"Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all realize that this thread is about the new documentary? It's not about Ford's testimony. It's about other unexplored allegations.

It’s a hit piece, plain and simple.

Or it may be that there are unexplored and unexplained facts behind Kavanaugh and his appointment (much less the sudden and unplanned Kennedy retirement)

Who paid off Kavanugh's loans?

His finances were addressed at the closed hearing with Senators.
You will take note that none of the Democratic Senators are questioning this. They were clearly satisfied with the answers to questions they asked.

Were his finances addresed though?

Do you have a credible citation for this?

And what about Kennedy's sudden and unexpected retirement?

There are still far too many unanswered questions and a complete lack of transparency that the American people deserve.

Transparency? Nobody cares about this nonsense you are rambling on about. It speaks volumes about your life if you are obsessed about a political issue that you have zero power to change. I mean, what are you trying to accomplish?

I hope this was parody... Either that or you ought to pause and reflect on the authoritarian values you embrace.

Oh, the irony!
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

NOT ONE THING KAVANAUGH SAID or "should have said" would have satisfied any of you rabid liberals.
Try being falsely accused of gang rape - very publicly - and then calmly respond to ridiculous questions.
And, he lied about NOTHING.

You folks need to just get over your Kavanaugh fetish and resign yourselves to the fact that he is on the Supreme Court and will remain there for a very long time.
Even though there are some among your ranks that have considered assassinating him.

And here we have a real example of what it is to be unhinged. Or maybe BK found the thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh and his wife are gross.
https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2020/10/brett-kavanaugh-caught-lying-in-scotus-opinion-against-voting-access-during-the-pandemic-report/

Once a liar always a liar.

Now this is hilarious. You think this honest mistake is some kind of "gotcha"? And your "source" is off-the-charts extreme left-wing. I wouldn't have expected anything less.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-new-civil-rights-movement/

LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Overall, we rate The New Civil Rights Movement far-Left Biased based on the use of loaded emotional language and editorial positions that favor the progressive left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources as well as a few failed fact checks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does this movie talk about Swetnick's accusations against Kavanaugh?

I certainly hope so. It better talk about the gross fake claims made against him - but that would be balanced reporting, so I doubt they will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all realize that this thread is about the new documentary? It's not about Ford's testimony. It's about other unexplored allegations.

It’s a hit piece, plain and simple.

Or it may be that there are unexplored and unexplained facts behind Kavanaugh and his appointment (much less the sudden and unplanned Kennedy retirement)

Who paid off Kavanugh's loans?

His finances were addressed at the closed hearing with Senators.
You will take note that none of the Democratic Senators are questioning this. They were clearly satisfied with the answers to questions they asked.

+1
And justices are not required to disclose gifts from family on federal judicial disclosure forms. He did nothing wrong here, but liberals simply loooooove to disregard facts.

+2

Loonies Gone Wild

+3
Understatement of the decade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.

And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.

Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.

We have a great SCOTUS in place.

+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.

Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.

It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.

We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My visceral reaction to Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony was that he reacted the way abusive men react when caught in a lie. Other women and men with experience with abusive men—both survivors and those who assist survivors of abuse had the same reaction that I did. You could see his wife’s reaction—she seemed afriad of the rage.

My visceral reaction to Ford’s testimony was that she reacted the way lying people react when caught in a lie. Other women and men with experience with lying people—both survivors and those who assist survivors of abuse had the same reaction that I did. You could see the reaction by the woman asking her questions—she couldn't believe how obviously Ford was making up lie after lie with no corroborating evidence of any kind.

She was very credible. Very.

DP. No, she actually wasn't. Especially with the lies about her "fear of flying," and the reason for the extra door on their house, in addition to the utter lack of details, dates, place, or substantiation by people who were supposedly there. Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all realize that this thread is about the new documentary? It's not about Ford's testimony. It's about other unexplored allegations.

It’s a hit piece, plain and simple.

Or it may be that there are unexplored and unexplained facts behind Kavanaugh and his appointment (much less the sudden and unplanned Kennedy retirement)

Who paid off Kavanugh's loans?

His finances were addressed at the closed hearing with Senators.
You will take note that none of the Democratic Senators are questioning this. They were clearly satisfied with the answers to questions they asked.

+1
And justices are not required to disclose gifts from family on federal judicial disclosure forms. He did nothing wrong here, but liberals simply loooooove to disregard facts.

+2

Loonies Gone Wild

+3
Understatement of the decade.

Ha ha ha. GOP supporters talking about facts. Like you'd know one if you fell over it. Calling others "loons"

Look in the mirror, sheeple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.

Cute.

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.

+1

She looked insane and hysterical while testifying. Supposedly she is doctor? No way in hell she is a real doctor. It's unbelievable that some people who claim to be critical thinkers believed her. I've come to the conclusion that anyone who is ideological is incapable of being objective.

Well then you just proved yourself incapable of being objective (or honest).

DP. Right, and those of you condemning Kavanaugh are SO very objective and honest - deriding him for his fury during the hearing and claiming *that* means he's guilty? Do you have any self-awareness at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

NOT ONE THING KAVANAUGH SAID or "should have said" would have satisfied any of you rabid liberals.
Try being falsely accused of gang rape - very publicly - and then calmly respond to ridiculous questions.
And, he lied about NOTHING.

