UHC CEO Gunned Down in Midtown Manhattan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We know the front desk clerk had a conversation with this guy. Have the police mentioned any kind of accent? Foreign, southern etc?

I was thinking the same thing. It's strange that it hasn't been mentioned in news articles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I heard a breakdown of the CEO's $10 million dollar salary. He made $20 a minute. Compare that to someone making $20 an hour.

So? That doesn’t seem exorbitant to me. An extra few million is a drop in the bucket for their company and wouldn’t even be enough to cover the medical bankruptcy of more than a handful of people. I’ve never had UHC, but no one has to use them. It’s a free market. Get a different insurance/work somewhere else if you are so unhappy with your benefits. I’ve had three different medical insurers over the years and have never had any major problems getting treated or having them pay what they are contracted to pay in my plan.

You typically do not find out the specifics of health plans and their costs until actually hired and going through it all with HR. I wouldn't call this a fully free market when health insurance is tied to employment. You make it sound like finding a job + a job with great healthcare is as easy as 1, 2, 3...It's not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know the front desk clerk had a conversation with this guy. Have the police mentioned any kind of accent? Foreign, southern etc?

I was thinking the same thing. It's strange that it hasn't been mentioned in news articles.

The police might be holding this information back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

I agree--I think it is the same guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

With all these photos, someone has recognized him by this point. Even if the police or FBI don't want to release his name, surely it would have been mentioned in social media?

The photos they are so prominently showing now aren't him. This is another strange, inside job, and we'll never know who did it or why.

So your theory is that the real killer sent another guy around to pretend he was the killer to act as a decoy?

No. Whoever hired the killer has created a decoy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

And the Starbucks photo has been removed from every place that ever ran it. Very troubling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

This is silly. There’s no chance it’s not the same guy, however different a couple of the photos look due to differences in lighting and angles. The police have been very clear on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

The eyebrows have me stumped. In the taxi and just outside the taxi they are very dark and shaped. In other photos they are blurred and less sculpted. But the images of eyebrows also are less clear on and more hidden by hood, so I don’t know. But they look different enough that it gives me doubt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

And the Starbucks photo has been removed from every place that ever ran it. Very troubling.

Starbucks guy has a different jacket on: not the same flaps on the hood. The pic from the hotel has a string at the hood and the Starbucks one doesn't. So I guess they maybe got the wrong guy's DNA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

I still think it looks like the same person with different lighting. You can’t see his eyebrows in the original picture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I heard a breakdown of the CEO's $10 million dollar salary. He made $20 a minute. Compare that to someone making $20 an hour.

So? That doesn’t seem exorbitant to me. An extra few million is a drop in the bucket for their company and wouldn’t even be enough to cover the medical bankruptcy of more than a handful of people. I’ve never had UHC, but no one has to use them. It’s a free market. Get a different insurance/work somewhere else if you are so unhappy with your benefits. I’ve had three different medical insurers over the years and have never had any major problems getting treated or having them pay what they are contracted to pay in my plan.

1) I’m afraid your experience is far from universal.

2) Do you honestly think people suffering would not just “get a different insurance/work somewhere else” if that was an option for them? Especially after they’ve gotten very sick and their insurance has decided making them not die is not medically necessary? Why don’t you tell them to just eat cake Marie

Can you provide us an actual example of someone being denied standard care? Not experimental care. What is the DX and what is the care being denied? Otherwise you are trafficking hyperbole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

And the Starbucks photo has been removed from every place that ever ran it. Very troubling.

Starbucks guy has a different jacket on: not the same flaps on the hood. The pic from the hotel has a string at the hood and the Starbucks one doesn't. So I guess they maybe got the wrong guy's DNA?

This person is benefiting from the fact that there is probably 100 white guys in black pants and a black puffer jacket at any given moment in New York

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy is really brazen. Looking right at the camera in the cab. Leaving the monopoly money. I suspect that leaving the starbucks stuff behind was intentional. Maybe he's not a professional, but he is really good and he is trolling them big-time.

I was thinking this morning that it seems strange to me that the original photo of the suspect taken in Starbucks, which does not look like the guy in these subsequent photos at all, but is much more likely to be the suspect, no longer appears anywhere. Does anybody else find it strange? I do not believe the taxi photos--or even the hostel photos-are actually the suspect.

Yup, was thinking same. He could have been the “random” roommate in the hostel, who cleared all this guys stuff out just after he left. Team effort.

Am I the only one who thinks it looks like the same guy? It’s different lighting and different angles which accounts for some of the differences.

The taxi picture he’s clearly wearing a completely different jacket, but I don’t see how this surprises anyone. The guy has different jackets, he took great care to plan this out which accounts for the different wardrobe.

It's not the clothes that are the issue. It's the eyes, eyebrows, skin color. They are not the same person.

And the Starbucks photo has been removed from every place that ever ran it. Very troubling.

Go back to QAnon! The picture is up everywhere. I just pulled this from the New York Police Department site.

https://x.com/nypdnews/status/1864396142819078324?s=46&t=R3AX3c486LFdeZpFtkN_eA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just don't think anyone is going to turn this guy in.

They need to up the reward to 1 million.

Who would put up that kind of money?

UHC? Yeah, that'll look great for them.

NYPD? Also an awful look, compared to other rewards for other unsolved crimes.

No one wins by catching this guy or offering up a hefty reward.

The guys salary was 10 million last year. Ten percent is easily doable, but only if his family cares. They obviously don’t. 10,000 is what a family making 100K could scrounge up as a reward. This is just embarrassing.

You’re not very bright, are you? It’s not embarrassing. It’s smart PR. people are already upset about his salary etc. Putting up a huge reward would be a bad look