Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The right wing excuses and non-answers in this thread really demonstrate the damage that right wing propaganda is doing to this country. Republicans legitimately seem confused about basic civics stuff, and that would be okay (we all forget some of that stuff) if they didn’t believe conspiracy theories instead of searching out the actual answers.


Republicans:

Here's a simple test for figuring out when you are being manipulated by your so-called "media" sources:

If you change "Trump" to "Hillary" or "Obama" in any headline, does your feeling about the topic at hand immediately change to the exact opposite?

"Trump kept classified documents in boxes in his basement." EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE!

"Hillary kept classified documents on a server in her basement." LOCK HER UP!



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump is telling his lawyers: Get "my" top secret documents back. LOL

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tells-lawyers-get-my-top-secrets-documents-back-1234580501/



Why?? Couldn't he just make copies?


Jesus lord we all better pray that there aren’t copies
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump is telling his lawyers: Get "my" top secret documents back. LOL

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tells-lawyers-get-my-top-secrets-documents-back-1234580501/



Why?? Couldn't he just make copies?


Please tell me this is a joke. If not, you will find me weeping quietly for our country in a corner.
Anonymous
👀
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The right wing excuses and non-answers in this thread really demonstrate the damage that right wing propaganda is doing to this country. Republicans legitimately seem confused about basic civics stuff, and that would be okay (we all forget some of that stuff) if they didn’t believe conspiracy theories instead of searching out the actual answers.


Republicans:

Here's a simple test for figuring out when you are being manipulated by your so-called "media" sources:

If you change "Trump" to "Hillary" or "Obama" in any headline, does your feeling about the topic at hand immediately change to the exact opposite?

"Trump kept classified documents in boxes in his basement." EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE!

"Hillary kept classified documents on a server in her basement." LOCK HER UP!





By law, Hillary can’t declassify documents
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump is telling his lawyers: Get "my" top secret documents back. LOL

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tells-lawyers-get-my-top-secrets-documents-back-1234580501/



Why?? Couldn't he just make copies?


Jesus lord we all better pray that there aren’t copies


He probably did keep a copy of the declassified documents about Russiagate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go


Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.


The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.



Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?


The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.


“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

That was months and months before the search and after NARA’s criminal referral to the DOJ. What is this from? Why is “acting” in quotes?


Nara’s letter stated specifically that WH counsel was involved, and the lawyer stated that he spoke to Biden about waiving privilege. Biden might have not know what date the raid was going down, but he knew it was going down. Where else have we heard the line ‘we heard about it through media the day the American people did”? Obama era
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The right wing excuses and non-answers in this thread really demonstrate the damage that right wing propaganda is doing to this country. Republicans legitimately seem confused about basic civics stuff, and that would be okay (we all forget some of that stuff) if they didn’t believe conspiracy theories instead of searching out the actual answers.


No, I think there is a troll that likes to rile people up. They may not even be a true believer.


A true believer? WTAF?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


More than just one tunnel? From 2019.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-mar-a-lago-security-breach-arrest-tunnel-mark-lindblom-a8934366.html?amp

“A student gained access to Donald Trump's Florida residence while the president was staying at the property after sneaking through a tunnel leading from a nearby beach.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go


Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.


The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.



Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?


The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.


“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

That was months and months before the search and after NARA’s criminal referral to the DOJ. What is this from? Why is “acting” in quotes?


Nara’s letter stated specifically that WH counsel was involved, and the lawyer stated that he spoke to Biden about waiving privilege. Biden might have not know what date the raid was going down, but he knew it was going down. Where else have we heard the line ‘we heard about it through media the day the American people did”? Obama era

AGAIN, confirming to NARA in 2021 that the current President’s administration has executive privilege and the former President’s does not has nothing to do with the FBI’s schedule in 2022. And sorry Obama hurt you.
Anonymous
Just stop. Executive Privilege never means that Trump can keep government documents. If it is a Presidential record, the National Archives controls it and access to it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The right wing excuses and non-answers in this thread really demonstrate the damage that right wing propaganda is doing to this country. Republicans legitimately seem confused about basic civics stuff, and that would be okay (we all forget some of that stuff) if they didn’t believe conspiracy theories instead of searching out the actual answers.


Republicans:

Here's a simple test for figuring out when you are being manipulated by your so-called "media" sources:

If you change "Trump" to "Hillary" or "Obama" in any headline, does your feeling about the topic at hand immediately change to the exact opposite?

"Trump kept classified documents in boxes in his basement." EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE!

"Hillary kept classified documents on a server in her basement." LOCK HER UP!



By law, Hillary can’t declassify documents

There is no evidence that Trump declassified these documents. By even if he had, they still would not be his documents to take.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go


Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.


The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.



Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?


The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.


“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

That was months and months before the search and after NARA’s criminal referral to the DOJ. What is this from? Why is “acting” in quotes?


Nara’s letter stated specifically that WH counsel was involved, and the lawyer stated that he spoke to Biden about waiving privilege. Biden might have not know what date the raid was going down, but he knew it was going down. Where else have we heard the line ‘we heard about it through media the day the American people did”? Obama era


Biden can’t help that people at NARA found evidence of a felony. The presidential records act requires an existing president to consent for those records to be shared. That’s what they asked for and got. Should he have said no? And covered up for TFG’s crimes? Who gives a rats ass if Biden knew about TFG’s crimes? I would hope he knows more than anyone about what nefarious crap that guy was up to, so he can protect our national security. Doesn’t mean he’s directing criminal investigations or prosecutions. Just face it. Trump is a criminal.
Anonymous
Most normal people have no idea how scary the words “special access program” is.

Finding those kinds of documents in random boxes of crap, in a closet at a private residence, is like finding a bloody knife and footprints.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: