Pamela Geller is nuts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

They built a Jewish settlement on the site of the Deir Yassin massacre.

Not really a nice thing to do, is it? But yet you are willing to accept the same because....Muslim?

Uh, the people building that mosque did not bomb WTC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

They built a Jewish settlement on the site of the Deir Yassin massacre.

You might want to learn the other side of that story here:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths3/MFrefugees.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

They built a Jewish settlement on the site of the Deir Yassin massacre.

Not really a nice thing to do, is it? But yet you are willing to accept the same because....Muslim?

Uh, the people building that mosque did not bomb WTC.

Uh, but they are not real sensitive about the fact that it happened, now are they?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There is no letter?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intifada

Thank you, but I already knew the definition of "intifada".

There is no threatening letter.

According to YOU. According to others, it was threatening. Why on earth do you feel that because YOU see something one way, that it's the truth? You cannot possibly be that vain!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

Would that be on Palestinian land or Israeli land? In any case, it seems pointless to discuss the First Amendment in a country that does not have the First Amendment.

I deplore this Draw Muhammad contest, but I acknowledge its right to go on as free speech, stupid as I think it is. If she had been blocked and the ACLU took up her case, I would write yet another check to support them.

Pam Geller refuses to accept the right of people to create public schools that teach Arabic or to build a mosque clearly under their First Amendment rights. This reveals the fact that she is lying when she says she opposes only Jihadis. She opposes Islam and everything associated with it, regardless of content.

Moreover on the First Amendment, she is a hypocrite of the first order.

The question is, are you? Are you a hypocrite, or can you see that freedoms apply even when you disagree with the persons exercising them?

So what you are saying is that a Christian school doesn't violate first Amendment rights? Or teaching about Christianity in the publics? ACES!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There is no letter?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intifada

Thank you, but I already knew the definition of "intifada".

There is no threatening letter.

According to YOU. According to others, it was threatening. Why on earth do you feel that because YOU see something one way, that it's the truth? You cannot possibly be that vain!

Oh so it's OK to block an Arabic language school. FYI the school's current director is a Jew.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There is no letter?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intifada

Thank you, but I already knew the definition of "intifada".

There is no threatening letter.

According to YOU. According to others, it was threatening. Why on earth do you feel that because YOU see something one way, that it's the truth? You cannot possibly be that vain!

There is an easy way to solve this dilemma: link to the letter and quote the threatening part. The recipient of the letter did not find it threatening. Why would you care about whether or not a bunch of Islamophobes who hate Muslims are claiming it is threatening? The letter didn't even involve them

[Muslima]

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

If you meant Israel, check. Not only do they build but they they also steal your land to build whatever they want on it , Geez , who knew?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you attack and don't back up your point, you lose your message and tell me that I've uncovered something that you'd rather not be brought to the attention of others.

You have got it wrong. You made the allegations. It is up to you to prove them. If you want to demonstrate that the accusations are in fact true, you need to provide evidence that they are true. It is not up to me to prove negatives. This is the second time today that you have made unequivocal accusations and, when challenged, expected me to find evidence rather than you supporting your accusations. That's not how things work. Particularly when one of your allegations -- that Obama is planning to federalize the local police -- is so outlandish.

And I already did. I brought my opinion to the table in the form of an article with a link to a Federal document. You clearly don't want to accept that document as something Obama has put forth, nor it seems do you want to see it as Federal at all. In fact, that document does not even EXIST to you, because otherwise, you would be willing to tell me why it needs to exist, i.e. why the Federal Government under Obama needs to re-educate the state and local police departments.

I know - GELLER WROTE THE FEDERAL DOCUMENT! She forged it in order to discredit the first black president! What a RACIST

[Anonymous]

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

If you meant Israel, check. Not only do they build but they they also steal your land to build whatever they want on it , Geez , who knew?

And that's not ok, right? But if Muslims do it? Well, shit, you have every right to!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

Freedom Tower is not just a tribute. It's a gigantic office building.

And are you aware that a lot more Muslims died in the World Trade Center towers than just the eight terrorists?

So what? That makes building a 'Muslim cultural center' there OK?

[Anonymous]

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DNA of victims was found on the Freedom Tower site, yet the Freedom Tower was allowed to be built.

It's a tribute. Not a 'cultural center' reflecting the very religion who's zealots murdered those victims.

I guess we shouldn't have any Christian, Jewish, or Atheist cultural center anywhere in this country

How about the Jews build a temple right alongside a site where Palestinians are massacred. You'd welcome that I'm sure ... something tells me you'd be screaming 'occupation'

If you meant Israel, check. Not only do they build but they they also steal your land to build whatever they want on it , Geez , who knew?

And again, why are you here? Why did you or your family come to America? Are you actually in America or are you writing from outside the country?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you attack and don't back up your point, you lose your message and tell me that I've uncovered something that you'd rather not be brought to the attention of others.

You have got it wrong. You made the allegations. It is up to you to prove them. If you want to demonstrate that the accusations are in fact true, you need to provide evidence that they are true. It is not up to me to prove negatives. This is the second time today that you have made unequivocal accusations and, when challenged, expected me to find evidence rather than you supporting your accusations. That's not how things work. Particularly when one of your allegations -- that Obama is planning to federalize the local police -- is so outlandish.

And I already did. I brought my opinion to the table in the form of an article with a link to a Federal document. You clearly don't want to accept that document as something Obama has put forth, nor it seems do you want to see it as Federal at all. In fact, that document does not even EXIST to you, because otherwise, you would be willing to tell me why it needs to exist, i.e. why the Federal Government under Obama needs to re-educate the state and local police departments.

I know - GELLER WROTE THE FEDERAL DOCUMENT! She forged it in order to discredit the first black president! What a RACIST

You are doing nothing to suggest that you are in fact not a crazed conspiracy theorist who believes Obama is going to federalize the local police force. I linked to the document myself (you didn't actually link to it). Since I could not find Obama's plans to federalize the local police in that document, I asked you to show me the part that I must have missed. You have refused.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There is no letter?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intifada

Thank you, but I already knew the definition of "intifada".

There is no threatening letter.

According to YOU. According to others, it was threatening. Why on earth do you feel that because YOU see something one way, that it's the truth? You cannot possibly be that vain!

There is an easy way to solve this dilemma: link to the letter and quote the threatening part. The recipient of the letter did not find it threatening. Why would you care about whether or not a bunch of Islamophobes who hate Muslims are claiming it is threatening? The letter didn't even involve them

The part where he wrote about what's happened before when people have drawn Mohammed. Quite the warning. So in other words, back down or risk being attacked. And we, as Americans, are supposed to ...what....back down right? Because....racism....for drawing an image. I mean, who can blame them for attacking. We DREW THEIR PROPHET.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
The part where he wrote about what's happened before when people have drawn Mohammed. Quite the warning. So in other words, back down or risk being attacked. And we, as Americans, are supposed to ...what....back down right? Because....racism....for drawing an image. I mean, who can blame them for attacking. We DREW THEIR PROPHET.

A member of the NYPD stated a public safety concern and you consider it a threat? As I said, the recipient of the letter did not find it threatening. Why would you?