Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was just flipping channels and some conservative maga mouthpiece is spewing “Charlie lkirk never said anything hateful.”

I am so tired of the gaslighting

Yeah they’re really trying to turn him into RFK Sr. or MLK. It’s gross.

Yup

Well, we have a con man now for President. It's quite possible that we could have a grifting, racist, misogynistic HS drop-out as President in the future. We really have become an Idiocracy.

I think this is the first time Trump has contemplated a successor. Guess you have to be dead/hypothetical to get on that list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, I am not a conspiracy theorist but I am going out on a limb and wagering that all this attention to this unknown person is to divert our attention.

The only true phrase is that you are out on a limb.

Oh please it’s totally conceivable Russia or Trump took him out Epstein is getting hotter by the minute

Plus house Repukes are passing a crappy bill and you know all the money trumps laundering tax dollars

Kirk was just a grifter con man hate filled liar

Kirk was a child.

Kirk was a 32 year old. At what age does one leave child and become a man.

Well I could almost be his parent so he is a very young, inexperienced, most likely disillusioned adult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So his body was flown with an honor guard?

That’s…new.

I feel like I am missing something. This guy wasn’t very well known, sorry to burst some bubbles. It’s horrible, devastating, same as any death due to murder. But why the pomp and circumstance?

You also realize every American flag is being flown at half mast in his honor? Until Sunday.

I thought it was for 9/11 today? No? It’s for Charlie Kirk?

We didn't lower flags to half mast when servicemembers were killed in action, or for many other tragedies. Thus Charlie Kirk doesn't deserve it either.

Well the elected President disagrees with you.

I didn't elect him and I don't give two shits what he thinks. I follow what real presidents did, not this fraudulent sham of a president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So his body was flown with an honor guard?

That’s…new.

I feel like I am missing something. This guy wasn’t very well known, sorry to burst some bubbles. It’s horrible, devastating, same as any death due to murder. But why the pomp and circumstance?

You also realize every American flag is being flown at half mast in his honor? Until Sunday.

I thought it was for 9/11 today? No? It’s for Charlie Kirk?

We didn't lower flags to half mast when servicemembers were killed in action, or for many other tragedies. Thus Charlie Kirk doesn't deserve it either.

Well the elected President disagrees with you.

I didn't elect him and I don't give two shits what he thinks. I follow what real presidents did, not this fraudulent sham of a president.

Good to know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So his body was flown with an honor guard?

That’s…new.

I feel like I am missing something. This guy wasn’t very well known, sorry to burst some bubbles. It’s horrible, devastating, same as any death due to murder. But why the pomp and circumstance?

You also realize every American flag is being flown at half mast in his honor? Until Sunday.

I thought it was for 9/11 today? No? It’s for Charlie Kirk?

Correct. The order was made late yesterday.

Keep up.

For a guy who was famous for saying women should be subordinate to their husbands? How are even Republicans not embarrassed by this?

[Anonymous]

How conspicuous do you make yourself by jumping off a roof with a gun? That's attention -drawing, IMO.
Surely you could more readily maintain safety and discretion if you left the gun on the roof and took the stairs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He's right.

Federal law enforcement has designated right-wing violence as the most pressing domestic terror threat.

This is simply a fact. The assassination of Kirk doesn't change that.

Where is your fact coming from? Out of curiosity, I looked to see if the federal government has said this. I didn't find anything supporting your fact. Rather, this Homeland Security report from 2025 identifies Domestic Violent Extremists as the primary threat, and defines them to be individuals motivated by various ideologies (emphasis added):

A Domestic Violent Extremist (DVE) is an individual based and operating primarily within the United States or its territories without direction or inspiration from a foreign terrorist group or other foreign power who seeks to further political or social goals wholly or in part through unlawful acts of force or violence. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics alone does not constitute violent extremism and may be constitutionally protected. DVEs can fit within one or multiple categories of ideological motivation and can span a broad range of groups or movements. I&A utilizes this term synonymously with “domestic terrorist.”

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/24_0930_ia_24-320-ia-publication-2025-hta-final-30sep24-508.pdf

The extremism needs to be dialed down and we need better gun control. Anyone disagreeing with this is just plain wrong.

On the sidelines politically, but you are crazy. A person was politically targeted for exposing political stuff, and you think they are going to give up their guns so they can be murdered more easily? LMAO!

This event will cause another 100 million gun sales in the USA, adding to the already 900 million firearms out there.

Bullshit. "Good guys with guns" haven't stopped shit.

You are full of crap with your "murdered more easily."

All you are doing is shilling for the gun industry to sell more death and misery.

Well Charlie’s guns sadly didn’t save him. This is how it works. We need major gun control, someone needs to be the adult here and take control. Stop the gun violence, enforce mental health screenings, etc. Where are the leaders here? We need grown ups.

