What 2011 teams are qualifying this year??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

The player gets seen by all of the colleges that are there to see the team and the opponent. The colleges don’t stop looking when subs are made. Also coaches of high-level teams like that, rotate starters in showcases and in league games because usually everyone is a really good player, but only 11 can start.

You people are clueless! Either parents of mediocre, recruiting age players or parents of u littles that don’t have any of this experience yet. PP that said you should talk to parents of committed players within your club is right.

Top programs are not looking for backups.

You really don’t have a clue. Power 4 recruits come off the bench for top teams. Go watch VDA and RU 09.

The political charity selections for the training center that play in the GA aren’t going to top programs anyways.

If you’re 2010, where would you rather be? BSC or VDA without a training center invitation or would you rather be at Loudoun or SYC OR Alexandria with a training center invitation?

Poster not referencing GA vs ECNL debate. Poster clearly stating that top programs are not looking for backups. They want starters. Not enough top programs to support backups. Let's say you just look at ECNL in same conference e against same competition. The starter from another team is getting looked at more due to same competition with less support. VDA starter over Arlington bench warmer for that top spot.

VDA sub over Arlington starter for that same spot. Look at the commitments…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

The player gets seen by all of the colleges that are there to see the team and the opponent. The colleges don’t stop looking when subs are made. Also coaches of high-level teams like that, rotate starters in showcases and in league games because usually everyone is a really good player, but only 11 can start.

You people are clueless! Either parents of mediocre, recruiting age players or parents of u littles that don’t have any of this experience yet. PP that said you should talk to parents of committed players within your club is right.

Top programs are not looking for backups.

You really don’t have a clue. Power 4 recruits come off the bench for top teams. Go watch VDA and RU 09.

The political charity selections for the training center that play in the GA aren’t going to top programs anyways.

If you’re 2010, where would you rather be? BSC or VDA without a training center invitation or would you rather be at Loudoun or SYC OR Alexandria with a training center invitation?

Poster not referencing GA vs ECNL debate. Poster clearly stating that top programs are not looking for backups. They want starters. Not enough top programs to support backups. Let's say you just look at ECNL in same conference e against same competition. The starter from another team is getting looked at more due to same competition with less support. VDA starter over Arlington bench warmer for that top spot.

VDA sub over Arlington starter for that same spot. Look at the commitments…

True or 07,08,09,10 but definitely not for 2011.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

The player gets seen by all of the colleges that are there to see the team and the opponent. The colleges don’t stop looking when subs are made. Also coaches of high-level teams like that, rotate starters in showcases and in league games because usually everyone is a really good player, but only 11 can start.

You people are clueless! Either parents of mediocre, recruiting age players or parents of u littles that don’t have any of this experience yet. PP that said you should talk to parents of committed players within your club is right.

Top programs are not looking for backups.

You really don’t have a clue. Power 4 recruits come off the bench for top teams. Go watch VDA and RU 09.

The political charity selections for the training center that play in the GA aren’t going to top programs anyways.

If you’re 2010, where would you rather be? BSC or VDA without a training center invitation or would you rather be at Loudoun or SYC OR Alexandria with a training center invitation?

Poster not referencing GA vs ECNL debate. Poster clearly stating that top programs are not looking for backups. They want starters. Not enough top programs to support backups. Let's say you just look at ECNL in same conference e against same competition. The starter from another team is getting looked at more due to same competition with less support. VDA starter over Arlington bench warmer for that top spot.

VDA sub over Arlington starter for that same spot. Look at the commitments…

Ouch

[Anonymous]

VDA - FVU
2011 5:0
some woopage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:VDA - FVU
2011 5:0
some woopage

Belt was given. Must do more rondos to get better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:VDA - FVU
2011 5:0
some woopage

Congratulations for being petty enough to come here less than an hour after whistle to beat up on a bunch of high school freshmen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:VDA - FVU
2011 5:0
some woopage

Belt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FVU 2011 win conference. Season starts off slow but finishes strong.

Bump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FVU 2011 win conference. Season starts off slow but finishes strong.

Bump

More Rondos. Next year run it bk!! Bets on Kalshi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA - FVU
2011 5:0
some woopage

Congratulations for being petty enough to come here less than an hour after whistle to beat up on a bunch of high school freshmen.

Already on the ECNL app. More likely the poster is a parent from a different team that is always trolling.

[Anonymous]

Great girls. Lots of individual talent with buns chemistry. It will all continue to shake out with age group changes.

[Anonymous]

It’s a surprising result worth unpacking. VDA often plays to a 0:0 draw, scoring only 6 goal in the last 8 matches. So what happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:VDA - FVU
2011 5:0
some woopage

Shows FVU went to the beach in winter break LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s a surprising result worth unpacking. VDA often plays to a 0:0 draw, scoring only 6 goal in the last 8 matches. So what happened?

one team had something to play for and prepared with scrimmages and full practices. And The other “crickets”

Poor preparation proceeds poor performance and most of those girls were on “friendlies” mode. Was the New years massacre game.

VDA is ready for the next games and will finish strong.

Interesting sideline chatter I must say. I think we have a runner in the dmv. AGAIN?! Please say it aint so!! Not going to ruin the eventual post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FVU 2011 win conference. Season starts off slow but finishes strong.

We know who posted this. Do you have any important updates for the chat kind sir?