Project 2025 if Trump were to win

[Anonymous]

They couldn’t be clearer if they tried.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Just like to point out that this *highly critical of Trump* article is from the WSJ. It's a LWNJ myth that the WSJ is pro-Trump. They are not.

Assuming that the print picture is exactly what is written, that’s not remotely critical of Trump. That is a list of horrifying things that is presented as neutrally as if those are all normal things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Just like to point out that this *highly critical of Trump* article is from the WSJ. It's a LWNJ myth that the WSJ is pro-Trump. They are not.

Assuming that the print picture is exactly what is written, that’s not remotely critical of Trump. That is a list of horrifying things that is presented as neutrally as if those are all normal things.

They present the facts, we digest them and form the criticism. It's not their job to do the thinking for us, except on the editorial page.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Just like to point out that this *highly critical of Trump* article is from the WSJ. It's a LWNJ myth that the WSJ is pro-Trump. They are not.

They were pro-Trump enough from 2012 to 2021 to convince traditional conservatives to support him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Just like to point out that this *highly critical of Trump* article is from the WSJ. It's a LWNJ myth that the WSJ is pro-Trump. They are not.

Assuming that the print picture is exactly what is written, that’s not remotely critical of Trump. That is a list of horrifying things that is presented as neutrally as if those are all normal things.

They present the facts, we digest them and form the criticism. It's not their job to do the thinking for us, except on the editorial page.

And the editorial page is wildly pro-Trump.

[Anonymous]

For most politicians in the US, the answer is, "no, of course not"

It shouldn't be hard...and yet...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

For most politicians in the US, the answer is, "no, of course not"

It shouldn't be hard...and yet...

Cue “Independent” voters “hurr durr durr it’s not realistic you guys always make such a big deal out of this stuff.”

[Anonymous]

Just out there praising murderers

[Anonymous]

Kash Patel says as Trump’s next CIA Director he will lead “patriots” appointed by Trump in an all-out effort to prosecute and jail people in government and the media

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kash Patel says as Trump’s next CIA Director he will lead “patriots” appointed by Trump in an all-out effort to prosecute and jail people in government and the media

Anyone who doesn’t believe this is a blooming moron. I enjoy criticizing the media for its gross pro-GOP behavior, but I don’t demonize them. Trump demonized the media throughout his four years of torturing us all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kash Patel says as Trump’s next CIA Director he will lead “patriots” appointed by Trump in an all-out effort to prosecute and jail people in government and the media

Patel, Stephen Miller, Jeffrey Clark, Josh Hawley. They all look like the bullied kid in high school who wants to get back at everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They couldn’t be clearer if they tried.

A monster.

[Anonymous]

Bannon = most punchable face in America

[Anonymous]

hmmmm, yes

[Anonymous]

waiting game now to see what happens next with repubs