By “documentation, do you mean their marketing mumbo jumbo. Remember, they chose not to subject their claims to the scrutiny of regulators (who certify most submersibles) |
Developmentally, they are considered adolescents by the American Academy of Pediatrics. |
Did you not see the text in which the CEO told a father who was concerned that it was as safe as crossing a street??!! |
Yes, their marketing mumbo jumbo, and yes, I'm well aware they didn't subject their claims to scrutiny, but that doesn't mean they didn't conduct their own internal tests to an extent that gave Rush enough confidence to trust it with his life, which he did. Here's an article from a trade publication about the sub when it was first launched, and these engineers didn't bat an eye at the hull health monitoring system or call its reliability into question. It's only after the implosion that everyone has become an expert at how terrible it is. https://www.compositesworld.com/news/oceangate-ceo-pilots-carbon-fiber-submersible-in-4000-m-solo-dive |
Nah, it's not unique to Americans. |
This has to be one of the most stupid comments in this thread. It applies to nothing. You are obsessed with winning an argument you are not capable of winning. |
He knew it was unsafe. He had too many $$$ riding on this. |
We know the bolded is not true. We know the submersible community was very concerned about it. Engineers did speak up. |
Maybe, but $$$ didn't stop him from calling off previous dives over safety concerns. |
Sorry, but the bolded is true. Where was the public concern raised? All we've seen are a couple strongly worded emails sent to him in private. By and large, other engineers stood by and did nothing, while publications reported on his deep dives in carbon fiber. Even Nargeolet, the Titanic veteran, jumped inside for a ride. |
He dismissed certifications that other deep sea submersibles attained by saying that his tech was so cutting edge, it made the certs obsolete. Some of his bravado might have been a marketing ploy - saying that he didn’t want to hire 60 yo white male engineers etc, but the recklessness behind them is pretty scary. Engineers are notoriously risk averse to the extreme. They don’t push the envelope and respect physics. But they do make mistakes, and it’s what Stockton rush did after his mistakes that guaranteed a catastrophe. The following article is a good example of a near catastrophic failure that was averted by an engineer with a conscience. And luck. https://www.uh.edu/ethicsinscience/Media/59Story.pdf |
An activity, which is not very safe around here. |
But they should definitely be allowed to vote right? |
Voting and riding what looked like a cramped Disney ride to your death are two different things.........How were they going to see out of the thing anyway? It had one hole/portal in the front. |
Exactly. The kid will do what Dad says in one case and what Dad says in the other case. |