BOE - who are people voting for?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


Thanks very much, this was really helpful!



Yes so helpful.

Whoever wrote the Diaz section thank you. I felt the same. Curriculum I dislike how she rambles and is all over the place.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


You're picking the Apple ballot! It's hard to go wrong if you vote with the Apple ballot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


Thanks very much, this was really helpful!



Yes so helpful.

Whoever wrote the Diaz section thank you. I felt the same. Curriculum I dislike how she rambles and is all over the place.


She will not anwser basic questions and her anwsers are quotes from history that have no relevance. She will not discuss her employment history, if her preschool program she runs is even licensed and legal, etc. One of her kids is homeschooled too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.



Same for me and I feel like Diaz same was so disgusting to her co workers and administration. I won’t vote for Diaz either.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.


I never said I was Montoya supporter; just noting Harris' shortcomings. Sounds like you have a personal ax to grind with unsubstantiated allegations.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.



Same for me and I feel like Diaz same was so disgusting to her co workers and administration. I won’t vote for Diaz either.


Sounds like an anti-hispanic bias. I bet you're also not voting for Shebra Evans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


Yup. Harris is smart, but she's not humble and she can't admit her flaws or mistakes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.



Same for me and I feel like Diaz same was so disgusting to her co workers and administration. I won’t vote for Diaz either.


Sounds like an anti-hispanic bias. I bet you're also not voting for Shebra Evans.


Spot on for a Lynne Harris supporter given Lynne's previous gig in ensuring that people got deported (by pushing back on immigration appeals). She'll claim that she was just doing her job and following orders working for DOJ. I heard that one before at certain trials in Nuremberg. She always had the option of seeking employment elsewhere.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.



Same for me and I feel like Diaz same was so disgusting to her co workers and administration. I won’t vote for Diaz either.


Sounds like an anti-hispanic bias. I bet you're also not voting for Shebra Evans.


Spot on for a Lynne Harris supporter given Lynne's previous gig in ensuring that people got deported (by pushing back on immigration appeals). She'll claim that she was just doing her job and following orders working for DOJ. I heard that one before at certain trials in Nuremberg. She always had the option of seeking employment elsewhere.


This checks out: lots of spanish last names in her case load.

1. Jimenez v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 12, 2005 128 Fed.Appx. 661 2005 WL 1126982

Petitioner Calixto Jimenez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) opinion affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his request for asylum and withholding of removal based on the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. We have jurisdiction…

…Homeland Security , San Francisco, CA, Mary Jane Candaux , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

2. Avanesov v. Keisler
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 05, 2007 253 Fed.Appx. 666 2007 WL 3250731

The oral argument scheduled in this case for November 7, 2007 is vacated. Pursuant to the motion by the Attorney General, we vacate the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) in this case and remand the petition for review to the BIA so that it may consider Petitioner Avanesov’s claim that the immigration judge was biased…

…WA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz , Esq., Cindy S. Ferrier , Esq., R. Lynne Harris , Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

3. Li v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 11, 2005 127 Fed.Appx. 988 2005 WL 1111799

The immigration judge (“IJ”) did not abuse her discretion when she denied Li’s motion to reopen as untimely. Li was served with notice of his original deportation proceedings by certified mail; after he failed to appear, he was properly ordered deported pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1252b(c)(3) (1993) (repealed),…

…of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ronald N. Ohata R. Lynne Harris DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

4. Kikoyan v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 16, 2005 134 Fed.Appx. 193 2005 WL 1404788

Tamara Jora Kikoyan is a native and citizen of Armenia. She appeals a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying her asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Adverse credibility findings are reviewed under the deferential substantial evidence standard and will be upheld unless the evidence compels a…

…of Homeland Security , San Francisco, CA, Margaret Perry , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

5. Villalobos v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 16, 2006 171 Fed.Appx. 180 2006 WL 679475

Carmela Concepcion Villalobos, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order pretermitting her application for asylum, and denying her application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture…

…District Counsel , Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division , Washington, D.C., for Respondent…

6. Scott v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. October 28, 2004 111 Fed.Appx. 698 2004 WL 2423530

Collins Sabum Scott, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, designated by the Board as the final agency…

…Keisler , Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Walters , Assistant Director, R. Lynne Harris , Senior Trial Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division , United…

7. Song v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 11, 2005 127 Fed.Appx. 957 2005 WL 824096

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Alien did not show probability of persecution on ground warranting withholding of removal.

