PARCC Scores for Grades 3-8

[Anonymous]

Scores have been released.

http://dcps.dc.gov/release/dc-public-schools-parcc-scores-released-grades-3-8

Looks like Ross scored better than Lafayette.

[Anonymous]

Full results on OSSE website school by school here:

http://osse.dc.gov/node/1120842

[Anonymous]

Wow. There are some really low scores in there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow. There are some really low scores in there.

New, more accurate baseline. DC, along with many states also only counted L4 and L5 as acceptable. Some states ( Ohio for example) counted L3 as proficient too. I'm glad we kept our standards higher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Scores have been released.

http://dcps.dc.gov/release/dc-public-schools-parcc-scores-released-grades-3-8

Looks like Ross scored better than Lafayette.

by 2 percentage points in math and the same scores in English. Both are excellent schools. Why would this surprise you? Looks like all the JKLMEOR schools did pretty well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. There are some really low scores in there.

New, more accurate baseline. DC, along with many states also only counted L4 and L5 as acceptable. Some states ( Ohio for example) counted L3 as proficient too. I'm glad we kept our standards higher.

Agreed.

[Anonymous]

What happened to Key and Murch? Whew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. There are some really low scores in there.

New, more accurate baseline. DC, along with many states also only counted L4 and L5 as acceptable. Some states ( Ohio for example) counted L3 as proficient too. I'm glad we kept our standards higher.

Oh I agree but it is still sad how low some schools are. We're talking single digits.

[Anonymous]

Deal 44% in math and 68% in English

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Deal 44% in math and 68% in English

Sticking with middle schools

Washington Latin -- 44% in Math; 65% in English

DCI -- 31% in math; 33% in English.

BASIS 59% in math and 52% in English.

[Anonymous]

Looks like YY takes the cake for charters! Good job. Similar scores to WOTP. Sad that 60% is then new 80%
Charters:
YY Math 60%/Eng 62% Aggregate 61%
LAMB Math 39%/ English 53% Aggregate 46%
ITS Math 35%/Eng 42% Aggregate 39%
Two Rivers Math 36%/Eng 41% Aggregate 39%
MV Math 40%/Eng 30% Aggregate 35%
Stokes Math 30%/Eng 38% Aggregate 34%
CMI Math 27%/Eng 39% Aggregate 33%

[Anonymous]

I think it's also important when looking at the scores to see how many valid tests were taken. Some of these schools only had 20 valid tests.

[Anonymous]

Upset that the new threshold for subgroups is now 25 kids. It was 10 last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like YY takes the cake for charters! Good job. Similar scores to WOTP. Sad that 60% is then new 80%
Charters:
YY Math 60%/Eng 62% Aggregate 61%
LAMB Math 39%/ English 53% Aggregate 46%
ITS Math 35%/Eng 42% Aggregate 39%
Two Rivers Math 36%/Eng 41% Aggregate 39%
MV Math 40%/Eng 30% Aggregate 35%
Stokes Math 30%/Eng 38% Aggregate 34%
CMI Math 27%/Eng 39% Aggregate 33%

How oddly competitive of you.

Also, check out the number of tests valid - I think schools like ITS, CMI and MV only had 1 or 2 testing classes this year.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, the 25-kid threshold does not promote transparency in the reporting.

It's also important to note how many grades/kids comprise the testing population, especially for the charters. At MV, it's only 3rd grade. At YY, it's 3rd-5th. At ITS, it's 3rd-6th. Not sure if the Two Rivers stats include all of the middle school kids, but I bet they do. Etc.