EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

I still think Brad and Ines are FWB. He gets the cover of monogamy, she becomes a minor celebrity. Her weekly Backgrid pap walks are becoming amusing. She might have waxed first.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13571835/Brad-Pitt-girlfriend-Ines-Ramon-midriff-children.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

This. She has ALWAYS been most concerned about attention and about her image. This is primary to her, regardless of whichever persona she’s working with at the moment: rebel, badass seductress, humanitarian, Queen of Hollywood and now poor sainted abused mother who does nothing wrong & is still, almost a decade later, “healing”. Her sycophants lap up everything “Anj” says and does. Gullible.

In fact, the opposite is true. She dngaf which is why she has no pr team and is so hated. She’s real and doesn’t try to paint herself any other way like the rest of Hollywood. That’s why she’s been labeled a misfit.

She doesn’t have a publicist because she believes she can control her image and handle her publicity better by herself. She is very manipulative in the way she controls her public image. I don’t see her as real at all. I see her as a fake and a phony.

+++1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her

A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3

So pathetic and immature with this “Angie wins” nonsense. It’s all sad as far as I can see. No big winners here. But then again you’re calling her a legend so not a surprise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?
This. She never has and never will. Same goes for card carrying Angeloonies. I dare them to name maybe one thing she’s to blame for that doesn’t involve Brad. Just one fault. They can’t do it. She is or they have to pretend she’s flawless when she clearly isn’t. Like their leader, they never own up to anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?

This. She never has and never will. Same goes for card carrying Angeloonies. I dare them to name maybe one thing she’s to blame for that doesn’t involve Brad. Just one fault. They can’t do it. She is or they have to pretend she’s flawless when she clearly isn’t. Like their leader, they never own up to anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?

Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.

But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.

DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.

There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.

How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues.

The judge indicated parental alienation was a factor, and clearly felt Brad was a committed parent and sober, therefore merited 50-50 custody. Who knows what Brad did or did not say about Jolie's problems. It was probably more about demonstrating his fitness as a parent.

The judge did warn her about parental alienation. This is not something Brad and his fans invented. It’s Jolie’s documented behavior. She was obstructing his visits with the children and monitoring his phone calls and texts with the children. She did everything to interfere in his relationship with his children and prevent them from reconciling.

The judge is gone and Brad did not ask for another trial. To think Brad couldn't have done anything else to obtain more time with the kids is also obtuse.

Brad fought for joint custody from 2016-2021 when it was finally awarded. And it was. Jolie continued to fight him on it even after that. Both in court and at of course at home buzzing in the kids’ ears. This man she praised as a dad for 13 years she wouldn’t allow joint custody. Brad appealed to the state supreme court to keep the judge so that the original ruling would stand. At this point, all the kids are either adults, past the age of 14 when they can decide what they want, or close to it. I wouldn’t refile and start new custody hearings all over gain either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?

Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.

But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.

DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.

There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.

How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues.

The judge indicated parental alienation was a factor, and clearly felt Brad was a committed parent and sober, therefore merited 50-50 custody. Who knows what Brad did or did not say about Jolie's problems. It was probably more about demonstrating his fitness as a parent.

The judge did warn her about parental alienation. This is not something Brad and his fans invented. It’s Jolie’s documented behavior. She was obstructing his visits with the children and monitoring his phone calls and texts with the children. She did everything to interfere in his relationship with his children and prevent them from reconciling.

The judge is gone and Brad did not ask for another trial. To think Brad couldn't have done anything else to obtain more time with the kids is also obtuse.

Brad fought for joint custody from 2016-2021 when it was finally awarded. And it was. Jolie continued to fight him on it even after that. Both in court and at of course at home buzzing in the kids’ ears. This man she praised as a dad for 13 years she wouldn’t allow joint custody. Brad appealed to the state supreme court to keep the judge so that the original ruling would stand. At this point, all the kids are either adults, past the age of 14 when they can decide what they want, or close to it. I wouldn’t refile and start new custody hearings all over gain either.

She fought for years to keep him from getting custody of his children. Their divorce is not final yet, because she would never agree to a reasonable custody agreement. Brad’s sources said years ago that they felt she was trying to destroy any relationship with his children. We see the evidence of that now. She keeps spouting platitudes about wanting her family to “heal”, but she won’t let the family heal because she wants her children to have animosity towards their father.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?

Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.

But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.

DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse.

DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances.

There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point?

Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction.

How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues.

The judge indicated parental alienation was a factor, and clearly felt Brad was a committed parent and sober, therefore merited 50-50 custody. Who knows what Brad did or did not say about Jolie's problems. It was probably more about demonstrating his fitness as a parent.