…the District Counsel , San Francisco, CA, Margaret J. Perry R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

8. Echeverria-Ruiz v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 15, 2006 173 Fed.Appx. 609 2006 WL 679926

Angelina Damitas Echeverria–Ruiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture…

…Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

9. Rios-Munoz v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 22, 2006 168 Fed.Appx. 821 2006 WL 448711

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Alien’s fear of future persecution was undermined by fact that she remained in country for seven years without incident.

…District Counsel , San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice , Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition…

10. Avetisyan v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 12, 2005 134 Fed.Appx. 127 2005 WL 1126980

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Alien who failed to provide corroborating evidence thus failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

…Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, Margaret Perry , Esq., Jacqueline Dryden R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

11. Markosyan v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 11, 2005 127 Fed.Appx. 954 2005 WL 824075

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Asylum applicant did not show past persecution in Armenia.

…Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James E. Grimes , Esq., R. Lynne Harris DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

12. Singh v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 24, 2005 133 Fed.Appx. 408 2005 WL 1220634

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Substantial evidence supported determination that Indo-Fijian alien was not eligible for asylum.

…Immigration & Naturalization Service , Laguna Niguel, CA, Margaret Perry , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

13. Aboozar v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. January 14, 2005 119 Fed.Appx. 524 2005 WL 83868

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to review IJ’s determination that alien failed to timely file asylum application.

…Keisler , Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Walters , Assistant Director, R. Lynne Harris Office of Immigration Litigation , Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Before NIEMEYER…

14. Wirasto v. Mukasey
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 18, 2011 409 Fed.Appx. 142 2011 WL 148780

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Evidence supported BIA’s finding that Indonesian Christians did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

…OIL, Mark C. Walters , Esq., Jennifer L. Lightbody , Esq., R. Lynne Harris , DOJ–U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

15. Guerrero-Hernandez v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 09, 2004 117 Fed.Appx. 547 2004 WL 2823308

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Withholding of removal and CAT relief were properly denied since internal relocation was reasonable.

…Mark C. Walters , Esq., Anh–Thu P. Mai , Esq., R. Lynne Harris DOJ–U.S. Department Of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

16. Sutanto v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 08, 2005 123 Fed.Appx. 380 2005 WL 547363

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Substantial evidence supported immigration judge’s determination that alien was not entitled to restriction on removal.

…Dist. Dir., Immigration & Naturalization Service , Denver, CO, General Counsel, R. Lynne Harris United States Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation , Washington…

17. Mucllari v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 11, 2005 138 Fed.Appx. 748 2005 WL 1621093

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Alien seeking asylum failed to prove past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.

…Weideman & Weideman , Grosse Pointe Woods, MI, for Petitioner-Appellant. R.Lynne HarrisOffice of Immigration Litigatin , Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee. Before…

18. Berishaj v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. August 05, 2004 378 F.3d 314 2004 WL 1746299

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. IJ erred in determining that ethnic Albanian’s testimony was not credible.

…NY, for Petitioner. Brenda M. O’Malley (Argued), Lyle D. Jentzer Lynne R. Harris United States Department of Justice , Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington…

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.



Same for me and I feel like Diaz same was so disgusting to her co workers and administration. I won’t vote for Diaz either.


Sounds like an anti-hispanic bias. I bet you're also not voting for Shebra Evans.


Evans is Hispanic?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The league of women voters forum was illuminating.

Diaz vs Zimmerman

Zimmerman was the clear winner. She was focused and disciplined in her responses and emphasized the disconnect between policy and implementation. Also leaned in on science of reading and an early warning system.

Diaz was unfocused and rambled. She wandered off on tangents and didn’t express a vision. Her strength was her clear passion for a rigorous curriculum but it got lost in her rambling anecdotes about reading Shakespeare in a GT program in the Bronx.

Evans vs Stewart

Stewart was the stronger of the two though it was closer. I am not sure Evans’ strategy of reminding people she’s been on the board, including in a leadership role, for 8 years was wise.

Stewart focused on accountability and transparency and gave a lot of clear examples like deferred maintenance. Evans sounded defensive and mentioned pre-K expansion a lot which is fine but not our only priority.

Harris vs Montoya

I’d call this a tie. Both women came across as smart, informed, persistent, and prepared. The tossup here is whether you want to throw the bums out or not. I am leaning toward Harris personally as I think Montoya is an unknown factor and Harris has been working hard on fiscal management changes, but the forum performances were both good.


