Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

The Executive Privilege chatter is a red herring. Guess who holds the privilege? The people who took the docs back -- the Executive Branch. Trump seems to think it is a "Donald Privilege," but it isn't and never was his personally -- it belongs to the Office, and he isn't in that office anymore. He doesn't get to use that claim of privilege to withhold documents from those who do hold that privilege.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go

Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.

The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.

Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?

The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.

“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

That was months and months before the search and after NARA’s criminal referral to the DOJ. What is this from? Why is “acting” in quotes?

[Anonymous]

"just the news" .. LOL. a right wing talking head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go

Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.

The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.

Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?

The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.

“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

These are two contradictory statements. Biden deferred, but Biden set the raid in motion?

A memo obtained by "Just the News". OK, wait here while I google them and find out more about how reputable or biased "Just the News" is. Never heard of em before. I'm thinking they are "fair and balanced" just like Fox, eh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go

Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.

The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.

Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?

The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.

“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

These are two contradictory statements. Biden deferred, but Biden set the raid in motion?

A memo obtained by "Just the News". OK, wait here while I google them and find out more about how reputable or biased "Just the News" is. Never heard of em before. I'm thinking they are "fair and balanced" just like Fox, eh?

Hey look what is at the top of "JUST THE NEWS". Fair and balanced indeed!!!

https://friendsofrondesantis.com/bidens-buses-g/?utm_medium=ad&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=20220607_ford_lb_biden-buses_google&utm_content=ford&gclid=CjwKCAjwmJeYBhAwEiwAXlg0AS-x8IA-e5h0o8IX2yDtBle490J2CgRR1Ty_8VhuUmm5Z2XwmGrwMRoCkWYQAvD_BwE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go

Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.

The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.

Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?

The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.

“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

These are two contradictory statements. Biden deferred, but Biden set the raid in motion?

A memo obtained by "Just the News". OK, wait here while I google them and find out more about how reputable or biased "Just the News" is. Never heard of em before. I'm thinking they are "fair and balanced" just like Fox, eh?

Hey look what is at the top of "JUST THE NEWS". Fair and balanced indeed!!!

https://friendsofrondesantis.com/bidens-buses-g/?utm_medium=ad&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=20220607_ford_lb_biden-buses_google&utm_content=ford&gclid=CjwKCAjwmJeYBhAwEiwAXlg0AS-x8IA-e5h0o8IX2yDtBle490J2CgRR1Ty_8VhuUmm5Z2XwmGrwMRoCkWYQAvD_BwE

Just the News is John Solomon’s site. What makes you think it was ever fair and balanced?

[Anonymous]

That whole fairy tale is ignorant nonsense. Ignorant about Executive Privilege. Ignorant about NARA. Ignorant about the White House. It is very simple. Government documents are owned by the Government. Mar A Lago is not the government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That whole fairy tale is ignorant nonsense. Ignorant about Executive Privilege. Ignorant about NARA. Ignorant about the White House. It is very simple. Government documents are owned by the Government. Mar A Lago is not the government.

Trump’s next argument: January 20 was winter and Mar-a-Lago is the winter White House so…

[Anonymous]

The right wing excuses and non-answers in this thread really demonstrate the damage that right wing propaganda is doing to this country. Republicans legitimately seem confused about basic civics stuff, and that would be okay (we all forget some of that stuff) if they didn’t believe conspiracy theories instead of searching out the actual answers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That whole fairy tale is ignorant nonsense. Ignorant about Executive Privilege. Ignorant about NARA. Ignorant about the White House. It is very simple. Government documents are owned by the Government. Mar A Lago is not the government.

Trump ^ in a nutshell = ignorant. Again, unfit to have been POTUS then and now. Please God, no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go

Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.

The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.

Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?

The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.

“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

That is just ignoring the months and months Trump had to comply. He made an argument about privilege. It failed. Someone explained that to him, and he still refused to hand over the documents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The right wing excuses and non-answers in this thread really demonstrate the damage that right wing propaganda is doing to this country. Republicans legitimately seem confused about basic civics stuff, and that would be okay (we all forget some of that stuff) if they didn’t believe conspiracy theories instead of searching out the actual answers.

No, I think there is a troll that likes to rile people up. They may not even be a true believer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The rest of that story is that Biden was in this from the beginning and didn’t hear about it ‘when we did, through the media’. His administration waived Trump’s executive privilege. That will probably go to the SC. Given the history of the FBI targeting, I know how that will probably go

Source for these claims?

Idiot PP took the bait. Trumpy “journalist” John Solomon was given the OK to release the letter to get his base all riled up about Biden. But what the letter actually does reveal is hideously bad for Trump.

There is no bait to take. What I said was true. Garland said it was all him and the Biden administration claimed they had nothing to do with it.

The raid, dummy. Biden said he had nothing to do with the raid. That is different than the substance of the underlying dispute. Really people stop creating false disputes.

Ah, so Biden found out about it when we did?

The raid? Yes. Unless you have some proof that Biden is lying.

“According to memos obtained by Just the News, the National ‘acting’ Archivist ran to Joe Biden’s White House, talked to the lawyer, and said Trump’s asserting executive privilege over some presidential papers at Mar-a-Lago. Can you waive your predecessor’s privilege?” Watters recapped.

“The Counsel to the President has informed me that, in light of the particular circumstances presented here,” Wall’s letter stated, “President Biden defers to my determination, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, regarding whether or not I should uphold the former President’s purported ‘protective assertion of executive privilege’…I have therefore decided not to honor the former President’s ‘protective’ claim of privilege.”

“This has never been done before and Joe Biden’s lawyer said yeah, waive the privilege. And that set the raid in motion,”

That is just ignoring the months and months Trump had to comply. He made an argument about privilege. It failed. Someone explained that to him, and he still refused to hand over the documents

That new piece in the Post said it was Cipollone on or before January 20, FFS. Then Trump didn’t like that answer so he fired him as the person in charge of the documents.

[Anonymous]

Trump is telling his lawyers: Get "my" top secret documents back. LOL

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tells-lawyers-get-my-top-secrets-documents-back-1234580501/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is telling his lawyers: Get "my" top secret documents back. LOL

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tells-lawyers-get-my-top-secrets-documents-back-1234580501/

Why?? Couldn't he just make copies?