More guns has only led to more gun deaths. "Give up our guns" people are in deep delusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: The media coverage of this murder is wildly out of proportion to Charlie Kirk’s relevance.

A lot more people agree with you than not. Look this 24-hour news coverage is ridiculous. Not one mention today of the murders in Colorado. Half of America are saying Charlie who, or that guy who was killed that’s all in the news. What did he do?

Yeah I had never heard his name before the shooting. Even after the shooting I had no idea it would blow up like this.

This is the first I had ever heard of Charlie Kirk. Absolutely no clue who this person was.

He is MAGA famous. If you aren’t into online political content on twitter and tik tok, odds are you won’t know him.

He was youth famous. It is not surprising DCUM posters, who tend to be out of touch with youth trends, did not know him.

He was WHITE youth famous.

So?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He's right.

Federal law enforcement has designated right-wing violence as the most pressing domestic terror threat.

This is simply a fact. The assassination of Kirk doesn't change that.

Where is your fact coming from? Out of curiosity, I looked to see if the federal government has said this. I didn't find anything supporting your fact. Rather, this Homeland Security report from 2025 identifies Domestic Violent Extremists as the primary threat, and defines them to be individuals motivated by various ideologies (emphasis added):

A Domestic Violent Extremist (DVE) is an individual based and operating primarily within the United States or its territories without direction or inspiration from a foreign terrorist group or other foreign power who seeks to further political or social goals wholly or in part through unlawful acts of force or violence. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics alone does not constitute violent extremism and may be constitutionally protected. DVEs can fit within one or multiple categories of ideological motivation and can span a broad range of groups or movements. I&A utilizes this term synonymously with “domestic terrorist.”

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/24_0930_ia_24-320-ia-publication-2025-hta-final-30sep24-508.pdf

The extremism needs to be dialed down and we need better gun control. Anyone disagreeing with this is just plain wrong.

On the sidelines politically, but you are crazy. A person was politically targeted for exposing political stuff, and you think they are going to give up their guns so they can be murdered more easily? LMAO!

This event will cause another 100 million gun sales in the USA, adding to the already 900 million firearms out there.

Bullshit. "Good guys with guns" haven't stopped shit.

You are full of crap with your "murdered more easily."

All you are doing is shilling for the gun industry to sell more death and misery.

Well Charlie’s guns sadly didn’t save him. This is how it works. We need major gun control, someone needs to be the adult here and take control. Stop the gun violence, enforce mental health screenings, etc. Where are the leaders here? We need grown ups.

Nope. Not anymore. I’m no longer supporting gun control after yesterday. These MAGAs are insane and they’re out for blood. Every Progressive and Dem needs to be armed now. As has aptly been demonstrated, these trash MAGAs have the monopoly on violence right now and are not afraid to murder whoever they wish. We cannot allow this to continue. There are already too many guns out there to seize, and implementing gun control now will just make it harder for us to catch up to them. It will forever put us at a disadvantage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: The media coverage of this murder is wildly out of proportion to Charlie Kirk’s relevance.

A lot more people agree with you than not. Look this 24-hour news coverage is ridiculous. Not one mention today of the murders in Colorado. Half of America are saying Charlie who, or that guy who was killed that’s all in the news. What did he do?

Yeah I had never heard his name before the shooting. Even after the shooting I had no idea it would blow up like this.

This is the first I had ever heard of Charlie Kirk. Absolutely no clue who this person was.

He is MAGA famous. If you aren’t into online political content on twitter and tik tok, odds are you won’t know him.

I didn’t hear about him until he paid for dozens of buses to take people to the Capitol on January 6.

[Anonymous]

I think many of you leftists have no idea why Kirk's assassination has turned into such a big deal.

Kirk was doing it "the right way" according to the left. Disagree politely, listen, give the other side space.

And he was killed because leftists didn't like what he had to say (as this thread amply shows) and they didn't want him to keep saying it.

Lots and lots of the "Democrat base" are celebrating and cheering the deliberate murder of someone who had the guts to publicly disagree with the left. "Debate this!" I see the signs being posted on college campuses, with a drawing of Kirk bleeding out from his neck.

So.

What value is there is "peace" and "restraint" when leftists murdered the most prominent guy on the right who was all about peace and restraint? And celebrate his death?

If you leftists are so glad to see Kirk killed... well, there's no possibility of peace, is there. He WAS the "peaceful solution". And leftists murdered him for it. Or at least are very happy about it.

If Kirk is not acceptable to the left.... we all know you guys would GLADLY kill the rest of us, too.

Kirk was a sort of "ambassador" to the left... and he was murdered because of it. What happens when an ambassador is killed? That's a casus belli and has been since Ghengis Khan, at the very least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think many of you leftists have no idea why Kirk's assassination has turned into such a big deal.

Kirk was doing it "the right way" according to the left. Disagree politely, listen, give the other side space.