What is interesting is the programs the current BOE cut were the pre-k expansion, an autism program, a trade school program and the MVA, all programs that directly impact students. There is zero transparency or accountability on how the money is spent which is a huge red flag.

Harris is nasty and self-serving. She hasn't done much positive since she got on the board. Evans might be ok but she will not stand up for what she believes in and goes along with the group.

Zimmerman is the very clear winner here. Diaz has too many red flags.


Harris is so out of touch. The way she demeaned the muslim student was entirely inappropriate and unbecoming of an elected official. And calling the students her "spirit guides" just shows you how insensitive she is to students color. Further, she thinks that there is only a "perception" of fiscal management in MCPS. She owns the electronic school bus debacle and was seen on video enthusiastically supporting the Biedelmen promotion when she obviously didn't conduct any due diligence. She has horrible fiscal management instincts and any suggestion to the contrary is a delusion


So, you trust Montoya, who has never touched a public budget in her life? This Rita Montoya:


A teacher who has worked at North Chevy Chase Elementary School for many years told me that Montoya, when she was NCC’s PTA President in 2023-2024, bullied teachers and abused her position in the PTA. “ … she bullied a first year teacher to the point of tears during parent - teacher conferences. That young woman has since left teaching all together. She tried to get the much beloved interim principal, Matt Johnson, fired. Matt used to be the principal at Eastern MS. She blocked him from attending PTA meetings, and she bounced parents she didn’t like from the PTA Zoom mtgs. She couldn’t fill five of the ten PTA board positions b/c so few wanted to work with her. There were no cultural arts programs last year. She flouted the PTA bylaws and refused to resign her position as NCC PTA prez when she decided to run for BoE. The Culture & Heritage (formerly known as International Night) was a hot mess. She wasn’t happy with what the teachers organized for the 2023 event, so she decided to take command of the 2024 event. She ended up using every single activity that the teachers used in 2023.” When she found out that the NCC community was upset over her handling of the Culture and Heritage Night, she got her husband to submit a Maryland Public Information Act request for all emails from NCC staff that mentioned the event as an intimidation tactic. The teacher also said "The MCEA building reps for NCCES chose not to bring forward a motion to ask MCEA to rescind their Apple Ballot endorsement of Montoya. They are too scared of retribution. It's really sad. I worked at this school for 25 years. These are good people. They do not deserve to be treated this way by anyone, much less a candidate for BoEducation."

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to vote for someone who treated teachers in her kids’ school like that.



Same for me and I feel like Diaz same was so disgusting to her co workers and administration. I won’t vote for Diaz either.


Sounds like an anti-hispanic bias. I bet you're also not voting for Shebra Evans.


Spot on for a Lynne Harris supporter given Lynne's previous gig in ensuring that people got deported (by pushing back on immigration appeals). She'll claim that she was just doing her job and following orders working for DOJ. I heard that one before at certain trials in Nuremberg. She always had the option of seeking employment elsewhere.


This checks out: lots of spanish last names in her case load.

1. Jimenez v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 12, 2005 128 Fed.Appx. 661 2005 WL 1126982

Petitioner Calixto Jimenez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) opinion affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his request for asylum and withholding of removal based on the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. We have jurisdiction…

…Homeland Security , San Francisco, CA, Mary Jane Candaux , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

2. Avanesov v. Keisler
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 05, 2007 253 Fed.Appx. 666 2007 WL 3250731

The oral argument scheduled in this case for November 7, 2007 is vacated. Pursuant to the motion by the Attorney General, we vacate the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) in this case and remand the petition for review to the BIA so that it may consider Petitioner Avanesov’s claim that the immigration judge was biased…

…WA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz , Esq., Cindy S. Ferrier , Esq., R. Lynne Harris , Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

3. Li v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 11, 2005 127 Fed.Appx. 988 2005 WL 1111799

The immigration judge (“IJ”) did not abuse her discretion when she denied Li’s motion to reopen as untimely. Li was served with notice of his original deportation proceedings by certified mail; after he failed to appear, he was properly ordered deported pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1252b(c)(3) (1993) (repealed),…

…of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ronald N. Ohata R. Lynne Harris DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

4. Kikoyan v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 16, 2005 134 Fed.Appx. 193 2005 WL 1404788

Tamara Jora Kikoyan is a native and citizen of Armenia. She appeals a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying her asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Adverse credibility findings are reviewed under the deferential substantial evidence standard and will be upheld unless the evidence compels a…