The judge did warn her about parental alienation. This is not something Brad and his fans invented. It’s Jolie’s documented behavior. She was obstructing his visits with the children and monitoring his phone calls and texts with the children. She did everything to interfere in his relationship with his children and prevent them from reconciling.

The judge is gone and Brad did not ask for another trial. To think Brad couldn't have done anything else to obtain more time with the kids is also obtuse.

At this point, all the kids are either adults, past the age of 14 when they can decide what they want, or close to it. I wouldn’t refile and start new custody hearings all over gain either.

Expect Pax was 17 and wasn't allowed the choice to decide so this doesn't make sense The twins weren't 14 yet. In the end the judges wouldn't have matter.

[Anonymous]

Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

there are no insiders and no one close to Brad is talking to news nation just like they are not talking to intouch weekly. If they were they would get basic information right. Vivienne wasn't a producer. She's was just a assistant. She also received more then 55 million in the the deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

there are no insiders and no one close to Brad is talking to news nation just like they are not talking to intouch weekly. If they were they would get basic information right. Vivienne wasn't a producer. She's was just a assistant. She also received more then 55 million in the the deal.

Paula makes things up. She always has stories about celeb "friends" talking to her. It's all BS. I like newsnation but I don't understand that segment at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

there are no insiders and no one close to Brad is talking to news nation just like they are not talking to intouch weekly. If they were they would get basic information right. Vivienne wasn't a producer. She's was just a assistant. She also received more then 55 million in the the deal.

Paula makes things up. She always has stories about celeb "friends" talking to her. It's all BS. I like newsnation but I don't understand that segment at all.

Eh, she spends money like water. How could she not have financial problems at some point? She needs to find a wealthy mate who paid for everything like Pitt did or she needs to cut back. Beginning with that Atelier Jolie joke of an albatross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

there are no insiders and no one close to Brad is talking to news nation just like they are not talking to intouch weekly. If they were they would get basic information right. Vivienne wasn't a producer. She's was just a assistant. She also received more then 55 million in the the deal.

Paula makes things up. She always has stories about celeb "friends" talking to her. It's all BS. I like newsnation but I don't understand that segment at all.

Eh, she spends money like water. How could she not have financial problems at some point? She needs to find a wealthy mate who paid for everything like Pitt did or she needs to cut back. Beginning with that Atelier Jolie joke of an albatross.

The article confirmed she is spending over $700,000 a year on the storefront for her failed fashion label. Apparently, the store is a ghost town. It’s a vanity project that is going no where. She also must have spent millions “producing” The Outsiders play. She is spending millions, including on lawyer fees, yet she has nothing coming in outside of Brad’s child support, which is only for two children now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

there are no insiders and no one close to Brad is talking to news nation just like they are not talking to intouch weekly. If they were they would get basic information right. Vivienne wasn't a producer. She's was just a assistant. She also received more then 55 million in the the deal.

They must have Angelina's name on Google alerts LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Angelina is apparently having financial problems:

NewsNation) — Angelina Jolie may have made almost $55 million when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Russian billionaire Yuri Sheffler, but that may be her last big paycheck for a very long time.

A Hollywood insider told me, “She has some small roles coming out in indy movies — one is said to even be good –—but it won’t make her the big money (she’s used to and needs to fund her lifestyle).”

“Yes, she’s a woman approaching 50 in Hollywood and things get harder (for that demographic) — but she’s also not particularly well-liked in the industry.”

https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/angelina-jolie-facing-cash-crisis/

The insider also confirms Jolie is not well liked in Hollywood

there are no insiders and no one close to Brad is talking to news nation just like they are not talking to intouch weekly. If they were they would get basic information right. Vivienne wasn't a producer. She's was just a assistant. She also received more then 55 million in the the deal.

Paula makes things up. She always has stories about celeb "friends" talking to her. It's all BS. I like newsnation but I don't understand that segment at all.

Eh, she spends money like water. How could she not have financial problems at some point? She needs to find a wealthy mate who paid for everything like Pitt did or she needs to cut back. Beginning with that Atelier Jolie joke of an albatross.

The article confirmed she is spending over $700,000 a year on the storefront for her failed fashion label. Apparently, the store is a ghost town. It’s a vanity project that is going no where. She also must have spent millions “producing” The Outsiders play. She is spending millions, including on lawyer fees, yet she has nothing coming in outside of Brad’s child support, which is only for two children now.

Confirmed by whom? Is this her accountant providing this financial information. And you don't think Producers of successful Broadway shows aren't receiving any of the funds.