You folks need to just get over your Kavanaugh fetish and resign yourselves to the fact that he is on the Supreme Court and will remain there for a very long time.
Even though there are some among your ranks that have considered assassinating him.

And here we have a real example of what it is to be unhinged. Or maybe BK found the thread.

Unhinged? The PP is spot-on, in every way.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.

And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.

Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.

We have a great SCOTUS in place.

+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.

Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.

It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.

We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.

Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you all realize that this thread is about the new documentary? It's not about Ford's testimony. It's about other unexplored allegations.

It’s a hit piece, plain and simple.

Or it may be that there are unexplored and unexplained facts behind Kavanaugh and his appointment (much less the sudden and unplanned Kennedy retirement)

Who paid off Kavanugh's loans?

His finances were addressed at the closed hearing with Senators.
You will take note that none of the Democratic Senators are questioning this. They were clearly satisfied with the answers to questions they asked.

+1
And justices are not required to disclose gifts from family on federal judicial disclosure forms. He did nothing wrong here, but liberals simply loooooove to disregard facts.

+2

Loonies Gone Wild

+3
Understatement of the decade.

Ha ha ha. GOP supporters talking about facts. Like you'd know one if you fell over it. Calling others "loons"

Look in the mirror, sheeple.

Here's a bright one ^^. You have presented zero facts about Kavanaugh, just your usual sordid, garbage theories that you desperately wish were true. Your behavior is beyond pathetic.

[Anonymous]

This doc is factual, so what's the problem maga?

it's clear Kavanaugh should have been investigated. You seem to think he had nothing to hide so what's the issue? He'd come out clean according to you. Except that is not reality is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.

Cute.

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.

I’m very interested in what that relevant discipline is and what signs you saw.

Won't share the discipline but here is something that was a red flag to me and colleagues.

At some point Ford said that she had taken a lie detector test the very same day her grandma (or mother?) had died. The interviewer then interrupted to doublecheck if that was the case, because you should never take such a test in such an emotional moment, it screws the baseline and the results.

Ford realized that her previous testimony made no sense and improvised something like "Uh I'm not sure, might have been a day before or after the funeral"

Which makes even less sense. Attending your grandma's funeral is one of those moments you remember vividly, and if you took a lie detector test in some office that same day you'd remember it. And if you say it was that day you don't just make things up and then say it might have been a day before or later.

My brother died when I was 28. I went to his funeral and I do know the month but have no idea of the actual date.

You probably also think that Anita Hill lied

It's not about the actual date. You would remember if you did something else major the same day.

Exactly. Especially if it happened less than a year ago and you had spent weeks training your testimony with multiple lawyers (all helpfully provided by the Democratic Party).

Ford was an obvious fraud.

Even with her trained testimony she came off as being unhinged. She was a hot mess and had a crazed look in her eyes. Definitely not a credible witness to everyone except hard core dems.

Yes BK did come across as unhinged. Dod you see all those faces he made? Way too emotional and overly dramatic. Clearly staged. He is such a liar.

I'm going to accuse you of sexual assault. I expect you to remain calm and poised while I do so, televised in front of millions, even if you know you're innocent. Let's see how that goes.
DP

I can think of quite a few instances where similar situations happened where someone was accused, rightly, or wrongly, and did not become as unhinged over it as Kavanaugh did.

Really? Similar situation as in, was falsely accused and then had to immediately be televised while refuting said allegations? Do tell. Examples please.

Sociopaths are very good at keeping calm in situations such as this. They are practiced. Ted Bundy was able to sit on a rape hotline and discuss his own murders with a detective friend he met there.

Yes. Which is why Kavanaugh very clearly is no sociopath. He reacted the way any human being falsely accused would act. Upset.

He acted the way my ex did when I accused him of having an affair. How DARE I accuse him???

Of course, he was cheating the whole time.

Kavanaugh's anger could have been based more in "who the heck do you think you are to question ME, accuse ME, interefere in my appointment, publicly humiliate ME? And not in whether or not Ford's accusastions happened.

I remember Bill Clinton seemed pretty angry about being accused on ML. We all know how that turned out.

Sorry, but if you falsely accuse me of sexual assault (or anything), I'm going to be very upset and have no problem showing it. Especially if I have to defend myself in front of the entire world.

Kavanaugh's behavior was not that of a mature adult. Especially during what was a job interview. He demonstrated himself to be completely unfit to serve. It seems you would not be a candidate I'd want to hire, either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.

And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.

Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.

We have a great SCOTUS in place.

+1
And it's Democrats who would love for SCOTUS to act as their own personal legislature.

Perfect example of how every GOP accusation is a confession.

It is the GOP and its supporters who have put in place the most activist, most illegitimate Supreme Court.

We see right through you. And you don't like it. You want us all to be as gullible as your supporters.

Nope. Democrats would love nothing more than their own personal SCOTUS, used to rubberstamp liberal legislation. Hint: that's not the purpose of SCOTUS. It exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not - it does not make laws. And it certainly isn't a wing of the Democratic party. Sorry to disappoint.
DP

Oh that’s right only republicans get their group of personal SCOTUS to rubber stamp their radical policies.