PARCC Scores for Grades 3-8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aggregate for WOTP
Janney ES 74%
Ross ES 73%
Lafayette ES 72%
Mann ES 71%
Eaton ES 69%
Murch ES 68%
Key ES 65%
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 52%
Hearst ES 42%

The bolded are the only two that are significantly off.

I am curious about Oyster's results? Is it lower because they are counting the results in middle school?

Could you indicate where to get the results by grade and by school? So we could compare third graders across schools. I can't find it. Thanks

Yes, they are counting middle school years too, so it's a bit of an apples vs oranges comparison. Hopefully we'll see the grade-by-grade results soon, I am really curios.

(Also, it is worth remembering that Oyster students learn math in Spanish, yet they are obviously tested in English. What would happen if Janney students got tested in Spanish?)

Grade by grade came out last Monday. Nothing holding you back from satisfying your curiousity tonight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else take notice of Ludlow Taylor's scores relative to last year's miraculous improvement on DCCASS? Things that make you go hmmmmmmmm.........................

CAS scores at LT were among the highest in the hill for years, so no really a " dramatic" improvement. Mystery is why the significant drop on PARC scores. First year with PARC , so we'll see if it continues or improves, as I suspect it will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aggregate for WOTP
Janney ES 74%
Ross ES 73%
Lafayette ES 72%
Mann ES 71%
Eaton ES 69%
Murch ES 68%
Key ES 65%
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 52%
Hearst ES 42%

The bolded are the only two that are significantly off.

I am curious about Oyster's results? Is it lower because they are counting the results in middle school?

Could you indicate where to get the results by grade and by school? So we could compare third graders across schools. I can't find it. Thanks

Yes, they are counting middle school years too, so it's a bit of an apples vs oranges comparison. Hopefully we'll see the grade-by-grade results soon, I am really curios.

(Also, it is worth remembering that Oyster students learn math in Spanish, yet they are obviously tested in English. What would happen if Janney students got tested in Spanish?)

Grade by grade came out last Monday. Nothing holding you back from satisfying your curiousity tonight.

Still, numbers are numbers. No one gave the Oyster kids an oral exam in math. O-A's scores were very low.

[Anonymous]

Can anyone give a link to the grade by grade analysis?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone give a link to the grade by grade analysis?

http://results.osse.dc.gov

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aggregate for WOTP
Janney ES 74%
Ross ES 73%
Lafayette ES 72%
Mann ES 71%
Eaton ES 69%
Murch ES 68%
Key ES 65%
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 52%
Hearst ES 42%

The bolded are the only two that are significantly off.

I am curious about Oyster's results? Is it lower because they are counting the results in middle school?

Could you indicate where to get the results by grade and by school? So we could compare third graders across schools. I can't find it. Thanks

Yes, they are counting middle school years too, so it's a bit of an apples vs oranges comparison. Hopefully we'll see the grade-by-grade results soon, I am really curios.

(Also, it is worth remembering that Oyster students learn math in Spanish, yet they are obviously tested in English. What would happen if Janney students got tested in Spanish?)

Grade by grade came out last Monday. Nothing holding you back from satisfying your curiousity tonight.

Still, numbers are numbers. No one gave the Oyster kids an oral exam in math. O-A's scores were very low.

Thank you to the PP who shared the link http://results.osse.dc.gov

Got curious about this last point about math scores at O-A, and this is what I found.

Level 4 + 5 at Math for 5th grade--which is probably the most meaningful comparison between two elementaries:

At O-A:
-- All students: 67%
-- White only: 84%

At Janney:
-- All students: 72%
-- White only: 69%

I didn't see a way to search for Level 5 only ("Exceeded Expectations"), and I suspect Janney would do better there. Still, this shows O-A students are doing pretty well in math. Despite the fact they learn the subject in Spanish.

[Anonymous]

Learning it in Spanish should not affect the scores at all. Generally it seemed like oyster did not do well overall. That is a shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Learning it in Spanish should not affect the scores at all. Generally it seemed like oyster did not do well overall. That is a shame.

Lady, you seem to be pretty slow at math AND reading. Congrats!

Now if you leave us alone, OR do some useful research following the link just provided, that'd be great!

[Anonymous]

Oh God. And the OA parents are starting to attack people again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aggregate for WOTP
Janney ES 74%
Ross ES 73%
Lafayette ES 72%
Mann ES 71%
Eaton ES 69%
Murch ES 68%
Key ES 65%
Oyster Adams Bilingual School 52%
Hearst ES 42%

The bolded are the only two that are significantly off.

I am curious about Oyster's results? Is it lower because they are counting the results in middle school?

Could you indicate where to get the results by grade and by school? So we could compare third graders across schools. I can't find it. Thanks

Yes, they are counting middle school years too, so it's a bit of an apples vs oranges comparison. Hopefully we'll see the grade-by-grade results soon, I am really curios.

(Also, it is worth remembering that Oyster students learn math in Spanish, yet they are obviously tested in English. What would happen if Janney students got tested in Spanish?)

Grade by grade came out last Monday. Nothing holding you back from satisfying your curiousity tonight.

Still, numbers are numbers. No one gave the Oyster kids an oral exam in math. O-A's scores were very low.

Thank you to the PP who shared the link http://results.osse.dc.gov

Got curious about this last point about math scores at O-A, and this is what I found.

Level 4 + 5 at Math for 5th grade--which is probably the most meaningful comparison between two elementaries:

At O-A:
-- All students: 67%
-- White only: 84%

At Janney:
-- All students: 72%
-- White only: 69%

I didn't see a way to search for Level 5 only ("Exceeded Expectations"), and I suspect Janney would do better there. Still, this shows O-A students are doing pretty well in math. Despite the fact they learn the subject in Spanish.

Some recent posters appear to have missed this inadvertly.

[Anonymous]

Learning Math in Spanish should have no effect whatsoever on their math scores. But whatever makes you feel good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Learning Math in Spanish should have no effect whatsoever on their math scores. But whatever makes you feel good.

But OA still did better than Janney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Learning Math in Spanish should have no effect whatsoever on their math scores. But whatever makes you feel good.

But OA still did better than Janney.

Noooooo.... Only the WHITE kids did. You failed the rest. Glad that you don't even consider them part of your school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else take notice of Ludlow Taylor's scores relative to last year's miraculous improvement on DCCASS? Things that make you go hmmmmmmmm.........................

CAS scores at LT were among the highest in the hill for years, so no really a " dramatic" improvement. Mystery is why the significant drop on PARC scores. First year with PARC , so we'll see if it continues or improves, as I suspect it will.

Didn't the composite scores increase by something like 17 percentage points between 2013 and 2014?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Learning Math in Spanish should have no effect whatsoever on their math scores. But whatever makes you feel good.

But OA still did better than Janney.

Noooooo.... Only the WHITE kids did. You failed the rest. Glad that you don't even consider them part of your school.

OA has 19% FARM, Janney has 2%. More than enough to make up for 5 point overall difference. VERY telling.

-Not an OA or any JKLM parent