EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.

She has always been anorexic looking. Now that she is HRT and any other medications that may have been prescribed after a total breast removal and hysterectomy, she is not the healthiest looking person. Factor in raising six children (people on DCUM complain about the fatigue of raising two children), her career, her philanthropy, Hollywood diet, and an ongoing lawsuit yes, she would not look like a DCUM mom. I don't know what you mean about recent behavior, perhaps you want to provide source., otherwise it's just more DCUM alternative facts
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?


Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.


How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues.



The judge indicated parental alienation was a factor, and clearly felt Brad was a committed parent and sober, therefore merited 50-50 custody. Who knows what Brad did or did not say about Jolie's problems. It was probably more about demonstrating his fitness as a parent.


The judge did warn her about parental alienation. This is not something Brad and his fans invented. It’s Jolie’s documented behavior. She was obstructing his visits with the children and monitoring his phone calls and texts with the children. She did everything to interfere in his relationship with his children and prevent them from reconciling.


The judge is gone and Brad did not ask for another trial. To think Brad couldn't have done anything else to obtain more time with the kids is also obtuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Links please. If anything you wrote had a shred of truth, Brad's attorneys would have used it in the last seven to eight years. Sham on Brad for allowing his children to remain in a home with a drug induced primary parent and not bringing it up in the family court proceedings. That says a lot about him as a responsible parent, or lack thereof.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?


Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.

Exactly. I just wrote the same thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?


Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.


How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues.


You mean the compromised judge that the appellate court rebuked, reversed, and sent back to be heard by a different judge. No, Brad was not awarded50/50 custody. And no the record was not sealed. TMZ was always reporting on the court proceedings. How do you think the public found out about the information already provided about the allegations made in the pleadings and Maddox's testimony.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?


Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.


How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues.


You mean the compromised judge that the appellate court rebuked, reversed, and sent back to be heard by a different judge. No, Brad was not awarded50/50 custody. And no the record was not sealed. TMZ was always reporting on the court proceedings. How do you think the public found out about the information already provided about the allegations made in the pleadings and Maddox's testimony.


Feels like I am in a fever dream! Like her or not the appellate judges agreed their former judge was wrong. Instead of using a new judge at a new trial, he tried to get the old one back. That didn't happen and never asked for more time.
Anonymous
https://www.tmz.com/2024/06/24/jon-voight-angelina-jolie-vivienne-tonys-outsiders-brad-pitt-broadway/

Jon Voight commented in Angelina’s Tony win. He mentioned speaking to Angelina on the phone, so I guess she is talking to her father now, while at the same time discouraging her children from having a relationship with their father and encouraging them to drop his last name.
Anonymous
She’s still in NYC with Vivienne. What about poor Knox? Kind of odd to go off with one kid for 6 months and leave the other.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Links please. If anything you wrote had a shred of truth, Brad's attorneys would have used it in the last seven to eight years. Sham on Brad for allowing his children to remain in a home with a drug induced primary parent and not bringing it up in the family court proceedings. That says a lot about him as a responsible parent, or lack thereof.


Or maybe he didn't want them to use that and go that low, and felt she has enough help around the kids aren't in danger with her? She's said herself she had tried every single drug out there so it's not like it's a secret.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She’s still in NYC with Vivienne. What about poor Knox? Kind of odd to go off with one kid for 6 months and leave the other.



Hopefully Brad is making the most of his visitation during this time, with a little deprogramming as a result.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She’s still in NYC with Vivienne. What about poor Knox? Kind of odd to go off with one kid for 6 months and leave the other.


There are pictures of them arriving at the airport. I think they flew in for a shopping trip.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She’s still in NYC with Vivienne. What about poor Knox? Kind of odd to go off with one kid for 6 months and leave the other.



Hopefully Brad is making the most of his visitation during this time, with a little deprogramming as a result.


Brad is in Europe.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Links please. If anything you wrote had a shred of truth, Brad's attorneys would have used it in the last seven to eight years. Sham on Brad for allowing his children to remain in a home with a drug induced primary parent and not bringing it up in the family court proceedings. That says a lot about him as a responsible parent, or lack thereof.


Or maybe he didn't want them to use that and go that low, and felt she has enough help around the kids aren't in danger with her? She's said herself she had tried every single drug out there so it's not like it's a secret.


The other poster is right. If that was true then he's an awful parent for allowing a inebriated parent to have primary custody. It doesn't matter if there's other help or not. Too ridiculous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She’s still in NYC with Vivienne. What about poor Knox? Kind of odd to go off with one kid for 6 months and leave the other.



Hopefully Brad is making the most of his visitation during this time, with a little deprogramming as a result.


Brad is in Europe.


I think he is filing his formula one movie.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.


DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.



There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Links please. If anything you wrote had a shred of truth, Brad's attorneys would have used it in the last seven to eight years. Sham on Brad for allowing his children to remain in a home with a drug induced primary parent and not bringing it up in the family court proceedings. That says a lot about him as a responsible parent, or lack thereof.


Or maybe he didn't want them to use that and go that low, and felt she has enough help around the kids aren't in danger with her? She's said herself she had tried every single drug out there so it's not like it's a secret.


The other poster is right. If that was true then he's an awful parent for allowing a inebriated parent to have primary custody. It doesn't matter if there's other help or not. Too ridiculous.


He's a drunk himself. Most of Hollywood people are messed up, even without substance abuse.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: