you drill down to white only performance, Janney has 69% on math, a whole 13-15 points below Eaton, Oyster, Stoddert, Yu Ying, even 9-11 points below Watkins and Hearst. In fact, they rank 14 out of 16th of elementary schools with White student performance in math and 6th out of 16th in ELA.

Sorry 13 out of 15 (had Basis in first look) in math and 5 out of 15 in ELA
MATH white
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 84.10%
Stoddert ES 83.50%
Maury ES 83.30%
Washington Yu Ying PCS 83.30%
Eaton ES 82.30%
Watkins ES Capitol Hill Cluster 80.80%
Lafayette ES 80.60%
Hearst ES 78.10%
Murch ES 77.50%
Two Rivers PCS 73.20%
Key ES 72.40%
Mann ES 70.70%
Janney ES 69.40%
Brent ES 65.50%
Hyde Addison ES 63.80%

White ELA

Oyster Adams Bilingual School 85.20%
Two Rivers PCS 83.90%
Eaton ES 83.30%
Mann ES 82.80%
Janney ES 82.60%
Stoddert ES 80.80%
Watkins ES Capitol Hill Cluster 80.80%
Brent ES 80.00%
Lafayette ES 76.80%
Murch ES 76.60%
Washington Yu Ying PCS 76.20%
Maury ES 75.00%
Hyde Addison ES 74.50%
Key ES 73.30%
Hearst ES 71.90%

AVERAGE:
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 84.65%
Eaton ES 82.80%
Stoddert ES 82.15%
Watkins ES Capitol Hill Cluster 80.80%
Washington Yu Ying PCS 79.75%
Maury ES 79.15%
Lafayette ES 78.70%
Two Rivers PCS 78.55%
Murch ES 77.05%
Mann ES 76.75%
Janney ES 76.00%
Hearst ES 75.00%
Key ES 72.85%
Brent ES 72.75%
Hyde Addison ES 69.15%

It's official, Eaton and Stoddert have to be invited in the JKLM club. In fact, they should be the Pres and VP

WOW....+100. Janney should be on academic probation.

Yes, we are all vindicated !

All those schools, AND the parents involved, are doing a very good job at educating their children.

How many more schools are there in DC? like a hundred more? That's the real conversation to have: why those schools, AND the parents in question, are doing such a lousy job in educating their children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What stands out to me is that Janney is not all it's cracked up to be. Sure, it has the highest overall scores, but that is because they have zero minority or low income students testing. If you drill down to white only performance, Janney has 69% on math, a whole 13-15 points below Eaton, Oyster, Stoddert, Yu Ying, even 9-11 points below Watkins and Hearst. In fact, they rank 14 out of 16th of elementary schools with White student performance in math and 6th out of 16th in ELA.

You don't need to drill down, look at Math/All:

Ross 74.5
Lafayette 72.9
Stoddert 72.4
Murch 68.8
Eaton 67.3
Janney 66.9
Key 65.1
Mann 60.8

(Two of the KIPP schools are in this range too, but they don't have 5th grade.)

The takeaway is quite different. It's that at schools like Key, Mann and Janney, there are English-as-a-second-language white kids. The ELL don't come from the black or hispanic student populations, but from the white populations (owing to the embassy folk attending those schools).

I think you misunderstood. This is Math/ALL not Math/ELL (LOL!)

Mmm... I read it differently, it seems that Janney is doing a greater job than the other schools for its non white students. Its score is actually better on the overall population than on the white students only !

Nice try spin doctor. There were less than 25 minority students that tested, add to that Janney only has 2% low income.

[Anonymous]

What math curriculum does Janney use?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What math curriculum does Janney use?

Apparently Enron math if the parents think white students scoring in 60s is good, or as most Janney boosters say "best and only option in the city"....Ha! Watkins killed them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What math curriculum does Janney use?

Apparently Enron math if the parents think white students scoring in 60s is good, or as most Janney boosters say "best and only option in the city"....Ha! Watkins killed them!

Yes Watkins is fine for high SES students, so long as they don't mind the many children who need social workers. But the real problem for Watkins is the Stuart Hobson scores. Oy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What stands out to me is that Janney is not all it's cracked up to be. Sure, it has the highest overall scores, but that is because they have zero minority or low income students testing. If you drill down to white only performance, Janney has 69% on math, a whole 13-15 points below Eaton, Oyster, Stoddert, Yu Ying, even 9-11 points below Watkins and Hearst. In fact, they rank 14 out of 16th of elementary schools with White student performance in math and 6th out of 16th in ELA.

You don't need to drill down, look at Math/All:

Ross 74.5
Lafayette 72.9
Stoddert 72.4
Murch 68.8
Eaton 67.3
Janney 66.9
Key 65.1
Mann 60.8

(Two of the KIPP schools are in this range too, but they don't have 5th grade.)

The takeaway is quite different. It's that at schools like Key, Mann and Janney, there are English-as-a-second-language white kids. The ELL don't come from the black or hispanic student populations, but from the white populations (owing to the embassy folk attending those schools).

I think you misunderstood. This is Math/ALL not Math/ELL (LOL!)

Mmm... I read it differently, it seems that Janney is doing a greater job than the other schools for its non white students. Its score is actually better on the overall population than on the white students only !

Nice try spin doctor. There were less than 25 minority students that tested, add to that Janney only has 2% low income.

Yes I know Janney sucks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What math curriculum does Janney use?

Apparently Enron math if the parents think white students scoring in 60s is good, or as most Janney boosters say "best and only option in the city"....Ha! Watkins killed them!

Really? Janney boosters now? You are a sad human being, PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What math curriculum does Janney use?

Apparently Enron math if the parents think white students scoring in 60s is good, or as most Janney boosters say "best and only option in the city"....Ha! Watkins killed them!

Really? Janney boosters now? You are a sad human being, PP.

Ha ha. As if Janney needed boosting...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What math curriculum does Janney use?

Apparently Enron math if the parents think white students scoring in 60s is good, or as most Janney boosters say "best and only option in the city"....Ha! Watkins killed them!

Really? Janney boosters now? You are a sad human being, PP.

Nope. That title is reserved for the Janney parent on the other thread trash talking the fact that someone referred to Eaton, Hearst, Mann and Stoddert as fantastic schools. Some Janney parents are so cruel and continue to say Janney is the end all be all. It's quite humbling for them to be shown so low. If memory serves me correctly, they were middle to low in same drill down with DC CAS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What math curriculum does Janney use?

Apparently Enron math if the parents think white students scoring in 60s is good, or as most Janney boosters say "best and only option in the city"....Ha! Watkins killed them!

Really? Janney boosters now? You are a sad human being, PP.

Nope. That title is reserved for the Janney parent on the other thread trash talking the fact that someone referred to Eaton, Hearst, Mann and Stoddert as fantastic schools. Some Janney parents are so cruel and continue to say Janney is the end all be all. It's quite humbling for them to be shown so low. If memory serves me correctly, they were middle to low in same drill down with DC CAS.

People, you are pathetic.