And he was killed because leftists didn't like what he had to say (as this thread amply shows) and they didn't want him to keep saying it.

Lots and lots of the "Democrat base" are celebrating and cheering the deliberate murder of someone who had the guts to publicly disagree with the left. "Debate this!" I see the signs being posted on college campuses, with a drawing of Kirk bleeding out from his neck.

So.

What value is there is "peace" and "restraint" when leftists murdered the most prominent guy on the right who was all about peace and restraint? And celebrate his death?

If you leftists are so glad to see Kirk killed... well, there's no possibility of peace, is there. He WAS the "peaceful solution". And leftists murdered him for it. Or at least are very happy about it.

If Kirk is not acceptable to the left.... we all know you guys would GLADLY kill the rest of us, too.

Kirk was a sort of "ambassador" to the left... and he was murdered because of it. What happens when an ambassador is killed? That's a casus belli and has been since Ghengis Khan, at the very least.

Well stated. Agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He's right.

Federal law enforcement has designated right-wing violence as the most pressing domestic terror threat.

This is simply a fact. The assassination of Kirk doesn't change that.

Where is your fact coming from? Out of curiosity, I looked to see if the federal government has said this. I didn't find anything supporting your fact. Rather, this Homeland Security report from 2025 identifies Domestic Violent Extremists as the primary threat, and defines them to be individuals motivated by various ideologies (emphasis added):

A Domestic Violent Extremist (DVE) is an individual based and operating primarily within the United States or its territories without direction or inspiration from a foreign terrorist group or other foreign power who seeks to further political or social goals wholly or in part through unlawful acts of force or violence. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics alone does not constitute violent extremism and may be constitutionally protected. DVEs can fit within one or multiple categories of ideological motivation and can span a broad range of groups or movements. I&A utilizes this term synonymously with “domestic terrorist.”

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/24_0930_ia_24-320-ia-publication-2025-hta-final-30sep24-508.pdf

The extremism needs to be dialed down and we need better gun control. Anyone disagreeing with this is just plain wrong.

On the sidelines politically, but you are crazy. A person was politically targeted for exposing political stuff, and you think they are going to give up their guns so they can be murdered more easily? LMAO!

This event will cause another 100 million gun sales in the USA, adding to the already 900 million firearms out there.

Bullshit. "Good guys with guns" haven't stopped shit.

You are full of crap with your "murdered more easily."

All you are doing is shilling for the gun industry to sell more death and misery.

Well Charlie’s guns sadly didn’t save him. This is how it works. We need major gun control, someone needs to be the adult here and take control. Stop the gun violence, enforce mental health screenings, etc. Where are the leaders here? We need grown ups.

More guns has only led to more gun deaths. "Give up our guns" people are in deep delusion.

The MAGAs aren’t giving up their guns, because that’s how they plan on killing us. It’s time we had guns of our own. There’s no sanctity in being a victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think many of you leftists have no idea why Kirk's assassination has turned into such a big deal.

Kirk was doing it "the right way" according to the left. Disagree politely, listen, give the other side space.

And he was killed because leftists didn't like what he had to say (as this thread amply shows) and they didn't want him to keep saying it.

Lots and lots of the "Democrat base" are celebrating and cheering the deliberate murder of someone who had the guts to publicly disagree with the left. "Debate this!" I see the signs being posted on college campuses, with a drawing of Kirk bleeding out from his neck.

So.

What value is there is "peace" and "restraint" when leftists murdered the most prominent guy on the right who was all about peace and restraint? And celebrate his death?

If you leftists are so glad to see Kirk killed... well, there's no possibility of peace, is there. He WAS the "peaceful solution". And leftists murdered him for it. Or at least are very happy about it.

If Kirk is not acceptable to the left.... we all know you guys would GLADLY kill the rest of us, too.

Kirk was a sort of "ambassador" to the left... and he was murdered because of it. What happens when an ambassador is killed? That's a casus belli and has been since Ghengis Khan, at the very least.

You have no idea why he was killed or who killed him, so maybe just calm down a bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So his body was flown with an honor guard?

That’s…new.

I feel like I am missing something. This guy wasn’t very well known, sorry to burst some bubbles. It’s horrible, devastating, same as any death due to murder. But why the pomp and circumstance?

You also realize every American flag is being flown at half mast in his honor? Until Sunday.

I thought it was for 9/11 today? No? It’s for Charlie Kirk?

We didn't lower flags to half mast when servicemembers were killed in action, or for many other tragedies. Thus Charlie Kirk doesn't deserve it either.

Well the elected President disagrees with you.

I didn't elect him and I don't give two shits what he thinks. I follow what real presidents did, not this fraudulent sham of a president.

Good to know.

Tens of millions of Americans know this and agree he's a trash president. Keep up. The polling numbers show that more and more Americans are waking up to this as well.