…of Homeland Security , San Francisco, CA, Margaret Perry , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

5. Villalobos v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 16, 2006 171 Fed.Appx. 180 2006 WL 679475

Carmela Concepcion Villalobos, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order pretermitting her application for asylum, and denying her application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture…

…District Counsel , Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division , Washington, D.C., for Respondent…

6. Scott v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. October 28, 2004 111 Fed.Appx. 698 2004 WL 2423530

Collins Sabum Scott, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, designated by the Board as the final agency…

…Keisler , Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Walters , Assistant Director, R. Lynne Harris , Senior Trial Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division , United…

7. Song v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 11, 2005 127 Fed.Appx. 957 2005 WL 824096

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Alien did not show probability of persecution on ground warranting withholding of removal.

…the District Counsel , San Francisco, CA, Margaret J. Perry R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

8. Echeverria-Ruiz v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 15, 2006 173 Fed.Appx. 609 2006 WL 679926

Angelina Damitas Echeverria–Ruiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture…

…Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

9. Rios-Munoz v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 22, 2006 168 Fed.Appx. 821 2006 WL 448711

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Alien’s fear of future persecution was undermined by fact that she remained in country for seven years without incident.

…District Counsel , San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice , Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition…

10. Avetisyan v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 12, 2005 134 Fed.Appx. 127 2005 WL 1126980

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Alien who failed to provide corroborating evidence thus failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

…Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, Margaret Perry , Esq., Jacqueline Dryden R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

11. Markosyan v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 11, 2005 127 Fed.Appx. 954 2005 WL 824075

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Asylum applicant did not show past persecution in Armenia.

…Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James E. Grimes , Esq., R. Lynne Harris DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice , Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

12. Singh v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 24, 2005 133 Fed.Appx. 408 2005 WL 1220634

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Substantial evidence supported determination that Indo-Fijian alien was not eligible for asylum.

…Immigration & Naturalization Service , Laguna Niguel, CA, Margaret Perry , Esq., R. Lynne Harris U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit…

13. Aboozar v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. January 14, 2005 119 Fed.Appx. 524 2005 WL 83868

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to review IJ’s determination that alien failed to timely file asylum application.

…Keisler , Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Walters , Assistant Director, R. Lynne Harris Office of Immigration Litigation , Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Before NIEMEYER…

14. Wirasto v. Mukasey
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 18, 2011 409 Fed.Appx. 142 2011 WL 148780

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Evidence supported BIA’s finding that Indonesian Christians did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

…OIL, Mark C. Walters , Esq., Jennifer L. Lightbody , Esq., R. Lynne Harris , DOJ–U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

15. Guerrero-Hernandez v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 09, 2004 117 Fed.Appx. 547 2004 WL 2823308

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Withholding of removal and CAT relief were properly denied since internal relocation was reasonable.

…Mark C. Walters , Esq., Anh–Thu P. Mai , Esq., R. Lynne Harris DOJ–U.S. Department Of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration…

16. Sutanto v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 08, 2005 123 Fed.Appx. 380 2005 WL 547363

IMMIGRATION – Deportation or Removal. Substantial evidence supported immigration judge’s determination that alien was not entitled to restriction on removal.

…Dist. Dir., Immigration & Naturalization Service , Denver, CO, General Counsel, R. Lynne Harris United States Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation , Washington…

17. Mucllari v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 11, 2005 138 Fed.Appx. 748 2005 WL 1621093

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. Alien seeking asylum failed to prove past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.

…Weideman & Weideman , Grosse Pointe Woods, MI, for Petitioner-Appellant. R.Lynne HarrisOffice of Immigration Litigatin , Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee. Before…

18. Berishaj v. Ashcroft
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. August 05, 2004 378 F.3d 314 2004 WL 1746299

IMMIGRATION – Asylum. IJ erred in determining that ethnic Albanian’s testimony was not credible.

…NY, for Petitioner. Brenda M. O’Malley (Argued), Lyle D. Jentzer Lynne R. Harris United States Department of Justice , Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington…



No the only one who wants people deported is Diaz that’s right.

She supports Stephen Miller Mr Deportation himself.

Yes fact she does support Miller and his horrifying ideas.
Anonymous
Brenda Diaz does not support the Hispanic community. Her social media has her supporting RFK Jr and white’s only ideology.
Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Go to: