The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol where are all the posters who spent pages on pages saying Natasha was not abusing pills and Kane was the one “slurring” on the radio? Now it’s pivoted to “well okay she was an addict but he might have been one too” like WHAT??

And to whoever said everything is already out there that will hurt his daughters, no it’s not because Natasha is planning on publishing chapters of new information that no one has publicly known before. So she is choosing to share “her truth” rather than triage the damage already done to her daughters.

It can't get much worse than the publications of daddy's arrest for domestic violence and books written about him being a sexist racist abusive man

Um that wasn’t a book. That was a Microsoft word document passed off as a book because with Amazon anyone can be an author.

+1. Anyone who thinks that book is a legitimate source of information is an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

I'm waiting for him to confirm he's not. Where is he again, after being abruptly fired from his multiple jobs? And WHY?

Why do you keep deflecting back to Peter when we are talking about Natasha? "What about Peter?" "How about Peter admitting his faults?" etc.

You sound like Natasha. WE ARE DISCUSSING NATASHA'S own words, not Peter.

We're discussing both of them as the thread is about HIM in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol where are all the posters who spent pages on pages saying Natasha was not abusing pills and Kane was the one “slurring” on the radio? Now it’s pivoted to “well okay she was an addict but he might have been one too” like WHAT??

And to whoever said everything is already out there that will hurt his daughters, no it’s not because Natasha is planning on publishing chapters of new information that no one has publicly known before. So she is choosing to share “her truth” rather than triage the damage already done to her daughters.

It can't get much worse than the publications of daddy's arrest for domestic violence and books written about him being a sexist racist abusive man

A thousand times this. Everyone already knows about him, a quick google search takes care of that. You're giving Natasha and her blog waaaaaay too much credit.

[Anonymous]

Racist? Sexist? Are we just throwing random accusations out there now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

I'm waiting for him to confirm he's not. Where is he again, after being abruptly fired from his multiple jobs? And WHY?

Why do you keep deflecting back to Peter when we are talking about Natasha? "What about Peter?" "How about Peter admitting his faults?" etc.

You sound like Natasha. WE ARE DISCUSSING NATASHA'S own words, not Peter.

DP but Peter/Kane hasn't said anything. No one knows why he was canned. And he'll never be honest and tell the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now that Nat has confirmed she was an addict I’m not mad at Kane for wanting to keep his daughters away from her at that time. However it seems like she’s sober now and they should try to peacefully coparent as much as they can.

I'm waiting for him to confirm he's not. Where is he again, after being abruptly fired from his multiple jobs? And WHY?

Why do you keep deflecting back to Peter when we are talking about Natasha? "What about Peter?" "How about Peter admitting his faults?" etc.

You sound like Natasha. WE ARE DISCUSSING NATASHA'S own words, not Peter.

Uh, this is "the kane show discussion thread"

THIS

[Anonymous]

I can't wait to read everything that Kane has spent a ton of money trying hide!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't wait to read everything that Kane has spent a ton of money trying hide!

SAME. I'll be waiting for every single word of every blog post!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't wait to read everything that Kane has spent a ton of money trying hide!

She better write it fast while the courts are closed and his lawyer can't file any type of injunction.

[Anonymous]

How many times now has Natasha vowed to tell all, to share her story, to out the manipulative, abusive side of Kane? Too many. This many vague blog and IG posts later alluding to such abuses, this latest attempt is I look forward to see if she actually tells any of her story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many times now has Natasha vowed to tell all, to share her story, to out the manipulative, abusive side of Kane? Too many. This many vague blog and IG posts later alluding to such abuses, this latest attempt is I look forward to see if she actually tells any of her story.

+100000. She's teased us before and nothing pans out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many times now has Natasha vowed to tell all, to share her story, to out the manipulative, abusive side of Kane? Too many. This many vague blog and IG posts later alluding to such abuses, this latest attempt is I look forward to see if she actually tells any of her story.

+100000. She's teased us before and nothing pans out.

I hate to say it, but I’m doubtful she will post anything else about this.

[Anonymous]

Kane and Natasha are both at fault. We don’t know the truth. Only they do. Maybe the problems in the relationships was partially because she was addict. Yet she says her addiction was because of him. Was it? Or has she always has drug issues? Is he perfect. No. But he has their daughters more than she does so there is somethjng to be said for that. She claims he had the money to beat her in court. I think the judge saw the dysfunctions and places the girls with him full-time. Do you know how difficult it is to not have kids, especially girls be taken from their mom. I grew up in a home with an addicted, abusive mother. I saw my dad do things to stop her from doing things. It’s never pretty. But people are so quick to blame
Men, when in fact it is both.

As for his cohosts. I have no idea what happened there. John was his best friend at some point and defends him. I’m sure Kane is hard to work with. But he did something right for 24 years and no charges have been brought against him or IHEART. So if there was an issue HR could say sign this and you’ll get severance but you can never talk. Or you walk away with nothing and get your freedom to speak. Danny is far from innocent. Everything she goes near breaks and she blames someone else. She was on Bridezilla. You don’t think there was truth to that attitude. Her husband cheats. She’s broken. 99.5 “fires” her. But it’s Kane’s fault. The next radio show she goes off on air when she claims she didn’t know about the skit, when others said she did. She plays the victim. I’m
Sure There is truth to her story. But it’s always someone else. Never her. I can’t deal with people like that. You know I got screwed over by men. Bosses. As I reflect I know I made my choices too. The bad relationships are never one sides. Everyone needs to own their shit. Kane, Natasha Danni and the rest of the crew. Kane wasn’t all bad for them. He gave them a name and following.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does that only leave Baltimore and DC as their radio market? Considering Kane had a multi-million dollar syndicated contract, YMS is not going to last more then a few months if these small to medium sized markets keep dropping.

When they got syndicated they were on in Tampa, Baltimore, Cincy, Memphis, Louisville, and Harrisburg PA. I don't know when they lost Harrisburg because apparently that's a rock station now, but I do recall they did lose Cincy a couple years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kane and Natasha are both at fault. We don’t know the truth. Only they do. Maybe the problems in the relationships was partially because she was addict. Yet she says her addiction was because of him. Was it? Or has she always has drug issues? Is he perfect. No. But he has their daughters more than she does so there is somethjng to be said for that. She claims he had the money to beat her in court. I think the judge saw the dysfunctions and places the girls with him full-time. Do you know how difficult it is to not have kids, especially girls be taken from their mom. I grew up in a home with an addicted, abusive mother.

It’s clear that Natasha isn’t abusive now and parental alienation is a real thing and if Kane is doing that, then he needs to reprimanded by the court.