Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think many of you leftists have no idea why Kirk's assassination has turned into such a big deal.
Kirk was doing it "the right way" according to the left. Disagree politely, listen, give the other side space.
And he was killed because leftists didn't like what he had to say (as this thread amply shows) and they didn't want him to keep saying it.
Lots and lots of the "Democrat base" are celebrating and cheering the deliberate murder of someone who had the guts to publicly disagree with the left. "Debate this!" I see the signs being posted on college campuses, with a drawing of Kirk bleeding out from his neck.
So.
What value is there is "peace" and "restraint" when leftists murdered the most prominent guy on the right who was all about peace and restraint? And celebrate his death?
If you leftists are so glad to see Kirk killed... well, there's no possibility of peace, is there. He WAS the "peaceful solution". And leftists murdered him for it. Or at least are very happy about it.
If Kirk is not acceptable to the left.... we all know you guys would GLADLY kill the rest of us, too.
Kirk was a sort of "ambassador" to the left... and he was murdered because of it. What happens when an ambassador is killed? That's a casus belli and has been since Ghengis Khan, at the very least.
I don’t appreciate the broad generalization happening here. First off, this person probably worked alone, 75 million people and or anyone official is involved here. I have no control over what others say or do. And I think “lots” is an exaggeration. The celebrators are a minority amongst a large group of people.