I wish my job only required me to work 195 days a year. I’d even take a pay cut to have it be so. But alas I am expected to be there throughout the year and yes many a night I’m up until 1 to 2 am putting in “unpaid” extra hours, and sometimes even weekends, This is necessary so that I can eat, spend time with and and make dinner for my family. When I was younger and paid much less, with 2 weeks vacation, plus 8 holidays off a year. I ran the numbers and realized that hour for hour I’d make much more money teaching, with summers off, shorter work days, and school breaks. Now throw in pensions, no work travel, heath care that was much cheaper comparatively and I was looking at a total boondoggle. After thought and investigation I realized teaching wouldn’t be best for my introverted personality. I laugh whenever I hear teachers grumble about the money. How much exactly to you expect to be paid for as you stated a 195 day a year contract job, especially when only 180 of those day are spent in the actual classroom teaching. |
This does sound like an insane amount of work for a job that pays government level salaries. But I don’t think it has always been like this. So what changed to make the hours so crazy? |
It’s funny how you wrote a lengthy post to bash teachers and in the same breath admit that it’s not something you could do yourself. Yes, it’s a very demanding job in an overstimulating environment with no downtime. I tend to value people who are able to do something that I am unable to do myself. |
|
They aren’t underpaid. They get paid a more than fair wage for the hours worked.
The education required for the work performed fits the salary. The total compensation package, including insurance and retirement benefits is actually quite generous if you take all of the above into consideration. Is that less funny? Are you clear as to what it means to bash? Do you need bullet points? Or would that still be too much for your skill set, comprehension abilities and attention span? Fyi yes I just bashed you, so are you now clear as to what it means to bash and or trash. I freely admit in this instance to both. |
Again, another topic that has been discussed endlessly on this forum. There are additional meetings, paperwork, data collection, trainings, duties, etc., that I’ve been added in the past 20 years. |
Yeah, this. And both political parties and every leader seems eager to add to it. I wonder what would happen if some candidate for SB ran on "restore 1990s workloads to teachers." As a parent I'd be thrilled. |
I’d say 70 hours is believable, but very atypical. The hours seem to fall more heavily on those teaching secondary language arts. We are a two teacher family (ES and secondary) and we’re probably in the 50-55 hour range. It’s a drop in the bucket, but 4.5 hours a week of CT a week seems high. 2+ hours a day lesson planning seems high too if they are in CT meetings up to 4.5 hours a week. |
Others of us were working at 5 this morning too, without having the luxury of time to post on DCUM to attention-seek about it. Here’s the difference, when the rest of the 5am crowd finishes their work, they will have to do the parts of your job— that is, teaching basic and critical skills— which you admit elsewhere require repetition, which kids don’t get with all these teacher work days. Then, they will have to figure out where to send their kids on the next early release if they don’t think four hours of laptop time is sufficient. So YOU can have a lighter workload. Until you want to come to my office and do a few hours of my work every day to make sure I am not overtaxed, do not expect me to be excited to do yours. |
You don’t seem to value the working parents of your students very much. Is it because you think you can do all of their jobs? |
Thank you for supporting teachers. This site loves to trash them, not to find any value or worth in their roles. It’s refreshing to see a post that isn’t an attack. Just… thank you. Thank you for seeing what we do when others don’t. |
I’m not a teacher and not sure how that was your takeaway from my post since I mentioned nothing about the value that I place on other jobs. But you just seem to be looking for an argument. |
All this tells me is you know how to use ChatGPT. |
+100. The notion that they are underpaid, unappreciated is a myth. Competition for jobs brings down wages (Econ 101) and they do get generous leave and benefits. If the wages are too low, there will not be enough staff. Wages will go up accordingly. It's that simple. |
| Separation of church and state! |
DP. I guess you see it differently if you are in the profession. Sure, we have staffed classrooms. The problem is it’s an ever-revolving door of people because teachers quit. If your goal is to have “enough staff,” then I guess you can say we’re fine. If your goal is to have “effective, qualified teachers,” then we aren’t. Generous wages and benefits get people to try the profession, but the overwhelming demands of the job make them quit. And so the cycle repeats itself and DCUM posters continue to rage about unanswered emails, long-term subs, ungraded papers, and uninspired lessons. |