"Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
I'm wondering how many times you've repeated exactly the same words. As for your last sentence, right back atcha. |
Anonymous
Sorry, sending something back to the states to decide because it's not covered in the Constitution is hardly "rubber stamping" anything... but do go on. |
the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.
Anonymous
It does. Especially when every right wing hack lied about what they’d do. “Settled law,” they said. “Respecting precedent,” they said. They lied, POSs cover for them now. |
Anonymous
Please provide the exact quotes and citations to support this contention. |
Anonymous
Your "nope" is meaningless in the face of the reality of what this SCOTUS is doing. This SCOTUS is BS; just there to be activist judges for the GOP. They are stomping all over precedent in order to rubberstamp the awful policies of the GOP. Every accusation is a confession. |
Anonymous
|
Here it is. Read it and cheer or read it and weep. Calls for DOJ to investigate whether BK knowingly committed perjury.
https://l.smartnews.com/PtGtY/VRGFsI |
Anonymous
Oh, the irony. You really have zero self-awareness. |
Anonymous
Not about to download some app just so I can have the delight of reading far-left "Raw Story." LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate Raw Story Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to half-true, false, and unproven claims, as well as the promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/#:~:text=Overall%2C%20we%20rate%20Raw%20Story%20Left%20Biased%20based,as%20a%20liberal%20alternative%20to%20the%20Drudge%20Report. |
Anonymous
An activist right-wing Supreme Court would declare the unborn to be deserving of 14th amendment rights and require states to ban abortion. |
Anonymous
That says more about you, frankly. I've known a million Brett Kavanaughs and they always get away with their BS. As for him, he should have been DQ's on the basis of his lack of temperment for the job and his throwing out conspiracy theories. He exhibited no proper judicial disposition and bias. That should have nixed him from the get go. How many of us can cry, declare a love of beer, and throw around accusations of political conspiracy in a job interview and expect to get it? He lied. He's a liar. And he is unfit for the position by virtue of his own actions during the confirmation. |
Anonymous
This. They are trampling every norm and all well-settled precedent (Roe was confirmed several times over, even by Republicans). They are shi--ing on the institution and the constitution. They are not longer a respected or legitimate institution. Period. Every one of those GOP appointed justices said that Roe was settled, because it was. Then they tossed it at the first opportunity. They lied. They perjured themselves. |
Anonymous
|
To these accusations: “1. Kananaugh had other alleged victims. 2. His team knew about these allegations and poisoned the media landscape with narratives undermining his accusers.” one can only say “duh.” There were very deep pockets pushing Brett. He’d been their good little foot soldier and was being rewarded with a higher rank. It didn’t really matter what he did. As a nation we weren’t even given the favor of a real investigation. |
Anonymous
You are clearly lying about Ford and are making stuff up about your supposed credentials and relevance. All the signs are showing. It's obvious. |
Anonymous
+1000 |